Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
HUTRINI wrote:NarendZORCE, I really think the point your making is unfair...
i think it should be ONE DEFINATE cut off point across the board, NOT on an individual car to car...engine to engine basis.
Lemme explain why:
STOCK a R34 GTR dynos at around 300
STOCK a CIVIC MUGEN RR dynos at around 300
Neither have to put on a cage then? Thats what your sayingBecause according to your argument "Cars or platforms that cater from the factory for low power engines are more at risk structurally after recieving high power upgrades and transplants."
Both cars are putting out similar power figures, both are STOCK ...same rules apply???
*Both Cars doing under 12-for argument sake*
X_Factor wrote:in terms of safety what exactly does a roll cage do for a 10-12 sec. car thats basically designed to go in a straight line?...
then its best u say all cars in dex/drifting should have a cage also? arnt they more likely to flip?
NarendZORCE wrote:HUTRINI wrote:NarendZORCE, I really think the point your making is unfair...
i think it should be ONE DEFINATE cut off point across the board, NOT on an individual car to car...engine to engine basis.
Lemme explain why:
STOCK a R34 GTR dynos at around 300
STOCK a CIVIC MUGEN RR dynos at around 300
Neither have to put on a cage then? Thats what your sayingBecause according to your argument "Cars or platforms that cater from the factory for low power engines are more at risk structurally after recieving high power upgrades and transplants."
Both cars are putting out similar power figures, both are STOCK ...same rules apply???
*Both Cars doing under 12-for argument sake*
I know my point is not equal to all cars, but are all cars structurally equal?
NarendZORCE wrote:HUTRINI wrote:11.99=ROLL BAR
10.99=ROLL CAGE
NO EXCEPTIONSRegardless of how "structurally sound" you think your car is.
Like a 1/2 cage? Perhaps that could be a good meeting point for all. Something better than nothing IMO.
HUTRINI wrote:NarendZORCE wrote:HUTRINI wrote:NarendZORCE, I really think the point your making is unfair...
i think it should be ONE DEFINATE cut off point across the board, NOT on an individual car to car...engine to engine basis.
Lemme explain why:
STOCK a R34 GTR dynos at around 300
STOCK a CIVIC MUGEN RR dynos at around 300
Neither have to put on a cage then? Thats what your sayingBecause according to your argument "Cars or platforms that cater from the factory for low power engines are more at risk structurally after recieving high power upgrades and transplants."
Both cars are putting out similar power figures, both are STOCK ...same rules apply???
*Both Cars doing under 12-for argument sake*
I know my point is not equal to all cars, but are all cars structurally equal?
Well once you know it's not equal to all cars, your leading to grey areas which cause confusion!
That is why there should be a definate cut off point! In terms of E.T. or MPH as stated in FIA rules.
If your car is running 11's and your in a Skyline...it doesn't matter you need a ROLL BAR installed!
If your car is running 10's and your in a Skyline...it doesn't matter you need a ROLL CAGE installed!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests