Flow
Flow
TriniTuner.com  |  Latest Event:  

Forums

PEP Policy Discussion

this is how we do it.......

Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 25585
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: PEP Policy Discussion

Postby sMASH » March 13th, 2019, 9:34 am

it has to be defense cause 'know hm very well' 'well known back in the day' that is the gist of all the files that people bussing.

so, the sum total for persons who did not grow up in north, and not around in the 80's, all we know, is the valid issues he is raising.

and after hearing the list of charges against him, we still end up knowing nothing.

i heard that expo ting raised. what about that expo?... talk about it instead of pelting corn hoping it fall in garden. relate the story,

i know rowley take 3m and give his daughter to spend on paintings, i know he take 1.5m and give cuffie for his foreign treatment, i know kamla give out box drain like wow, for monies like wow, but the ting looking like piper build it. i know 2m spent on a flag and polce. i know 9m spent on wrecking services for a 2m fire truck.

the most i hear is, expo. what about the expo? ..........expo, *if u dont know, then hard luck, we not tellin yuh*

reboot2020
Ricer
Posts: 22
Joined: February 20th, 2019, 4:36 pm

Re: PEP Policy Discussion

Postby reboot2020 » January 8th, 2020, 10:18 am












User avatar
VexXx Dogg
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 16815
Joined: May 1st, 2003, 10:23 am
Location: ☠☠☠

Re: PEP Policy Discussion

Postby VexXx Dogg » January 8th, 2020, 11:29 am

Classic populist rhetoric, I see.

**Only watched the one on housing. Will take in the rest later.

User avatar
Dizzy28
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 18912
Joined: February 8th, 2010, 8:54 am
Location: People's Republic of Bananas

Re: PEP Policy Discussion

Postby Dizzy28 » January 8th, 2020, 11:54 am

VexXx Dogg wrote:Classic populist rhetoric, I see.

**Only watched the one on housing. Will take in the rest later.


With an electorate as unrefined and polarized as ours anyone seriously trying to contend would have to be populist.

I fail to see why PEP can't be an attractive proposition in an election b/c the argument he is tainted when the current crop of 41 sitting in Tower D has among others -
Camille "dont know how to use a credit card or fill our a source of funds" Regis,
Rental Rawi,
Darrel Epstein I mean Smith,
Rohan "the luckiest land owner in Trinidad" Sinanan
Keith Landate Rowley [who also is the real OG when it comes to ride or die for his soldiers]
Food Card Jennings
Burkie Mcdonald
Edmund "Manhattan" Dillon

Suruj "Maybe a doctor maybe not" Rambachan
Coonilal Monilal (Let Randull put in whatever accusation for him)
Ganga "TTPost/Desalcott/Incogen" Singh

TBH now that I look at it the UNC 18 not looking all that bad having cut Warner, Gypsy etc as compared to the virtual Suicide Squad the PNM have, even discounting for idiots like Stewie, Lovie etc.

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 25585
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: PEP Policy Discussion

Postby sMASH » January 8th, 2020, 12:00 pm

mind listing out the UNC slate? im not up to scratch

User avatar
Dizzy28
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 18912
Joined: February 8th, 2010, 8:54 am
Location: People's Republic of Bananas

Re: PEP Policy Discussion

Postby Dizzy28 » January 8th, 2020, 12:34 pm

sMASH wrote:mind listing out the UNC slate? im not up to scratch



1 Barataria/San Juan Fuad Khan (PP/UNC)
2 Caroni Central Bhoendradatt Tewarie (PP/UNC)
3 Caroni East Tim Gopeesingh (PP/UNC)
4 Chaguanas East Fazal Karim (PP/UNC)
5 Chaguanas West Ganga Singh (PP/UNC)
6 Couva North Ramona Ramdial (PP/UNC)
7 Couva South Rudranath Indarsingh (PP/UNC)
8 Cumuto/Manzanilla Christine Newallo-Hosein (PP/UNC)
9 Fyzabad Lackram Bodoe (PP/UNC)
10 Mayaro Rushton Paray (PP/UNC)
11 Naparima Rodney Charles (PP/UNC)
12 Oropouche East Roodal Moonilal (PP/UNC)
13 Oropouche West Vidia Gayadeen-Goopeesingh (PP/UNC)
14 Pointe-a-Pierre David Lee (PP/UNC) - Opposition Chief Whip
15 Princes Town Barry Padarath (PP/UNC)
16 Siparia Kamla Persad-Bissessar (PP/UNC) - Leader of the Opposition
17 St. Augustine Prakash Ramadhar (PP/COP)
18 Tabaquite Surujrattan Rambachan (PP/UNC)

