Most Useless University Degrees in Trinidad

[ProtonPowder]

Mark my words Jared. Once you get just a little life experience under your belt, your outlook on sex and gender relations will have an about face.

Many of us men can look back on who we were at your age, the way we thought, spoke, and acted. Things change you. Your first 'real' relationship; your first 'real' job; becoming a father, a homeowner, somebody who pays tens of thousands in taxes to the state every year. Take note of how many of those you achieved so far.

Then you realise that gender warriors are almost always middle class and rich women with too few worries in the world, and of course, the useful idiots like yourself who cowtow to them.

[The_Honourable]

I know Jared is ripe for a tuner roast but he is only 22... low him nah, he now looking to live life.

Yes, gender studies degrees are pretty much worthless because there is no demand for it unless it is for your own personal edification. Gender studies should not have morphed into a degree in the first place. A simple course within a Sociology degree was enough.

And btw... employers in the US are seeing persons with a gender studies degree as high potential of trouble in the workplace.

[VexXx Dogg]

Mark my words Jared. Once you get just a little life experience under your belt, your outlook on sex and gender relations will have an about face.

Many of us men can look back on who we were at your age, the way we thought, spoke, and acted. Things change you. Your first 'real' relationship; your first 'real' job; becoming a father, a homeowner, somebody who pays tens of thousands in taxes to the state every year. Take note of how many of those you achieved so far.

Then you realise that gender warriors are almost always middle class and rich women with too few worries in the world, and of course, the useful idiots like yourself who cowtow to them.

hard facts.

[st7]

Most useless degree in 2023.Anything gender studies based.An agenda should never be masqueraded as education.

May I ask what degree and/or profession you are currently doing.

Considering the domestic violence and harrassment women have to go through,I believe gender studies should be implmented into every school's curriculum.

what about domestic violence against men?

i guessing that doesnt exist to you. you need to think for yourself rather than regurgitate snowflake and cancel culture.

I've also noticed you ignore valid and logical questions that you cannot navigate to answer without sounding wrong.

Jared, what about domestic violence against men?

I do think their should be shelters in place to protect men. There have been feminist groups and organizations that have contrinuted to male domestic violence shelters.

in trinidad? where?

what's being done to protect men against domestic violence from women?

[DMan7]

Most useless degree in 2023.Anything gender studies based.An agenda should never be masqueraded as education.

May I ask what degree and/or profession you are currently doing.

Considering the domestic violence and harrassment women have to go through,I believe gender studies should be implmented into every school's curriculum.

what about domestic violence against men?

i guessing that doesnt exist to you. you need to think for yourself rather than regurgitate snowflake and cancel culture.

I've also noticed you ignore valid and logical questions that you cannot navigate to answer without sounding wrong.

Jared, what about domestic violence against men?

I do think their should be shelters in place to protect men. There have been feminist groups and organizations that have contrinuted to male domestic violence shelters.

in trinidad? where?

what's being done to protect men against domestic violence from women?

Being laughed out of the police station or masculinity being shamed even before you reach to the police station. That has been going on for decades, but nobody cares. Men in society are disposable.

[adnj]

The AI is gone. Subscription fees must be due. The real Jared is posting now.

The real Jared's posts are pitiful.

[88sins]

Anybody who believes that things like "homophobia" and "transphobia" and all those other gender/sexual preference inclined labels exist, is an idiot.

A man may not be willing to engage with a homosexual, but that doesn't mean he has an irrational fear of them. And that's the definition of what a phobia is, a powerful, irrational, illogical fear. Not understanding or tolerating something, is not the same thing as being afraid of it.


These people nowadays, like the true meaning of words mean nothing to them, and lying to themselves and everyone is the new acceptable standard for human interaction today.

[ruffneck_12]

Knowledge of gender issues does nothing for stemming violence. Many predatory men lurk within within those programmes and NGOs simply because it gives them access to vulnerable women while appearing to be allies.

Jared, you really showing your age and inexperience here.

For the first statement, do you have any sources to back up your claim. If not, it is an assumption.
Example of an article that discredits that claim:
https://bit.ly/3YQgIUd

For the second statement, that is essentially making alot men seem heartless and prone to being predatory. Which is worse than what y'all think I am doing since I am just pointing out the problems and not classifying one group as monsters.
And there is also the fact that you haven't provided a source that verifies your claim.

[Jared Mohammed]

Knowledge of gender issues does nothing for stemming violence. Many predatory men lurk within within those programmes and NGOs simply because it gives them access to vulnerable women while appearing to be allies.

