Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
ruffneck_12 wrote:adnj wrote:hover11 wrote:Are we gonna allow this to happen again?FB_IMG_1632002291917.jpg
Umm, this counts as take-away bredda man.
You cannot stand up by the stall and eat anymore.
You really need to come better with the memes. It's funnier when the content is true. I told you this a few pages back.
ruffneck_12 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:All over social media I am seeing the strangest reasons for not taking the vaccine including
• Big pharma is making a lot of money on this
• They are taking away your personal freedom
• This is communism
None of which have any bearing on the fact that the vaccines work.
Yeah they work at preventing you from dying from a virus that you would survive if you took even moderate care of your health.
and They ARE taking away your personal freedom btw, look at austrailia.
It isn't communism, but pretty soon the government's reach will extend far and wide at an attempt to curb this oh so deadly virus.
You creating a Straw Man there mane.
We are trying to prevent communism.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slippery Slopes exist Mr. Duane.
Just because you ain't slide down the mountain, doesn't mean you can't. We need to watch our path (so to speak)
Tuner isn't a public service there snowflake.If Worldboss Duane wants to lock out anybody,he can and well within his rightshover11 wrote:This is a free country no he can't as much as you would like that to happengastly369 wrote:Can you introduce proof of being "vaxxed" to use tuner? Asking for a friendDuane 3NE 2NR wrote:All over social media I am seeing the strangest reasons for not taking the vaccine including
• Big pharma is making a lot of money on this
• They are taking away your personal freedom
• This is communism
None of which have any bearing on the fact that the vaccines work.
sMASH wrote:Jab jab
hover11 wrote:Lifetime subscription to stay alivesMASH wrote:Jab jab FB_IMG_1632054409636.jpg
st7 wrote:hover11 wrote:Lifetime subscription to stay alivesMASH wrote:Jab jab FB_IMG_1632054409636.jpg
People who don't get vaccinated:hover11 wrote:Probably
ed360123 wrote:People who don't get vaccinated:hover11 wrote:Probably
1) Can spread it to people who are physically unable to get vaccinated because of certain medical conditions.
2) If they get Covid, the disease has a higher chance of mutating in them.
Do you not understand what the words 'higher chance' means. Emphasis on *chance*.hover11 wrote:Where is the evidence that the vaccinated cannot cause a mutation as well, unvaxxed and vaxxed share the same viral load thus same possiblityed360123 wrote:People who don't get vaccinated:hover11 wrote:Probably
1) Can spread it to people who are physically unable to get vaccinated because of certain medical conditions.
2) If they get Covid, the disease has a higher chance of mutating in them.
ed360123 wrote:Do you not understand what the words 'higher chance' means. Emphasis on *chance*.hover11 wrote:Where is the evidence that the vaccinated cannot cause a mutation as well, unvaxxed and vaxxed share the same viral load thus same possiblityed360123 wrote:People who don't get vaccinated:hover11 wrote:Probably
1) Can spread it to people who are physically unable to get vaccinated because of certain medical conditions.
2) If they get Covid, the disease has a higher chance of mutating in them.
So you do not understand how probability works then. Got it.hover11 wrote:Exactly so that means it's still an eventuality so instead of saying the unvaccinated have a higher chance , let's say both unvaccinated and vaccinated can spark a mutation simpleed360123 wrote:Do you not understand what the words 'higher chance' means. Emphasis on *chance*.hover11 wrote:Where is the evidence that the vaccinated cannot cause a mutation as well, unvaxxed and vaxxed share the same viral load thus same possiblityed360123 wrote:People who don't get vaccinated:hover11 wrote:Probably
1) Can spread it to people who are physically unable to get vaccinated because of certain medical conditions.
2) If they get Covid, the disease has a higher chance of mutating in them.
ed360123 wrote:So you do not understand how probability works then. Got it.hover11 wrote:Exactly so that means it's still an eventuality so instead of saying the unvaccinated have a higher chance , let's say both unvaccinated and vaccinated can spark a mutation simpleed360123 wrote:Do you not understand what the words 'higher chance' means. Emphasis on *chance*.hover11 wrote:Where is the evidence that the vaccinated cannot cause a mutation as well, unvaxxed and vaxxed share the same viral load thus same possiblityed360123 wrote:People who don't get vaccinated:hover11 wrote:Probably
1) Can spread it to people who are physically unable to get vaccinated because of certain medical conditions.
2) If they get Covid, the disease has a higher chance of mutating in them.
