Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Tested and proven?alfa wrote:mero wrote:And you cyah wear yuh gyal jeans and the 2 size too small Hollister tee again.
Glock 43x and a slim line IWB holster go fix that.
Almost every new recipient i see who acquired a firearm suddenly became obsessed with it till it become their personality and identity, from business man to bad boy. That power is not for everybody. Thay is a serious burden and responsibility to carry.MaxPower wrote:mero wrote:Guns in the hands of cowards and already paranoid men who does want to cross the road when they see a creole walking on the same side is a recipe for disaster waiting to happen..
FUL screening should consist of social media posts and heavy psychometric and mental evaluations cuz like half a allyuh who want gun not right in allyuh head.
X3000.
Brandishing like that for any and everything.
The FUL requirements are way too easy to fulfill and “law abiding” and “responsibility” is difficult to really determine.
I have said it before….the insecure small coco man that sending death threats to he woman/hornerman, the village drunk that beating the wife/children, the road rage ignoranters, the questionable social media posters…….they can all be easily shown as law abiding on paper.
mero wrote:Guns in the hands of cowards and already paranoid men who does want to cross the road when they see a creole walking on the same side is a recipe for disaster waiting to happen..
FUL screening should consist of social media posts and heavy psychometric and mental evaluations cuz like half a allyuh who want gun not right in allyuh head.
iLuvBandit.tt.net88sins wrote:mero wrote:Guns in the hands of cowards and already paranoid men who does want to cross the road when they see a creole walking on the same side is a recipe for disaster waiting to happen..
FUL screening should consist of social media posts and heavy psychometric and mental evaluations cuz like half a allyuh who want gun not right in allyuh head.
One man's cowardice and paranoia in another man's preference to avoid conflict and hyper-vigilance/situational awareness. But everybody entitled to their opinion, no matter how erroneous or biased that opinion may be.
Psychological examination was always a requirement son, and I go bring you up to speed a lil bit.
A boi can get and pass all the psychometric testing and evaluation you can possibly ask for today, submit it with his application, and go bat-shit crazy the following week and still eventually get his FUL, buy a strap, and nobody outside of someone who knows everything about him would have any idea that a certified lunatic is armed and amidst the public.
mero wrote:Almost every new recipient i see who acquired a firearm suddenly became obsessed with it till it become their personality and identity, from business man to bad boy. That power is not for everybody. Thay is a serious burden and responsibility to carry.MaxPower wrote:mero wrote:Guns in the hands of cowards and already paranoid men who does want to cross the road when they see a creole walking on the same side is a recipe for disaster waiting to happen..
FUL screening should consist of social media posts and heavy psychometric and mental evaluations cuz like half a allyuh who want gun not right in allyuh head.
X3000.
Brandishing like that for any and everything.
The FUL requirements are way too easy to fulfill and “law abiding” and “responsibility” is difficult to really determine.
I have said it before….the insecure small coco man that sending death threats to he woman/hornerman, the village drunk that beating the wife/children, the road rage ignoranters, the questionable social media posters…….they can all be easily shown as law abiding on paper.
Suddenly men want men test them and trying to put themselves in unnecessary situations to pull it or talking talk where they could use it, as if it not gonna be the beginning of a new set of problems they not ready for.
Man washing wares with gun on dey waist. Men checking in on d gun every 15 minutes, man taking selfie, men showing everybody it. Madness
Y are u so adamant about trespass ?mero wrote:Agreed sins, and its easy to make assumptions from a responsible ful holder, hunter/member of the protective services pov where carrying is like second nature.