Jared, you really showing your age and inexperience here.

For the first statement, do you have any sources to back up your claim. If not, it is an assumption.
Example of an article that discredits that claim:
https://bit.ly/3YQgIUd

For the second statement, that is essentially making alot men seem heartless and prone to being predatory. Which is worse than what y'all think I am doing since I am just pointing out the problems and not classifying one group as monsters.
And there is also the fact that you haven't provided a source that verifies your claim.

I am guessing you never heard of Whitehead and Russell's Principia Mathematica, where they took 1000 pages to prove 1+1 = 2. Alot of mathematical equations can be proven with more complex mathematical formulas. The "source" for mathematics is derivation.

[Jared Mohammed]

Anybody who believes that things like "homophobia" and "transphobia" and all those other gender/sexual preference inclined labels exist, is an idiot.

A man may not be willing to engage with a homosexual, but that doesn't mean he has an irrational fear of them. And that's the definition of what a phobia is, a powerful, irrational, illogical fear. Not understanding or tolerating something, is not the same thing as being afraid of it.


These people nowadays, like the true meaning of words mean nothing to them, and lying to themselves and everyone is the new acceptable standard for human interaction today.

Homophobia and transphobia does exist. Explain why alot of religious leaders and a handful of citizens are against having equal rights for LGBTQ+ people. Such as having: Anti-discrimination laws in employment, Anti-discrimination laws in the provision of goods and services, Anti-discrimination laws in all other areas (including indirect discrimination, hate speech), Same-sex marriages, Recognition of same-sex couples, Stepchild adoption by same-sex couples, Joint adoption by same-sex couples and the Right to change legal gender.

It is not about "engaging", it about the open restriction of equal rights to all citizens on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.

[ruffneck_12]

breddaman, u hadda leave this organization you working for inno. They brainwashing you.

Sexual preference isn't a required parameter on a resume, you just hadda get the job done.

However. Gay men really do tend to make up a large percentage of pedos, so they should be kept away from kids (School teachers/Chuck-e-cheese workers/etc)

[st7]

Anybody who believes that things like "homophobia" and "transphobia" and all those other gender/sexual preference inclined labels exist, is an idiot.

A man may not be willing to engage with a homosexual, but that doesn't mean he has an irrational fear of them. And that's the definition of what a phobia is, a powerful, irrational, illogical fear. Not understanding or tolerating something, is not the same thing as being afraid of it.


These people nowadays, like the true meaning of words mean nothing to them, and lying to themselves and everyone is the new acceptable standard for human interaction today.

Homophobia and transphobia does exist. Explain why alot of religious leaders and a handful of citizens are against having equal rights for LGBTQ+ people. Such as having: Anti-discrimination laws in employment, Anti-discrimination laws in the provision of goods and services, Anti-discrimination laws in all other areas (including indirect discrimination, hate speech), Same-sex marriages, Recognition of same-sex couples, Stepchild adoption by same-sex couples, Joint adoption by same-sex couples and the Right to change legal gender.

It is not about "engaging", it about the open restriction of equal rights to all citizens on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.

what restriction is there? what employer asks about gender or sexual orientation?

please provide proof of this in trinidad.

[ProtonPowder]

Knowledge of gender issues does nothing for stemming violence. Many predatory men lurk within within those programmes and NGOs simply because it gives them access to vulnerable women while appearing to be allies.

Jared, you really showing your age and inexperience here.

For the first statement, do you have any sources to back up your claim. If not, it is an assumption.
Example of an article that discredits that claim:
https://bit.ly/3YQgIUd

For the second statement, that is essentially making alot men seem heartless and prone to being predatory. Which is worse than what y'all think I am doing since I am just pointing out the problems and not classifying one group as monsters.
And there is also the fact that you haven't provided a source that verifies your claim.

I am guessing you never heard of Whitehead and Russell's Principia Mathematica, where they took 1000 pages to prove 1+1 = 2. Alot of mathematical equations can be proven with more complex mathematical formulas. The "source" for mathematics is derivation.main-qimg-0bc889422fccc6126e41d32c95499997-pjlq.jpg

[88sins]

Anybody who believes that things like "homophobia" and "transphobia" and all those other gender/sexual preference inclined labels exist, is an idiot.

A man may not be willing to engage with a homosexual, but that doesn't mean he has an irrational fear of them. And that's the definition of what a phobia is, a powerful, irrational, illogical fear. Not understanding or tolerating something, is not the same thing as being afraid of it.