Because it reduces even further the probability that I get Covid. Yes, you are the one that does not understand stats.hover11 wrote:You're the one taking a vaccine for a virus that has a 98 percent survival rate And I'm the one that doesn't get stats....mind blowned360123 wrote:So you do not understand how probability works then. Got it.hover11 wrote:Exactly so that means it's still an eventuality so instead of saying the unvaccinated have a higher chance , let's say both unvaccinated and vaccinated can spark a mutation simpleed360123 wrote:Do you not understand what the words 'higher chance' means. Emphasis on *chance*.hover11 wrote:Where is the evidence that the vaccinated cannot cause a mutation as well, unvaxxed and vaxxed share the same viral load thus same possiblityed360123 wrote:People who don't get vaccinated:hover11 wrote:Probably
1) Can spread it to people who are physically unable to get vaccinated because of certain medical conditions.
2) If they get Covid, the disease has a higher chance of mutating in them.
ed360123 wrote:Because it reduces even further the probability that I get Covid. Yes, you are the one that does not understand stats.hover11 wrote:You're the one taking a vaccine for a virus that has a 98 percent survival rate And I'm the one that doesn't get stats....mind blowned360123 wrote:So you do not understand how probability works then. Got it.hover11 wrote:Exactly so that means it's still an eventuality so instead of saying the unvaccinated have a higher chance , let's say both unvaccinated and vaccinated can spark a mutation simpleed360123 wrote:Do you not understand what the words 'higher chance' means. Emphasis on *chance*.hover11 wrote:Where is the evidence that the vaccinated cannot cause a mutation as well, unvaxxed and vaxxed share the same viral load thus same possiblityed360123 wrote:People who don't get vaccinated:hover11 wrote:Probably
1) Can spread it to people who are physically unable to get vaccinated because of certain medical conditions.
2) If they get Covid, the disease has a higher chance of mutating in them.
So you agree then that more people should be vaccinated?, because then it would be more effective?hover11 wrote:Yet it's only as effective based on a majority of ppl that take it seeking that impossible herd immunityed360123 wrote:Because it reduces even further the probability that I get Covid. Yes, you are the one that does not understand stats.hover11 wrote:You're the one taking a vaccine for a virus that has a 98 percent survival rate And I'm the one that doesn't get stats....mind blowned360123 wrote:So you do not understand how probability works then. Got it.hover11 wrote:Exactly so that means it's still an eventuality so instead of saying the unvaccinated have a higher chance , let's say both unvaccinated and vaccinated can spark a mutation simpleed360123 wrote:Do you not understand what the words 'higher chance' means. Emphasis on *chance*.hover11 wrote:Where is the evidence that the vaccinated cannot cause a mutation as well, unvaxxed and vaxxed share the same viral load thus same possiblityed360123 wrote:People who don't get vaccinated:
1) Can spread it to people who are physically unable to get vaccinated because of certain medical conditions.
2) If they get Covid, the disease has a higher chance of mutating in them.
ed360123 wrote:So you agree then that more people should be vaccinated?hover11 wrote:Yet it's only as effective based on a majority of ppl that take it seeking that impossible herd immunityed360123 wrote:Because it reduces even further the probability that I get Covid. Yes, you are the one that does not understand stats.hover11 wrote:You're the one taking a vaccine for a virus that has a 98 percent survival rate And I'm the one that doesn't get stats....mind blowned360123 wrote:So you do not understand how probability works then. Got it.hover11 wrote:Exactly so that means it's still an eventuality so instead of saying the unvaccinated have a higher chance , let's say both unvaccinated and vaccinated can spark a mutation simpleed360123 wrote:Do you not understand what the words 'higher chance' means. Emphasis on *chance*.hover11 wrote:Where is the evidence that the vaccinated cannot cause a mutation as well, unvaxxed and vaxxed share the same viral load thus same possiblity
That's not even correct. The vaccines do provide around the same level of protection they advertise. But when more people take them, they work even better than advertised, because transmission rates are reduced.hover11 wrote:Nope just pointing out the clear plothole in your logic, you took the vaccine to protect yourself yet it's not as effective because you require others to do the same to maintain the level of advertised protectioned360123 wrote:So you agree then that more people should be vaccinated?hover11 wrote:Yet it's only as effective based on a majority of ppl that take it seeking that impossible herd immunityed360123 wrote:Because it reduces even further the probability that I get Covid. Yes, you are the one that does not understand stats.hover11 wrote:You're the one taking a vaccine for a virus that has a 98 percent survival rate And I'm the one that doesn't get stats....mind blowned360123 wrote:So you do not understand how probability works then. Got it.hover11 wrote:Exactly so that means it's still an eventuality so instead of saying the unvaccinated have a higher chance , let's say both unvaccinated and vaccinated can spark a mutation simpleed360123 wrote:Do you not understand what the words 'higher chance' means. Emphasis on *chance*.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:ruffneck_12 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:All over social media I am seeing the strangest reasons for not taking the vaccine including
• Big pharma is making a lot of money on this
• They are taking away your personal freedom
• This is communism
None of which have any bearing on the fact that the vaccines work.
