Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Duane 3NE 2NR Wrote
Its a remake and a very well known story, so obviously it's predictable. Most good vs evil, mythology stories are predictable.
too long? I guess you never watched the sci-fi epic classic DUNE or even the extended versions of Lord of the Rings
ok and yes the graphics didnt look shitty in the preview
V2NR 3.0 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR WroteIts a remake and a very well known story, so obviously it's predictable. Most good vs evil, mythology stories are predictable.
While i tend to partially agree with you, thats the point of the matter. Its not ought to be predictable. Did you see the part where Medusa's head was cut off ? - How he looked in the shield for the reflection ? - This was in the old version as well.
r3iXmann wrote:V2NR 3.0 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR WroteIts a remake and a very well known story, so obviously it's predictable. Most good vs evil, mythology stories are predictable.
While i tend to partially agree with you, thats the point of the matter. Its not ought to be predictable. Did you see the part where Medusa's head was cut off ? - How he looked in the shield for the reflection ? - This was in the old version as well.
Errm..it's an epic story..the details won't change if they remade it a million times
That's like expecting to watch a movie about the events of WW2 and expecting the allies to NOT win
pioneer wrote:ok anyone found medusa real sexy?....i was kinda turned on
EVA Unit-01 wrote:so i jus saw it @ MovieTowne
i give the movie a 2.5 out of 5 for the following reasons:
1. The story was very much changed, from both the original movie and the mythology. As such, lovers of either will find it somewhat disappointing.
2. The special effects were lacking in the"special" department, either by choice (like the animatronic boatman) or cost (looks like they saved mostly for the scorpions and the Kraken).
3. The casting was a bit off (i mean, come on! an Indian dude in the Olympian plethora of gods?!), with the acting being rather bland and uninspired (except for Zeus' exclamations of "You're a son of Zeus!"); wasn't helped by the lackluster script.
4. The director's inspiration was all too obvious due to his wholesale copying from other praiseworthy sources (the God of War series, Avatar, etc).
if you're viewing it as a first-timer, without the classic 1981 version affixed firmly in your fondest memories, you just might enjoy it as another action blockbuster.
but if you're looking for an update of the timeless classic you loved as a child, you may be somewhat disappointed...
that's why it's called a Classic
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 44 guests