User avatar
VexXx Dogg
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 16815
Joined: May 1st, 2003, 10:23 am
Location: ☠☠☠

Re: PEP Policy Discussion

Postby VexXx Dogg » January 8th, 2020, 1:12 pm

Dizzy28 wrote:
VexXx Dogg wrote:Classic populist rhetoric, I see.

**Only watched the one on housing. Will take in the rest later.


With an electorate as unrefined and polarized as ours anyone seriously trying to contend would have to be populist.

I fail to see why PEP can't be an attractive proposition in an election b/c the argument he is tainted when the current crop of 41 sitting in Tower D has among others -
Camille "dont know how to use a credit card or fill our a source of funds" Regis,
Rental Rawi,
Darrel Epstein I mean Smith,
Rohan "the luckiest land owner in Trinidad" Sinanan
Keith Landate Rowley [who also is the real OG when it comes to ride or die for his soldiers]
Food Card Jennings
Burkie Mcdonald
Edmund "Manhattan" Dillon

Suruj "Maybe a doctor maybe not" Rambachan
Coonilal Monilal (Let Randull put in whatever accusation for him)
Ganga "TTPost/Desalcott/Incogen" Singh

TBH now that I look at it the UNC 18 not looking all that bad having cut Warner, Gypsy etc as compared to the virtual Suicide Squad the PNM have, even discounting for idiots like Stewie, Lovie etc.


My issue with that is the basis of the populist policies will be fundamentally flawed if it punishes the 'rich' because of the assumption that they are all corrupt.

The 'rich' being anyone who's not poor, since we doh have a middle class anymore.

Poor good, rich bad? Am I oversimplifying their vision?

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 25585
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: PEP Policy Discussion

Postby sMASH » January 8th, 2020, 3:09 pm

Dizzy28 wrote:
sMASH wrote:mind listing out the UNC slate? im not up to scratch



1 Barataria/San Juan Fuad Khan (PP/UNC)
2 Caroni Central Bhoendradatt Tewarie (PP/UNC)
3 Caroni East Tim Gopeesingh (PP/UNC)
4 Chaguanas East Fazal Karim (PP/UNC)
5 Chaguanas West Ganga Singh (PP/UNC)
6 Couva North Ramona Ramdial (PP/UNC)
7 Couva South Rudranath Indarsingh (PP/UNC)
8 Cumuto/Manzanilla Christine Newallo-Hosein (PP/UNC)
9 Fyzabad Lackram Bodoe (PP/UNC)
10 Mayaro Rushton Paray (PP/UNC)
11 Naparima Rodney Charles (PP/UNC)
12 Oropouche East Roodal Moonilal (PP/UNC)
13 Oropouche West Vidia Gayadeen-Goopeesingh (PP/UNC)
14 Pointe-a-Pierre David Lee (PP/UNC) - Opposition Chief Whip
15 Princes Town Barry Padarath (PP/UNC)
16 Siparia Kamla Persad-Bissessar (PP/UNC) - Leader of the Opposition
17 St. Augustine Prakash Ramadhar (PP/COP)
18 Tabaquite Surujrattan Rambachan (PP/UNC)


better than the balisier slate, but some ah dem... i have some apprehensions.