These people nowadays, like the true meaning of words mean nothing to them, and lying to themselves and everyone is the new acceptable standard for human interaction today.

Homophobia and transphobia does exist. Explain why alot of religious leaders and a handful of citizens are against having equal rights for LGBTQ+ people. Such as having: Anti-discrimination laws in employment, Anti-discrimination laws in the provision of goods and services, Anti-discrimination laws in all other areas (including indirect discrimination, hate speech), Same-sex marriages, Recognition of same-sex couples, Stepchild adoption by same-sex couples, Joint adoption by same-sex couples and the Right to change legal gender.

It is not about "engaging", it about the open restriction of equal rights to all citizens on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.

Ok, let's take a logical approach to this. Let's look at marriage to start.
The concept of marriage, is founded primarily in religion, in every country on earth, from its inception, and its only in the last century or so that the state has chosen to get directly and heavily involved in the business of marriages.
Now, in keeping with the understanding that marriage is a religious ritual and is seen that way by the majority, regardless of the states late involvement to use it as a revenue generating business. And also understanding that there's no religious text in existence on this planet today that refers to same sex marriage as being an acceptable option, for any religious institution, anywhere, I want you to explain something to me.

Why should it be considered acceptable that the loud opinions of a few misguided people in society (the alphabet people), should be the deciding factor for the government forced alteration of the religious belief systems and traditions of the majority, simply because they (the alphabet people) want it and they don't care what it does to the traditional institution of marriage or the people who follow their religious beliefs including their religious teachings regarding marriage?

If thats too much for you to explain, ok. I want you to show me, what religion endorses homosexual marriage, and if such does exist, explain why they don't all just join that particular religion and leave everyone else's religious ceremonies and rituals alone?

[adnj]

Anybody who believes that things like "homophobia" and "transphobia" and all those other gender/sexual preference inclined labels exist, is an idiot.

A man may not be willing to engage with a homosexual, but that doesn't mean he has an irrational fear of them. And that's the definition of what a phobia is, a powerful, irrational, illogical fear. Not understanding or tolerating something, is not the same thing as being afraid of it.


These people nowadays, like the true meaning of words mean nothing to them, and lying to themselves and everyone is the new acceptable standard for human interaction today.

Homophobia and transphobia does exist. Explain why alot of religious leaders and a handful of citizens are against having equal rights for LGBTQ+ people. Such as having: Anti-discrimination laws in employment, Anti-discrimination laws in the provision of goods and services, Anti-discrimination laws in all other areas (including indirect discrimination, hate speech), Same-sex marriages, Recognition of same-sex couples, Stepchild adoption by same-sex couples, Joint adoption by same-sex couples and the Right to change legal gender.

It is not about "engaging", it about the open restriction of equal rights to all citizens on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.

Ok, let's take a logical approach to this. Let's look at marriage to start.
The concept of marriage, is founded primarily in religion, in every country on earth, from its inception, and its only in the last century or so that the state has chosen to get directly and heavily involved in the business of marriages.
Now, in keeping with the understanding that marriage is a religious ritual and is seen that way by the majority, regardless of the states late involvement to use it as a revenue generating business. And also understanding that there's no religious text in existence on this planet today that refers to same sex marriage as being an acceptable option, for any religious institution, anywhere, I want you to explain something to me.

Why should it be considered acceptable that the loud opinions of a few misguided people in society (the alphabet people), should be the deciding factor for the government forced alteration of the religious belief systems and traditions of the majority, simply because they (the alphabet people) want it and they don't care what it does to the traditional institution of marriage or the people who follow their religious beliefs including their religious teachings regarding marriage?

If thats too much for you to explain, ok. I want you to show me, what religion endorses homosexual marriage, and if such does exist, explain why they don't all just join that particular religion and leave everyone else's religious ceremonies and rituals alone?

Same sex marriage existed in ancient Rome, Greece and the Middle East. Same sex marriages existed the Americas before Columbus.

[Dohplaydat]

Look fellas, I doh deal up with all this gender nonsense and feminist BS ideology and thing as well.

Treat everyone with respect yes, but they also have to earn respect and realize that society is not should not give in to their mental illnesses.

That said, the more homosexual men out there the more women available for us.

If them prefer men to women, leave them, they missing out, how that affecting you?

[adnj]

Look fellas, I doh deal up with all this gender nonsense and feminist BS ideology and thing as well.

Treat everyone with respect yes, but they also have to earn respect and realize that society is not should not give in to their mental illnesses.

