Flow
Flow
TriniTuner.com  |  Latest Event:  

Forums

San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway

this is how we do it.......

Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods

abbow
I LUV THIS PLACE
Posts: 1060
Joined: June 29th, 2006, 2:30 pm
Location: Around...

Re: San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway

Postby abbow » September 19th, 2014, 7:49 am

who have access to the money to spend it ...Kubs or the gov? Let kubs and his crew worry abt the environment......im simply worried abt my taxes and how its being utilized....

u should worry about in the future if you can flash your party card at a hospital and be able to get medical care when in need...

u seem to be from the elite group who dont pay taxes and dont care how it benefits one and all....

btw....its not the typical injun crab in barrel syndrome....we injun have, and always had and will always have.....we work to get ours....and dont need to support corruption by the gov of the day to get some.

Mark Twain once said:

Never argue with stupid people...they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.....

UML take note ....and do have a wonderful blessed day...

User avatar
UML
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6575
Joined: April 9th, 2007, 11:08 pm

Re: San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway

Postby UML » September 19th, 2014, 8:13 am

#countrybookieproblems

Ah tell yuh already the highway go help yuh...yuh go get brite!

Pnm wudnt refer to u as Duene and Lagawho (sp) :roll:



PPG FTW!!!

User avatar
toyota_lover
Trinituner Peong
Posts: 454
Joined: April 24th, 2008, 8:31 am

Re: San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway

Postby toyota_lover » September 19th, 2014, 4:36 pm


User avatar
wagonrunner
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 13547
Joined: May 18th, 2004, 9:38 am
Location: Distancing myself from those who want to raid the barn but eh want to plant the corn.
Contact:

Re: San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway

Postby wagonrunner » September 19th, 2014, 5:52 pm

any change in the condition of guapo beach since they started doing work on the river bridge by the roundabout?

9YDMS
Riding on 17's
Posts: 1510
Joined: March 3rd, 2013, 1:07 pm

Re: San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway

Postby 9YDMS » September 20th, 2014, 1:22 am


Redman
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 10430
Joined: August 19th, 2004, 2:48 pm

Re: San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway

Postby Redman » September 20th, 2014, 8:04 am

We need to bring GORTT to the table.....finally a chamber with a back bone.

http://www.trinidadexpress.com/news/Pen ... &smobile=y

Penal/Debe Chamber backs Kublalsingh



HUNGER striker Dr Wayne Kublalsingh is not a “mad man” and his protest over issues related to the Debe to Mon Desir segment of the Solomon Hochoy Highway extension to Point Fortin should not be dismissed.

And even if he is wrong, Kublalsingh should be admired for his passion, president of the Penal/Debe Chamber of Commerce, Shahid Hosein, said yesterday. Hosein was asked about the Chamber’s position on the advantages of the highway to the development of the area, and on the decision of Kublalsingh to undertake a second hunger strike in protest over the construction of the highway between Debe and on Desir. Hosein said: “Anywhere there are highways, it lends to the development of those areas. But Penal and Debe are already well-established centres and the fact that the highway is passing through is not going to affect these areas. “Essentially we are in support of the highway because it would eventually open these areas when time comes for further development but I do not see it significantly impacting commerce in our specific area of Penal and Debe.” He said there were many interconnected roads in the area, which already allow the traveller to bypass Penal. “So therefore I don’t see the highway affecting us. It will take people from San Fernando to Siparia and bypass Penal and more quickly. But I don’t see it affecting the commerce itself. Penal and Debe are long-established centres that people will gravitate towards, depending on the services that are available and they have significant commercial interest established. For population to expand, the commercial interest will expand as long as the economy remains buoyant we will continue to expand.” Hosein said the Chamber has recommended to former works minister Jack Warner that the existing roads be strengthened and widened to avoid traffic. He added: “While the Chamber is for the highway we had some other reservations (that) this highway is really prone to flooding and therefore proper hydrological studies had to be done to ensure that we are not adding to the problem of flooding, because we don’t know if the flooding in Debe which happened for the first time (last month) is just an aberration because of the construction (of the highway) or if it is now a new feature. “My thinking is that it is an aberration based on the construction. Proper hydrological studies I think is the most critical for a highway in that area.” Hosein also said: “Even if one does not agree with Dr Kublalsingh, one has to admire he is prepared to stand up and fight for what he believes. “Very few of us are prepared to do that. So that even if he is wrong, you can’t help but admire that he is fighting for something. And the fact that the Armstrong report was commissioned and paid for by the State and citizens of this country, it seems to me that one should give some recognition for the Armstrong report, (and) based on what Dr Kublalsingh is saying, that is not the case. I do not, for one minute, think that Dr. Kublalsingh is a mad man.” Hosein also asked that citizens take note that the issue was not only about adequately compensating affected residents who must move out of the way of the highway. “You are fragmenting this community that have been together and there the psychological aspect of the dislocation this must be given consideration. People will make way for further development once they are properly compensated. Once there is trust and credibility on both sides anything can be resolved.”