User avatar
j.o.e
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 7411
Joined: October 5th, 2008, 8:56 pm
Location: On tuner

Re: PEP Policy Discussion

Postby j.o.e » January 8th, 2020, 3:22 pm

Please remember Anil ‘Lifesport’ Roberts is back in the UNC fold

User avatar
zoom rader
TunerGod
Posts: 30518
Joined: April 22nd, 2003, 12:39 pm
Location: Grand Cayman

Re: PEP Policy Discussion

Postby zoom rader » January 8th, 2020, 3:27 pm

Dizzy28 wrote:
sMASH wrote:mind listing out the UNC slate? im not up to scratch



1 Barataria/San Juan Fuad Khan (PP/UNC)
2 Caroni Central Bhoendradatt Tewarie (PP/UNC)
3 Caroni East Tim Gopeesingh (PP/UNC)
4 Chaguanas East Fazal Karim (PP/UNC)
5 Chaguanas West Ganga Singh (PP/UNC)
6 Couva North Ramona Ramdial (PP/UNC)
7 Couva South Rudranath Indarsingh (PP/UNC)
8 Cumuto/Manzanilla Christine Newallo-Hosein (PP/UNC)
9 Fyzabad Lackram Bodoe (PP/UNC)
10 Mayaro Rushton Paray (PP/UNC)
11 Naparima Rodney Charles (PP/UNC)
12 Oropouche East Roodal Moonilal (PP/UNC)
13 Oropouche West Vidia Gayadeen-Goopeesingh (PP/UNC)
14 Pointe-a-Pierre David Lee (PP/UNC) - Opposition Chief Whip
15 Princes Town Barry Padarath (PP/UNC)
16 Siparia Kamla Persad-Bissessar (PP/UNC) - Leader of the Opposition
17 St. Augustine Prakash Ramadhar (PP/COP)
18 Tabaquite Surujrattan Rambachan (PP/UNC)
If a foreigner saw those names he would may want to know what part of India is this.

Then agian when you visit the TT embassies abroad you begin to think that what part of Africa is this

krai888
Riding on 13's
Posts: 3
Joined: January 8th, 2020, 7:51 pm

Re: PEP Policy Discussion

Postby krai888 » January 8th, 2020, 7:55 pm

and I thought the green new deal was extreme.

User avatar
j.o.e
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 7411
Joined: October 5th, 2008, 8:56 pm
Location: On tuner

Re: PEP Policy Discussion

Postby j.o.e » January 8th, 2020, 8:22 pm

Who are the other senior ppl in PEP? I don’t attend meetings but seems like a one man show. Genuinely curious

User avatar
Dohplaydat
3ne2nr Toppa Toppa
Posts: 5150
Joined: December 17th, 2019, 8:31 pm

Re: PEP Policy Discussion

Postby Dohplaydat » January 8th, 2020, 8:57 pm

j.o.e wrote:Who are the other senior ppl in PEP? I don’t attend meetings but seems like a one man show. Genuinely curious


I gave PEP a chance, but a lot of them are just..... How to put this lightly..... Too inepth to know that they're not cut out for this.

Intelligence, social skills and being realistic are important traits in politics for many reasons. PEP seems really really naive in many ways. I don't want to bash them because what they're doing is still commendable, but honestly I would not vote for them.

I have my issues with UNC but as a government they're quite effective.

K_J_R
3NE 2NR for life
Posts: 246
Joined: January 11th, 2015, 12:43 pm

Re: PEP Policy Discussion

Postby K_J_R » January 9th, 2020, 11:19 am

i am confused, i thought this PEA fella left the party?

so what he come back now?

http://www.looptt.com/content/pep-leade ... cal-career

K74T
TunerGod
Posts: 21561
Joined: June 7th, 2010, 11:01 pm

Re: PEP Policy Discussion

Postby K74T » January 11th, 2020, 8:27 pm

FB_IMG_1578788775107.jpeg


Who out deyyy

rspann
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 11165
Joined: June 25th, 2010, 10:23 pm
Location: Trinituner 24/7

Re: PEP Policy Discussion

Postby rspann » January 11th, 2020, 8:30 pm

Nah. I red and ready.

User avatar
VexXx Dogg
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 16815
Joined: May 1st, 2003, 10:23 am
Location: ☠☠☠

Re: PEP Policy Discussion

Postby VexXx Dogg » January 11th, 2020, 9:49 pm

K74T wrote:FB_IMG_1578788775107.jpeg

Who out deyyy


They musbe need deposit money

K74T
TunerGod
Posts: 21561
Joined: June 7th, 2010, 11:01 pm

Re: PEP Policy Discussion

Postby K74T » January 23rd, 2020, 3:18 pm

reboot2020/PEA, yuh sticking dey bigman.