That said, the more homosexual men out there the more women available for us.

If them prefer men to women, leave them, they missing out, how that affecting you?

There are homosexual women, too.

The prevalence of male and females homosexuality through the years has not changed much, if at all. Knowing that there are homosexual men is not going to create some new group of women that you believe will suddenly be susceptible to your charms.

[nervewrecker]

breddaman, u hadda leave this organization you working for inno. They brainwashing you.

Sexual preference isn't a required parameter on a resume, you just hadda get the job done.

However. Gay men really do tend to make up a large percentage of pedos, so they should be kept away from kids (School teachers/Chuck-e-cheese workers/etc)

You have a credible source to back this up?

[88sins]

Anybody who believes that things like "homophobia" and "transphobia" and all those other gender/sexual preference inclined labels exist, is an idiot.

A man may not be willing to engage with a homosexual, but that doesn't mean he has an irrational fear of them. And that's the definition of what a phobia is, a powerful, irrational, illogical fear. Not understanding or tolerating something, is not the same thing as being afraid of it.


These people nowadays, like the true meaning of words mean nothing to them, and lying to themselves and everyone is the new acceptable standard for human interaction today.

Homophobia and transphobia does exist. Explain why alot of religious leaders and a handful of citizens are against having equal rights for LGBTQ+ people. Such as having: Anti-discrimination laws in employment, Anti-discrimination laws in the provision of goods and services, Anti-discrimination laws in all other areas (including indirect discrimination, hate speech), Same-sex marriages, Recognition of same-sex couples, Stepchild adoption by same-sex couples, Joint adoption by same-sex couples and the Right to change legal gender.

It is not about "engaging", it about the open restriction of equal rights to all citizens on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.

Ok, let's take a logical approach to this. Let's look at marriage to start.
The concept of marriage, is founded primarily in religion, in every country on earth, from its inception, and its only in the last century or so that the state has chosen to get directly and heavily involved in the business of marriages.
Now, in keeping with the understanding that marriage is a religious ritual and is seen that way by the majority, regardless of the states late involvement to use it as a revenue generating business. And also understanding that there's no religious text in existence on this planet today that refers to same sex marriage as being an acceptable option, for any religious institution, anywhere, I want you to explain something to me.

Why should it be considered acceptable that the loud opinions of a few misguided people in society (the alphabet people), should be the deciding factor for the government forced alteration of the religious belief systems and traditions of the majority, simply because they (the alphabet people) want it and they don't care what it does to the traditional institution of marriage or the people who follow their religious beliefs including their religious teachings regarding marriage?

If thats too much for you to explain, ok. I want you to show me, what religion endorses homosexual marriage, and if such does exist, explain why they don't all just join that particular religion and leave everyone else's religious ceremonies and rituals alone?

Same sex marriage existed in ancient Rome, Greece and the Middle East. Same sex marriages existed the Americas before Columbus.

Good.
Now, show me the following two things.
1- the religious texts that exist today supporting your statements in today's world
2- your time machine.

[maj. tom]

You're basing your beliefs and prejudices on religion and their made up heavily altered whenever they feel like it texts, rather than actual recorded works found by historians and archaeologists?

So these entire fields of study where they found innumerable pieces of evidence of homosexual unions and wrote entire books and papers on it, they all have time machines? I find it strange that the volumes of Encyclopedia didn't mention any of this either.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_same-sex_unions

[adnj]

Anybody who believes that things like "homophobia" and "transphobia" and all those other gender/sexual preference inclined labels exist, is an idiot.

A man may not be willing to engage with a homosexual, but that doesn't mean he has an irrational fear of them. And that's the definition of what a phobia is, a powerful, irrational, illogical fear. Not understanding or tolerating something, is not the same thing as being afraid of it.


These people nowadays, like the true meaning of words mean nothing to them, and lying to themselves and everyone is the new acceptable standard for human interaction today.

Homophobia and transphobia does exist. Explain why alot of religious leaders and a handful of citizens are against having equal rights for LGBTQ+ people. Such as having: Anti-discrimination laws in employment, Anti-discrimination laws in the provision of goods and services, Anti-discrimination laws in all other areas (including indirect discrimination, hate speech), Same-sex marriages, Recognition of same-sex couples, Stepchild adoption by same-sex couples, Joint adoption by same-sex couples and the Right to change legal gender.

It is not about "engaging", it about the open restriction of equal rights to all citizens on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity.