Share

brams112
punchin NOS
Posts: 3697
Joined: July 15th, 2008, 8:58 pm
Location: trinidad

Re: San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway

Postby brams112 » September 20th, 2014, 9:20 pm

Some people just don't understand what they quote.The guy said,the hi way will not affect the business places because who need to buy will still come,traffic will continue on its way,once people get their compensation,they will move,but they will be nostalgic,Kubs doing what he thinks is a good deed,don't laff at him,he never said he supports him,just admire his courage,not so.

9YDMS
Riding on 17's
Posts: 1510
Joined: March 3rd, 2013, 1:07 pm

Re: San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway

Postby 9YDMS » September 20th, 2014, 11:33 pm

brams112 wrote:Some people just don't understand what they quote.The guy said,the hi way will not affect the business places because who need to buy will still come,traffic will continue on its way,once people get their compensation,they will move,but they will be nostalgic,Kubs doing what he thinks is a good deed,don't laff at him,he never said he supports him,just admire his courage,not so.


http://www.trinidadexpress.com/news/Cal ... 06421.html

Redman
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 10430
Joined: August 19th, 2004, 2:48 pm

Re: San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway

Postby Redman » September 21st, 2014, 8:29 am

brams112 wrote:Some people just don't understand what they quote.The guy said,the hi way will not affect the business places because who need to buy will still come,traffic will continue on its way,once people get their compensation,they will move,but they will be nostalgic,Kubs doing what he thinks is a good deed,don't laff at him,he never said he supports him,just admire his courage,not so.


Where you was???

I really dont care where the hway passes...
What I do care about is that we are allowed to influence our development in a proper way..

The hway is being treated just like the smelter-pushed ahead -public opinion be dammed.
It was wrong then...and its wrong now.

Again its a discussion on what is the best route-and the GORTT is remarkable in its silence.

So that even if he is wrong, you can’t help but admire that he is fighting for something. And the fact that the Armstrong report was commissioned and paid for by the State and citizens of this country, it seems to me that one should give some recognition for the Armstrong report, (and) based on what Dr Kublalsingh is saying, that is not the case. I do not, for one minute, think that Dr. Kublalsingh is a mad man.” Hosein also asked that citizens take note that the issue was not only about adequately compensating affected residents who must move out of the way of the highway. “You are fragmenting this community that have been together and there the psychological aspect of the dislocation this must be given consideration. People will make way for further development once they are properly compensated. Once there is trust and credibility on both sides anything can be resolved.

link
18 pounds of Boost
Posts: 2346
Joined: September 15th, 2004, 11:03 pm

Re: San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway

Postby link » September 21st, 2014, 8:36 am

....What I do care about is that we are allowed to influence our development in a proper way..

The hway is being treated just like the smelter-pushed ahead -public opinion be dammed.
It was wrong then..

the smelter was ALWAYS wrong.........u contradict yrslf.....the highway 'good' but u compare it to d smelter that would hve resulted in the wholesale rape of this country's resources...???
.
:roll:

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 25586
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway

Postby sMASH » September 21st, 2014, 10:28 am

Hmm. Watching the oas promo video, it doesn't seem too bad now.
I had thought thqt when it reaches debe it would have turned up to go to mosquito creek. His would have been unnecessary as well as costly, as it would have been passing through mangrove.
But it isn't so. The creek road is just an off shoot upgrade and not part of the high way

Passing through ghandi village takes it away Rom he mangrove and onto better ground.

Now I'm a more at ease with that section of the project.

Only two problems I have remaining: reluctance to consider the Armstrong report, and boxing in the mangrove at th creek.

Redman
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 10430
Joined: August 19th, 2004, 2:48 pm

Re: San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway

Postby Redman » September 21st, 2014, 12:26 pm

link wrote:
....What I do care about is that we are allowed to influence our development in a proper way..

The hway is being treated just like the smelter-pushed ahead -public opinion be dammed.
It was wrong then..

the smelter was ALWAYS wrong.........u contradict yrslf.....the highway 'good' but u compare it to d smelter that would hve resulted in the wholesale rape of this country's resources...???
.
:roll:


I was talking about the fact that both the PNM and UNC make a decision and push forward without due consultation-ignoring serious opposition from the people most directly affected.