FB_IMG_1579807016693.jpeg



OP sponsoring the after march lime by Trotters after, might be a small crowd.

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 25585
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: PEP Policy Discussion

Postby sMASH » January 29th, 2020, 10:24 pm



this is real democracy at work.

User avatar
VexXx Dogg
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 16815
Joined: May 1st, 2003, 10:23 am
Location: ☠☠☠

Re: PEP Policy Discussion

Postby VexXx Dogg » January 30th, 2020, 8:49 am

sMASH wrote:

this is real democracy at work.


How so?

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 25585
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: PEP Policy Discussion

Postby sMASH » January 30th, 2020, 8:50 am

^^ people, citizens dictating the pace of the country, and getting it done... not some elites in offices.

User avatar
VexXx Dogg
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 16815
Joined: May 1st, 2003, 10:23 am
Location: ☠☠☠

Re: PEP Policy Discussion

Postby VexXx Dogg » January 30th, 2020, 9:02 am

sMASH wrote:^^ people, citizens dictating the pace of the country, and getting it done... not some elites in offices.

Fair enough.

I saw it as a call to action by a militia leader under the guise of a peaceful protest - easily escalatable to a runaway mob.

Kinda like if Abu-Bakr lead a 100k person march in POS to protest and said it's going to be non-violent (winkwink)

The fact that the government did not counter the march is indeed good from a democratic perspective.

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 25585
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: PEP Policy Discussion

Postby sMASH » January 30th, 2020, 9:21 am

History is written by the Victor.
What gets written depends on the aftermath.

If the US pulls out, he would be a champion.
If the US does not and strike him down, he would be a rebel dissident, that was neutralized.


At the end, would it be what thd people want, or the US military?

Ben_spanna
punchin NOS
Posts: 3064
Joined: October 28th, 2016, 9:25 am

Re: PEP Policy Discussion

Postby Ben_spanna » January 30th, 2020, 12:40 pm

Dohplaydat wrote:
j.o.e wrote:Who are the other senior ppl in PEP? I don’t attend meetings but seems like a one man show. Genuinely curious


I gave PEP a chance, but a lot of them are just..... How to put this lightly..... Too inepth to know that they're not cut out for this.

Intelligence, social skills and being realistic are important traits in politics for many reasons. PEP seems really really naive in many ways. I don't want to bash them because what they're doing is still commendable, but honestly I would not vote for them.

I have my issues with UNC but as a government they're quite effective.


Every young politician has to start somewhere, they need to learn as they go along, neither of the 2 main parties started with brilliance.
Yes i know its a hard place to decide whom to vote into power, but arent you truly FEDUP of the MASS dishonesty, corruption and blatent racism that is currently plaguing our politican ?

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 25585
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: PEP Policy Discussion

Postby sMASH » January 30th, 2020, 1:33 pm

With the economy the way it is, we need a hail Mary, not a measured incrementalist approach.

My first option is pep, and second is unc.

User avatar
Slartibartfast
punchin NOS
Posts: 4650
Joined: May 15th, 2012, 4:24 pm
Location: Magrathea

Re: PEP Policy Discussion

Postby Slartibartfast » January 30th, 2020, 3:07 pm

Our democracy is broken because we are not using it properly. We vote based on who we think will win the next election which is the dumbest thing we can do. This is why 3rd parties cannot get a proper foothold.

All you need to do is vote for who you think is best even if you are 100% sure that they will lose. Let your vote actually count. If the 3rd parties we have start getting more support then we will get better candidates as people figure out that it's not a waste of their time to go up for elections.

But please refrain from voting for UNC because you don't want PNM to win. The opposite happened last elections and the PNM are still convinced that we are in support of them because the only metric the have to accurately measure support for them shows it to be that way.

So vote for PEP if you think they are best, or MSJ or Progressive Party or whoever. Just stop voting for the "lesser of two evils" or else we will never get out of this spiral.