Ok, let's take a logical approach to this. Let's look at marriage to start.
The concept of marriage, is founded primarily in religion, in every country on earth, from its inception, and its only in the last century or so that the state has chosen to get directly and heavily involved in the business of marriages.
Now, in keeping with the understanding that marriage is a religious ritual and is seen that way by the majority, regardless of the states late involvement to use it as a revenue generating business. And also understanding that there's no religious text in existence on this planet today that refers to same sex marriage as being an acceptable option, for any religious institution, anywhere, I want you to explain something to me.

Why should it be considered acceptable that the loud opinions of a few misguided people in society (the alphabet people), should be the deciding factor for the government forced alteration of the religious belief systems and traditions of the majority, simply because they (the alphabet people) want it and they don't care what it does to the traditional institution of marriage or the people who follow their religious beliefs including their religious teachings regarding marriage?

If thats too much for you to explain, ok. I want you to show me, what religion endorses homosexual marriage, and if such does exist, explain why they don't all just join that particular religion and leave everyone else's religious ceremonies and rituals alone?

Same sex marriage existed in ancient Rome, Greece and the Middle East. Same sex marriages existed the Americas before Columbus.

Good.
Now, show me the following two things.
1- the religious texts that exist today supporting your statements in today's world
2- your time machine.

I guess you just choose not to see the obvious.

[88sins]

The only obvious thing about your argument is that it's weak af

Edit

A man asks you about today, but you gone on a ramble about ancient Greece and Columbus

[Dohplaydat]

Look fellas, I doh deal up with all this gender nonsense and feminist BS ideology and thing as well.

Treat everyone with respect yes, but they also have to earn respect and realize that society is not should not give in to their mental illnesses.

That said, the more homosexual men out there the more women available for us.

If them prefer men to women, leave them, they missing out, how that affecting you?

There are homosexual women, too.

The prevalence of male and females homosexuality through the years has not changed much, if at all. Knowing that there are homosexual men is not going to create some new group of women that you believe will suddenly be susceptible to your charms.

They're twice as many gay men than women.

[maj. tom]

That's unlikely. Homosexuality would appear to be random and about equal percentage across all human populations and gender. There is a huge bias on self-reporting homosexuality in women because of the shame factor compared to men. It's much harder for women to internalize and accept homosexuality, even a lot of society dismisses female homosexual encounters as "college experimentation."

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14567655/

[adnj]

The only obvious thing about your argument is that it's weak af

Edit

A man asks you about today, but you gone on a ramble about ancient Greece and Columbus

You're poorly attempting to use the old and tired argument that there is no religious text that sanctions homosexual marriage or relationships when it is the Abrahamic religious texts that specifically vilify homosexuality.

Homosexuality was not unknown in the ancient world. Roman Emperor Nero went so far as to marry a man while Emperor Hadrian had his gay concubine deified.

Confucianism tolerance accepts same sex unions while same sex relationships were common amongst Japanese samurai and Buddhist monks.

Come up with a valid argument that is at least passingly imaginative. It is painful to read the same old tropes and biases presented as new inventions when they're just weak, tired and are less convincing now then when they were first written with ink and quill.

[88sins]

In all your rambling, at no time did you come anywhere near a coherent rational thought.

Answer the question, with a response that is relevant to the question.

[adnj]

In all your rambling, at no time did you come anywhere near a coherent rational thought.

Answer the question, with a response that is relevant to the question.

Homie, do you just keep pushing that boulder up the same hill everyday?

You are using the religious doctrine that codified anti-homosexual restrictions as the justification for the restrictions themselves. There are many valid arguments that can be made regarding those doctrines but you aren't making one.

[88sins]

I noticed, you still can't answer the original question. So I'll simplify it for you.
What makes it ok, in this modern day, for the state to place the wants of the few in a position of greater importance over the majority,, disregarding their traditions and beliefs and norms, when the only real argument that comes from the few is that they lack inclusion?

If yuh can't answer that, shut yuh arse and go and pee and go in yuh bed.

[adnj]

I noticed, you still can't answer the original question. So I'll simplify it for you.
What makes it ok, in this modern day, for the state to place the wants of the few in a position of greater importance over the majority,, disregarding their traditions and beliefs and norms, when the only real argument that comes from the few is that they lack inclusion?

If yuh can't answer that, shut yuh arse and go and pee and go in yuh bed.

Once you remove the religious dogma the question should have been, "Why are some people of the opinion that what other people do with their own lives is perceived by them as an existential threat?"

[st7]

what was this ched about again?