But, this is the GENERAL PUBLIC we talking about here. Have 2nrs confidently saying 9mm have no recoil ffs. Trinis already violent, bad and short tempered, even non violent people violent and people who not bad bad and we were being encouraged by our now PM through her campaign, citing the same violent dancehall music we scorn to "knock it on dem" reload and "empty the clip"
Quite sure lots of clips will be emptied, is who gonna pick up
mero wrote:Almost every new recipient i see who acquired a firearm suddenly became obsessed with it till it become their personality and identity, from business man to bad boy. That power is not for everybody. Thay is a serious burden and responsibility to carry.MaxPower wrote:mero wrote:Guns in the hands of cowards and already paranoid men who does want to cross the road when they see a creole walking on the same side is a recipe for disaster waiting to happen..
FUL screening should consist of social media posts and heavy psychometric and mental evaluations cuz like half a allyuh who want gun not right in allyuh head.
X3000.
Brandishing like that for any and everything.
The FUL requirements are way too easy to fulfill and “law abiding” and “responsibility” is difficult to really determine.
I have said it before….the insecure small coco man that sending death threats to he woman/hornerman, the village drunk that beating the wife/children, the road rage ignoranters, the questionable social media posters…….they can all be easily shown as law abiding on paper.
Suddenly men want men test them and trying to put themselves in unnecessary situations to pull it or talking talk where they could use it, as if it not gonna be the beginning of a new set of problems they not ready for.
Man washing wares with gun on dey waist. Men checking in on d gun every 15 minutes, man taking selfie, men showing everybody it. Madness
sMASH wrote:Y are u so adamant about trespass ?mero wrote:Agreed sins, and its easy to make assumptions from a responsible ful holder, hunter/member of the protective services pov where carrying is like second nature.
But, this is the GENERAL PUBLIC we talking about here. Have 2nrs confidently saying 9mm have no recoil ffs. Trinis already violent, bad and short tempered, even non violent people violent and people who not bad bad and we were being encouraged by our now PM through her campaign, citing the same violent dancehall music we scorn to "knock it on dem" reload and "empty the clip"
Quite sure lots of clips will be emptied, is who gonna pick up
The stand ur ground legislation does it exist if ur not on other people property
Ttps : I feared for my life and exercised my use of force policy.mero wrote:sMASH wrote:Y are u so adamant about trespass ?mero wrote:Agreed sins, and its easy to make assumptions from a responsible ful holder, hunter/member of the protective services pov where carrying is like second nature.
But, this is the GENERAL PUBLIC we talking about here. Have 2nrs confidently saying 9mm have no recoil ffs. Trinis already violent, bad and short tempered, even non violent people violent and people who not bad bad and we were being encouraged by our now PM through her campaign, citing the same violent dancehall music we scorn to "knock it on dem" reload and "empty the clip"
Quite sure lots of clips will be emptied, is who gonna pick up
The stand ur ground legislation does it exist if ur not on other people property
Why are you adamant on trying to get any excuse to shoot or kill someone? U self say u more than willing to kill a youthman for retrieving a cricket ball in your yard. That is not standing your ground saddis.
mero wrote:Agreed sins, and its easy to make assumptions from a responsible ful holder, hunter/member of the protective services pov where carrying is like second nature.
But, this is the GENERAL PUBLIC we talking about here. Have 2nrs confidently saying 9mm have no recoil ffs. Trinis already violent, bad and short tempered, even non violent people violent and people who not bad bad and we were being encouraged by our now PM through her campaign, citing the same violent dancehall music we scorn to "knock it on dem" reload and "empty the clip"
Quite sure lots of clips will be emptied, is who gonna pick up
alfa wrote:Tbh washing wares with gun on your waist seems extreme but these guys who applied for personal protection weapon would know the reason why. Recently I did a firearms course and a classmate told me even when he's watching tv and playing with the dog his pistol is within arms reach. This is an older big belly dude who has his decades now, not the metro gym rat type who now get ful and looking to flams.