:roll: :roll:

User avatar
civicman
3NE 2NR for life
Posts: 206
Joined: March 22nd, 2004, 10:17 am

Re: San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway

Postby civicman » September 21st, 2014, 2:22 pm

Redman wrote:
link wrote:
....What I do care about is that we are allowed to influence our development in a proper way..

The hway is being treated just like the smelter-pushed ahead -public opinion be dammed.
It was wrong then..

the smelter was ALWAYS wrong.........u contradict yrslf.....the highway 'good' but u compare it to d smelter that would hve resulted in the wholesale rape of this country's resources...???
.
:roll:


I was talking about the fact that both the PNM and UNC make a decision and push forward without due consultation-ignoring serious opposition from the people most directly affected.

:roll: :roll:


Ah highway ?
As a leader there will always be decisions that some will like and some dont.
The majority supported it in the area a handful say no.
In a vote you go with the majority you will never get 100%.
If you go with every opinion you will never get anything done.
No road ever built no school or hospital because some always has a different opinion of what is better ,
put here no put it there ,no spend the money on something else.

User avatar
UML
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6575
Joined: April 9th, 2007, 11:08 pm

Re: San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway

Postby UML » September 21st, 2014, 2:35 pm

sMASH wrote:Hmm. Watching the oas promo video, it doesn't seem too bad now.
I had thought thqt when it reaches debe it would have turned up to go to mosquito creek. His would have been unnecessary as well as costly, as it would have been passing through mangrove.
But it isn't so. The creek road is just an off shoot upgrade and not part of the high way

Passing through ghandi village takes it away Rom he mangrove and onto better ground.

Now I'm a more at ease with that section of the project.

Only two problems I have remaining: reluctance to consider the Armstrong report, and boxing in the mangrove at th creek.


Believe it or not, through the mangrove and onto the mosquito creek is the HRM "rerouted" suggestion :|

Redman
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 10430
Joined: August 19th, 2004, 2:48 pm

Re: San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway

Postby Redman » September 21st, 2014, 6:26 pm

civicman wrote:
Redman wrote:
link wrote:
....What I do care about is that we are allowed to influence our development in a proper way..

The hway is being treated just like the smelter-pushed ahead -public opinion be dammed.
It was wrong then..

the smelter was ALWAYS wrong.........u contradict yrslf.....the highway 'good' but u compare it to d smelter that would hve resulted in the wholesale rape of this country's resources...???
.
:roll:


I was talking about the fact that both the PNM and UNC make a decision and push forward without due consultation-ignoring serious opposition from the people most directly affected.

:roll: :roll:


Ah highway ?
As a leader there will always be decisions that some will like and some dont.
The majority supported it in the area a handful say no.
In a vote you go with the majority you will never get 100%.
If you go with every opinion you will never get anything done.
No road ever built no school or hospital because some always has a different opinion of what is better ,
put here no put it there ,no spend the money on something else.


Allyuh reading?

DUE CONSULTATION.

The GORTT has the responsibility to disclose the rationale behind their decisions.
The administrate on behalf of us.
If they can't defend their rationale then why spend the money.

The Armstrong report listed major short comings in the process.

There is a reason there is aprocess that is used in public projects like this..

User avatar
UML
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6575
Joined: April 9th, 2007, 11:08 pm

Re: San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway

Postby UML » September 21st, 2014, 6:41 pm

Redman wrote:
civicman wrote:
Redman wrote:
link wrote:
....What I do care about is that we are allowed to influence our development in a proper way..

The hway is being treated just like the smelter-pushed ahead -public opinion be dammed.
It was wrong then..

the smelter was ALWAYS wrong.........u contradict yrslf.....the highway 'good' but u compare it to d smelter that would hve resulted in the wholesale rape of this country's resources...???
.
:roll:


I was talking about the fact that both the PNM and UNC make a decision and push forward without due consultation-ignoring serious opposition from the people most directly affected.

:roll: :roll:


Ah highway ?
As a leader there will always be decisions that some will like and some dont.
The majority supported it in the area a handful say no.
In a vote you go with the majority you will never get 100%.
If you go with every opinion you will never get anything done.
No road ever built no school or hospital because some always has a different opinion of what is better ,
put here no put it there ,no spend the money on something else.


Allyuh reading?

DUE CONSULTATION.