Yeah they work at preventing you from dying from a virus that you would survive if you took even moderate care of your health.
and They ARE taking away your personal freedom btw, look at austrailia.
It isn't communism, but pretty soon the government's reach will extend far and wide at an attempt to curb this oh so deadly virus.
You creating a Straw Man there mane.
We are trying to prevent communism.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slippery Slopes exist Mr. Duane.
Just because you ain't slide down the mountain, doesn't mean you can't. We need to watch our path (so to speak)
You think there is some global conspiracy to introduce communism in every country?
Regardless though - the virus does not have the ability to care about human rights or your freedom of choice any more than gravity cares if you choose to jump out a plane without a parachute. Your body, your choice?
The virus is killing millions of people without care and can kill millions more so we shouldn't conflate strong medical advice with communism.
ruffneck_12 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:ruffneck_12 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:All over social media I am seeing the strangest reasons for not taking the vaccine including
• Big pharma is making a lot of money on this
• They are taking away your personal freedom
• This is communism
None of which have any bearing on the fact that the vaccines work.
Yeah they work at preventing you from dying from a virus that you would survive if you took even moderate care of your health.
and They ARE taking away your personal freedom btw, look at austrailia.
It isn't communism, but pretty soon the government's reach will extend far and wide at an attempt to curb this oh so deadly virus.
You creating a Straw Man there mane.
We are trying to prevent communism.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Slippery Slopes exist Mr. Duane.
Just because you ain't slide down the mountain, doesn't mean you can't. We need to watch our path (so to speak)
You think there is some global conspiracy to introduce communism in every country?
Regardless though - the virus does not have the ability to care about human rights or your freedom of choice any more than gravity cares if you choose to jump out a plane without a parachute. Your body, your choice?
The virus is killing millions of people without care and can kill millions more so we shouldn't conflate strong medical advice with communism.
Not reeally communism, just more control. Fear can control someone better than reward.
You notice how much facts they leave out right? 97% survival rate in an unhealthy population like ours. The survival rate is much higher in healthier populations.
You realise how they aren't showing the LARGE protests that's happening in Austrailia and France but they'll glamorize Nicki Minaj to bash her? How come the news will prioritize certain headlines over others?
Up to now they'll tell you how many unvaxxed people died....
but they won't tell you how many overweight people died
hover11 wrote:Whats your purpose ?st7 wrote:hover11 wrote:Lifetime subscription to stay alivesMASH wrote:Jab jab FB_IMG_1632054409636.jpg
hover11 wrote:Where is the evidence that the vaccinated cannot cause a mutation as well, unvaxxed and vaxxed share the same viral load thus same possiblityed360123 wrote:People who don't get vaccinated:hover11 wrote:Probably FB_IMG_1632058731495.jpg
1) Can spread it to people who are physically unable to get vaccinated because of certain medical conditions.
2) If they get Covid, the disease has a higher chance of mutating in them.
st7 wrote:hover11 wrote:Where is the evidence that the vaccinated cannot cause a mutation as well, unvaxxed and vaxxed share the same viral load thus same possiblityed360123 wrote:People who don't get vaccinated:hover11 wrote:Probably FB_IMG_1632058731495.jpg
1) Can spread it to people who are physically unable to get vaccinated because of certain medical conditions.
2) If they get Covid, the disease has a higher chance of mutating in them.
please show us the evidence that the vaccinated can cause a mutation.
thanks.
ed360123 wrote:That's not even correct. The vaccines do provide around the same level of protection they advertise. But when more people take them, they work even better than advertised, because transmission rates are reduced.hover11 wrote:Nope just pointing out the clear plothole in your logic, you took the vaccine to protect yourself yet it's not as effective because you require others to do the same to maintain the level of advertised protectioned360123 wrote:So you agree then that more people should be vaccinated?hover11 wrote:Yet it's only as effective based on a majority of ppl that take it seeking that impossible herd immunityed360123 wrote:Because it reduces even further the probability that I get Covid. Yes, you are the one that does not understand stats.hover11 wrote:You're the one taking a vaccine for a virus that has a 98 percent survival rate And I'm the one that doesn't get stats....mind blowned360123 wrote:So you do not understand how probability works then. Got it.hover11 wrote:Exactly so that means it's still an eventuality so instead of saying the unvaccinated have a higher chance , let's say both unvaccinated and vaccinated can spark a mutation simple
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 12 guests