A former special forces guy once told me even when he on the beach in his swim trunks he has his piece 'discreetly concealed' and just cleans and lubes the gun and ammo after. It's s Glock so no rust. I didn't bother to ask where exactly he conceales it and no it wasn't no funny man discussion but genuine carry mindset he was trying to impart
Hopefully neither of those situations ever reaches me but those guys know why they carry the way they do. Trinidad ain't for the light hearted
Honesty is good for the soul .mero wrote:alfa wrote:Tbh washing wares with gun on your waist seems extreme but these guys who applied for personal protection weapon would know the reason why. Recently I did a firearms course and a classmate told me even when he's watching tv and playing with the dog his pistol is within arms reach. This is an older big belly dude who has his decades now, not the metro gym rat type who now get ful and looking to flams.
A former special forces guy once told me even when he on the beach in his swim trunks he has his piece 'discreetly concealed' and just cleans and lubes the gun and ammo after. It's s Glock so no rust. I didn't bother to ask where exactly he conceales it and no it wasn't no funny man discussion but genuine carry mindset he was trying to impart
Hopefully neither of those situations ever reaches me but those guys know why they carry the way they do. Trinidad ain't for the light hearted
Key words, special forces and seasoned FUL holder. But better than me. Can't imagine having to deal with that responsibility and just living my life normal. Better to have it and not need it than need it when u don't have it but I cool dey.
Sure yuh breden swimming in tiny mid thigh trunks too lmao
j.o.e wrote:Everyone’s situation, lifestyle and risks different. With a FUL my focus is on home protection but can’t knock anyone who wants to carry 100% of the time. I would really pick and choose when I carry. A gun is a big responsibility and sometimes a hassle.
pugboy wrote:makes sense
when bandits robbing you in public in 2s and 3s it really don’t make sense to engage and run high risk of everybody dead including yourself
and no doubt them bandits will adjust their robbing protocols to suitj.o.e wrote:Everyone’s situation, lifestyle and risks different. With a FUL my focus is on home protection but can’t knock anyone who wants to carry 100% of the time. I would really pick and choose when I carry. A gun is a big responsibility and sometimes a hassle.
MaxPower wrote:Mero,
What about the FUL holder who purposely walking around with the firearm printing through the clothes or the fake “stretch” where they raise their hands so their shirt could raise and ppl can see dey carrying
LOL
Telling me. Worse yet when they head nice and trying to impress a lil smally or Spanish.MaxPower wrote:Mero,
What about the FUL holder who purposely walking around with the firearm printing through the clothes or the fake “stretch” where they raise their hands so their shirt could raise and ppl can see dey carrying
LOL
mero wrote:Almost every new recipient i see who acquired a firearm suddenly became obsessed with it till it become their personality and identity, from business man to bad boy. That power is not for everybody. Thay is a serious burden and responsibility to carry.MaxPower wrote:mero wrote:Guns in the hands of cowards and already paranoid men who does want to cross the road when they see a creole walking on the same side is a recipe for disaster waiting to happen..
FUL screening should consist of social media posts and heavy psychometric and mental evaluations cuz like half a allyuh who want gun not right in allyuh head.
X3000.
Brandishing like that for any and everything.
The FUL requirements are way too easy to fulfill and “law abiding” and “responsibility” is difficult to really determine.
I have said it before….the insecure small coco man that sending death threats to he woman/hornerman, the village drunk that beating the wife/children, the road rage ignoranters, the questionable social media posters…….they can all be easily shown as law abiding on paper.
Suddenly men want men test them and trying to put themselves in unnecessary situations to pull it or talking talk where they could use it, as if it not gonna be the beginning of a new set of problems they not ready for.
Man washing wares with gun on dey waist. Men checking in on d gun every 15 minutes, man taking selfie, men showing everybody it. Madness
RBphoto wrote:So Tants say to apply for the FUL. can someone post the current procedure?. Also, the "reason" for application, can it be for "Protection of self and property, hunting and professional marksmanship?" Would that get my application thrown out?
RBphoto wrote:So Tants say to apply for the FUL. can someone post the current procedure?. Also, the "reason" for application, can it be for "Protection of self and property, hunting and professional marksmanship?" Would that get my application thrown out?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 82 guests