The GORTT has the responsibility to disclose the rationale behind their decisions.
The administrate on behalf of us.
If they can't defend their rationale then why spend the money.

The Armstrong report listed major short comings in the process.

There is a reason there is aprocess that is used in public projects like this..


Consultation doesnt mean they have to listen or do what you say :|

Redman
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 10430
Joined: August 19th, 2004, 2:48 pm

Re: San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway

Postby Redman » September 21st, 2014, 8:36 pm

Agreed.
It also does not mean flip flopping on ascension into power,ignoring YOUR experts recommendations and pushing this as if there are hidden agendas to do this in a specific way.

User avatar
UML
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6575
Joined: April 9th, 2007, 11:08 pm

Re: San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway

Postby UML » September 22nd, 2014, 6:47 pm

Kubs want to make a deal with kamla...like he realize he go dead dis time cause nobody taking him on.

brams112
punchin NOS
Posts: 3697
Joined: July 15th, 2008, 8:58 pm
Location: trinidad

Re: San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway

Postby brams112 » September 22nd, 2014, 9:23 pm

News says he begging dooks to get him a visa to go meet kams in the us,mc did not want to talk,but want to go make a sceen in Uncle Sam home town.

User avatar
The_Honourable
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 10484
Joined: June 14th, 2009, 3:45 pm
Location: Together We Conspire, Together We Deceive

Re: San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway

Postby The_Honourable » September 22nd, 2014, 10:45 pm

Pressure kubz pressure...

Another defeat for Re-Route Movement

By: Rickie Ramdass rickie.ramdass @trinidadexpress.com
Story Created: Sep 22, 2014 at 9:29 PM ECT
Story Updated: Sep 22, 2014 at 9:29 PM ECT

THE Highway Re-Route Movement (HRM) suffered yet another defeat yesterday when the Court of Appeal again refused to grant an injunction to temporarily stop construction work along the Debe to Mon Desir link of the Sir Solomon Hochoy Highway extension to Point Fortin.

It was only last month that another panel of Appeal Court judges refused a previous application for an injunction. The latest application was to have the interim injunction granted pending a hearing at the London-based Privy Council, challenging the court’s initial refusal. See Page 9.

During yesterday’s hearing in Port of Spain which was presided over by appellate judges Justices Peter Jamadar, Maureen Rajnauth-Lee and Prakash Moosai, the judges heard arguments from both sides for more than two hours before arriving at the decision not to grant the injunction.

Senior Counsel Ramesh Lawrence Maharaj, who along with Fyard Hosein is leading the case for the HRM which is headed by environmentalist Dr Wayne Kublalsingh said the property of all of the claimants in the matter with the exception of Kublalsingh was in close proximity to the questioned section of the highway.

In May, Justice James Aboud dismissed the application on the basis of the length of time the HRM took before making the application. Despite not granting the conservatory order, however, Justice Aboud agreed with the HRM that there was a breach of the principle of legitimate expectation by the Government not considering the report.

Source: http://www.trinidadexpress.com/news/Ano ... 00791.html

User avatar
grad
Sweet on this forum
Posts: 256
Joined: March 26th, 2008, 1:49 pm
Location: South

Re: San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway

Postby grad » September 23rd, 2014, 8:12 am

“As Attorney General I cannot support any litigant who loses a matter against the State and goes to set up camp and declare that they are going to starve themself to death so that they can get what the court did not give them,” he said.

User avatar
UML
Trying to catch PATCH AND VEGA
Posts: 6575
Joined: April 9th, 2007, 11:08 pm

Re: San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway

Postby UML » September 23rd, 2014, 9:03 am

AG: Kublalsingh trying to be clever

Story Created: Sep 22, 2014 at 9:20 PM ECT

Story Updated: Sep 22, 2014 at 9:20 PM ECT

Attorney General Anand Ramlogan yesterday questioned whether Highway Re-Route Movement leader Dr Wayne Kublalsingh would have given in to his demands if he was the one on a hunger strike.

Speaking to reporters following the special sitting of the Industrial Court, Ramlogan asked:

“Had I lost the matter Dr Kublalsingh filed in court (High Court) and the injunction was granted to stop the highway, if I had said I was going on a hunger strike so that Dr Kublalsingh could remove the injunction so the highway could be built because I felt strongly about it, would he have relented and allowed the highway to be built?”

“I think not...the point is, as Attorney General I cannot support any litigant who loses a matter against the State and goes to set up camp and declare that they are going to starve themself to death so that they can get what the court did not give them,” he said.