User avatar
sMASH
TunerGod
Posts: 25585
Joined: January 11th, 2005, 4:30 am

Re: PEP Policy Discussion

Postby sMASH » January 30th, 2020, 3:57 pm

we still suffer from too many tribal mentality

User avatar
VexXx Dogg
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 16815
Joined: May 1st, 2003, 10:23 am
Location: ☠☠☠

Re: PEP Policy Discussion

Postby VexXx Dogg » February 1st, 2020, 9:27 pm

Slartibartfast wrote:Our democracy is broken because we are not using it properly. We vote based on who we think will win the next election which is the dumbest thing we can do. This is why 3rd parties cannot get a proper foothold.

All you need to do is vote for who you think is best even if you are 100% sure that they will lose. Let your vote actually count. If the 3rd parties we have start getting more support then we will get better candidates as people figure out that it's not a waste of their time to go up for elections.

But please refrain from voting for UNC because you don't want PNM to win. The opposite happened last elections and the PNM are still convinced that we are in support of them because the only metric the have to accurately measure support for them shows it to be that way.

So vote for PEP if you think they are best, or MSJ or Progressive Party or whoever. Just stop voting for the "lesser of two evils" or else we will never get out of this spiral.

Tried that with COP, tbh.
they looked the most promising, they talked the talk, they walked the walk until they did that foolishness with the PP

The difference between the COP and the PEP is chalk and cheese. I'm not an ecomonist nor a political scientist, but from my limited understanding on finance and pragmatic governance, the PEP's spiel is mostly nonsense.

If another party can come with the same weight, experience and sense like the COP did.....we might have a viable third contender. Right now, the PEP have a better chance than the COP tbh, and that's saying lots - considering I can pretty much predict a loss of deposit for each orange candidate.

User avatar
Slartibartfast
punchin NOS
Posts: 4650
Joined: May 15th, 2012, 4:24 pm
Location: Magrathea

Re: PEP Policy Discussion

Postby Slartibartfast » February 3rd, 2020, 8:58 am

VexXx Dogg wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:Our democracy is broken because we are not using it properly. We vote based on who we think will win the next election which is the dumbest thing we can do. This is why 3rd parties cannot get a proper foothold.

All you need to do is vote for who you think is best even if you are 100% sure that they will lose. Let your vote actually count. If the 3rd parties we have start getting more support then we will get better candidates as people figure out that it's not a waste of their time to go up for elections.

But please refrain from voting for UNC because you don't want PNM to win. The opposite happened last elections and the PNM are still convinced that we are in support of them because the only metric the have to accurately measure support for them shows it to be that way.

So vote for PEP if you think they are best, or MSJ or Progressive Party or whoever. Just stop voting for the "lesser of two evils" or else we will never get out of this spiral.

Tried that with COP, tbh.
they looked the most promising, they talked the talk, they walked the walk until they did that foolishness with the PP

The difference between the COP and the PEP is chalk and cheese. I'm not an ecomonist nor a political scientist, but from my limited understanding on finance and pragmatic governance, the PEP's spiel is mostly nonsense.

If another party can come with the same weight, experience and sense like the COP did.....we might have a viable third contender. Right now, the PEP have a better chance than the COP tbh, and that's saying lots - considering I can pretty much predict a loss of deposit for each orange candidate.
COP did more harm than good in the end. What they did with the PP made people lose hope in third parties and basically secured power for UNC/PNM for the next decade.

But at the end of the day, we are going to have to start using the democratic system the way it is meant to be used and stop voting based on outcome. We already tried UNC and PNM, both of which have shown that that they unfit to represent us so it is time we start moving on to other alternatives. UNC/PNM not going to try to represent us if they know they can get what they want without doing it.

User avatar
VexXx Dogg
TriniTuner 24-7
Posts: 16815
Joined: May 1st, 2003, 10:23 am
Location: ☠☠☠

Re: PEP Policy Discussion

Postby VexXx Dogg » February 3rd, 2020, 9:10 am

I had some older research from about 10 years ago on the democratic systems and a couple alternatives jumped out.

The westminster democracy, or the variant that we have is a dead end IMHO. We keep beating a dead horse and making the same mistakes and expect different outcomes.

When I was reading, I found Lijphart's work on consocationalism and consensus democracies to be quite interesting. The experts can chime in here.

Advertisement

Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests