sMASH wrote:Nope, system is sufficient. A community should physically look for the moon themselves. There will be ambiguity between different locations due to weather, but that should not be a problem, just apply the information into the rules there are. Saudi started to fast already, we starting tomorrow. Now chatted with an Indian, they're starting tomorrow as well, Insha allah.
It is not meant to be a worldwide coordinated event, but a means by which u canines nature to follow the laws, and practise to not let it become a epidemic contention.
A few places will have did on different days, and that is ok. And eid is really that whole week, not just that day. So is no real scenes.
I am not trying to make this into a "Religion Discussion", just discussing the thread title wrt moon sighting.
So just to educate me...
Wouldn't it appear as though Trini's (and countries with our climate) are cheating a day from the 'month' of Ramadaan because of our geographic location?
Because isn't Ramadaan an actual month in the Islamic Calendar...
That would have naturally started regardless if you saw the moon or not?
For example... the other months of the Islamic calendar are started as ended when it is supposed to in a wordwide accepted way.
Correct me if I'm wrong...
But the moon signifies the start of each month in the Islamic calendar, and once the moon is seen (even by other countries) it means that particular month has started or ended.
So why is it different with the calendar month called Ramadaan?
Look at tonight...
The sky is overcast and cloudy again just like yesterday.
If you don't see the moon (again), does it mean that you will keep waiting to declare the start of Ramadaan?
If you base the start and end of each month in the Islamic calendar on when your country actually sees the moon then wouldn't everybody have a different calendar?
I mean... I understand the traditions of Muslim families looking for the moon to start the Ramadaan etc..
But in situations where the weather affects visibility, why can't you use the existing technology, communication etc to verify that the New Moon is actually out - just like what is done for the other islamic months?
Let's say the next new moon is scheduled to come out exactly 30 days after this one...
then the people that saw the moon (on it's first day) would be fasting for the next 30 days until the next new moon ends it.
But if (like in Trinidad) you don't see the moon on the first day and you start fasting on the second day.. then you'd only be fasting for 29 days.
Some could look at it as 'getting away' from the extra day of fast and others could look at it like missing out on that extra day of blessings.
From my humble view...
Another aspect being affected with this "actual moon sighting" is the day of Eid.
From what I know.. on the (actual) day of Eid, you are forbidden to fast.
So how can Eid be an entire week?
It may be 'celebrated' during a particular week but the actual Eid Day can't be an entire week.
Supposing the moon is sighted in another country (like it did this time) to signify that Ramadaan has ended and the next day is Eid... which is declared by that country to be (eg) 06th July.
Then really and truly, Eid Day is supposed to be 06th July because the New Moon is out.
But if Trinidad doesn't (actually) see the moon and they continue to fast on the 06th July... then wouldn't they be committing a sin (technically)?
(since u are forbidden to fast on eid)
Wouldn't the significance of the Eid day be missed because the moon was not sighted by your country and therefore you celebrated Eid on the wrong day?
Trinidad (and countries with our climate) would be more susceptible to cloudy overcast skies blocking the view of the moon and always causing this confusion. Especially due to the fact that every year the weather patterns are getting worse.
I remember this one time where people were so confused that half the country celebrated Eid on one day the the other half on the next day.
I think you can still maintain traditions but when it is really not visible then use the technology... just like it is used for many other aspects of the religion.
The scriptures that would have said to look for the moon probably didn't mean that (till the end of time) you have to physically look for it.
It could have been the instructions giving in that era since people then would have been confused if God told them to "check the internet".
(no offense intended)
sMASH wrote:Those persons who look to define a single point of rule, will put all the power and authority with those in control of that point. As it is, everyone has the rules, and everyone is supposed to understand them and follow them. And that way, they cannot be corrupted, as anyone from anywhere has the ability, right and obligation to correct the wrong.
This statement is a but confusing...
Wouldn't putting the "power and control" in mutliple 'groups' for their interpretation cause more confusion that if one (group) defines the rules?
(eg) if the Darul Uloom group declares when Ramadaan starts/stops based on what they determine... but the ASJA group gets word from a neighboring country on different moon sighting.
Who makes the declaration?
I would think that the country where the Islamic scholars study and reside should have the ultimate decision especially since their interpretation is usually referenced when understanding the religion.
Just looking at the scenario from the outside.