Ramlogan criticised Kublalsingh for his “clever attempt to shift the ball in the Government’s quarter” by saying his life is in Government’s hands.

He described this move as disingenuous on the part of the environmentalist.

“Your life, each and every human being’s life is in his own hands,” Ramlogan said.

The Attorney General denied claims by the HRM that Government did not consider the Armstrong report which concluded that the Environmental Impact Assessment for the Debe to Mon Desir segment of the Solomon Hochoy Highway extension was flawed.

He said Works and Infrastructure Minister Dr Surujrattan Rambachan is able to detail how the recommendations contained in the report were fulfilled.

“The Government is constrained in drilling down too deep into this matter because we are not going to be lured into the trap of speaking about a matter whilst it is before the court. Dr Kublalsingh has an application as we speak before the Court of Appeal to seek leave of permission to take his case to the Privy Council,” Ramlogan said.

“In the face of that application, how could it be right to act in a manner that is inconsistent with all the established norms and to ask that the Government engage in a battle on the ground on a war of words. The place for those war of words was removed from the ground into the Supreme Court of justice and the Government will therefore abide by the rulings of the court to act in a manner to support due process, law and order,” he added.

“At the end of the day, we have a duty to listen to the voices of those who endure the horrific, traumatic and distressing traffic, to get up at 3 a.m. without seeing your daughter go to school, without being able to cook a breakfast for that child because you have to catch a bus at San Fernando by the wharf and to run into Port of Spain to beat that traffic every morning.”
http://www.trinidadexpress.com/news/AG- ... 00001.html

dezz
Riding on 13's
Posts: 1
Joined: May 17th, 2014, 4:09 pm

Re: San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway

Postby dezz » September 23rd, 2014, 2:18 pm

bring it on

User avatar
civicman
3NE 2NR for life
Posts: 206
Joined: March 22nd, 2004, 10:17 am

Re: San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway

Postby civicman » September 23rd, 2014, 4:51 pm

“At the end of the day, we have a duty to listen to the voices of those who endure the horrific, traumatic and distressing traffic, to get up at 3 a.m. without seeing your daughter go to school, without being able to cook a breakfast for that child because you have to catch a bus at San Fernando by the wharf and to run into Port of Spain to beat that traffic every morning.”
http://www.trinidadexpress.com/news/AG- ... 00001.html[/quote][/quote]

Is only people who kettchin' they tail like that could understand
Who the hell cares if some sayin' they have hidden agenda build the damn thing
stop south and deep south from the neglect all the years
Fire bun who object.

I from central by the way buh i see the sufferation in south

brams112
punchin NOS
Posts: 3697
Joined: July 15th, 2008, 8:58 pm
Location: trinidad

Re: San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway

Postby brams112 » September 23rd, 2014, 7:38 pm

Passed through beridge trace today,the overpass is open now for vehicles to use,did not stop to take pics,was to busy.Let Kubs haul he MC.

User avatar
nervewrecker
3NE 2NR Power Seller
Posts: 23829
Joined: July 31st, 2007, 2:27 pm
Location: The world is fl4t

Re: San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway

Postby nervewrecker » September 23rd, 2014, 7:42 pm

What is this I overheard on the news about these fishermen? Was it highway related?

Oropouche was busy today, wanted to stop to take some pics from there.

Here is dehli road Image

Image

Image

Image

brams112
punchin NOS
Posts: 3697
Joined: July 15th, 2008, 8:58 pm
Location: trinidad

Re: San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway

Postby brams112 » September 23rd, 2014, 7:47 pm

Those pics are how old nerve?Because the guy who owns that house with the dish says he have to move,heard him say so yesterday.

User avatar
nervewrecker
3NE 2NR Power Seller
Posts: 23829
Joined: July 31st, 2007, 2:27 pm
Location: The world is fl4t

Re: San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway

Postby nervewrecker » September 23rd, 2014, 8:04 pm

I took those pics yesterday afternoon.

User avatar
grad
Sweet on this forum
Posts: 256
Joined: March 26th, 2008, 1:49 pm
Location: South

Re: San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway

Postby grad » September 23rd, 2014, 11:58 pm

saw the concrete trucks pumping tonight at debe interchange! have a very far and blurry pic. i will upload soon

User avatar
nervewrecker
3NE 2NR Power Seller
Posts: 23829
Joined: July 31st, 2007, 2:27 pm
Location: The world is fl4t

Re: San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway

Postby nervewrecker » September 25th, 2014, 4:56 pm

ImageImage

From oropouche side

Advertisement

Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 23 guests