Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
PariaMan wrote:Once people have a choice they will probably take the one paying higher interest. Makes sense. Does not understand the bait context88sins wrote:PariaMan wrote:Maybe less than inflation but compared to the interest banks and other financial institutions offering it is much better
sounding like bait to see who they could ketch
sMASH wrote:It sounds good, like herbal life..
shogun wrote:What really wrong with Kams though?
All she had to do was hush, or put out a measured reasonable disagreement with the governments fiscal plans and gain a couple political points off the public's skepticism of this move... she couldn't even do that? Instead she opted to come off desperate and unhinged from reality. She has no one advising her, or chiming in on public statements? She knows she's still the head of her party, right?
Papers today say they should have extra from dividends. Not all companies are on tfhe Stock Market so I have to go with their figure.pugboy wrote:I am curious also to how they propping that dividend % rate
I own all those stocks individually and off the top of my head
I think only witco comes close
It’s not hard to get the past data or just call a stock broker
pugboy wrote:I am curious also to how they propping that dividend % rate
I own all those stocks individually and off the top of my head
I think only witco comes close
It’s not hard to get the past data or just call a stock broker
PariaMan wrote:Papers today say they should have extra from dividends. Not all companies are on tfhe Stock Market so I have to go with their figure.pugboy wrote:I am curious also to how they propping that dividend % rate
I own all those stocks individually and off the top of my head
I think only witco comes close
It’s not hard to get the past data or just call a stock broker
My problem is that they giving companies a tax break on dividends earned
Why not make a certain amount into a tax incentive for the small man. Similar to how the credit union incentive used to work
Say maybe the first 30000
Papers to day claim.that they will have about 120 million extra per year to put in a sinking fund towards paying back capital.88sins wrote:PariaMan wrote:Papers today say they should have extra from dividends. Not all companies are on tfhe Stock Market so I have to go with their figure.pugboy wrote:I am curious also to how they propping that dividend % rate
I own all those stocks individually and off the top of my head
I think only witco comes close
It’s not hard to get the past data or just call a stock broker
My problem is that they giving companies a tax break on dividends earned
Why not make a certain amount into a tax incentive for the small man. Similar to how the credit union incentive used to work
Say maybe the first 30000
4/5 are traded on the TTSE, the exception being TGU
wickedtuna wrote:Is the return like 4% ....on 1000 that's $40 ......
pugboy wrote:The prospectus lists the figures for a few years
2017 are:
Angostura dividend yield 1.75%
One Carib media 6%
Republic 4.5%
Tgu no history
Witco 6%
These dividend figures are higher than what I recalled in an earlier post and well are correct
Simply for the fact that share prices have plummeted last few years a lot more relative to the dividends paid so the yield/price %
Obviously would be higher with lower share price
Redman wrote:I don't think the funds received from the sale of the bonds go to the companies.
The money repays GORTT for the cl bailout.
The equity in the companies is vested in nif,NIF raises the 4b.
GORTT gets its money back.
The NIF is raising capital..not the companies.
pugboy wrote:So in five years when the bond matures
They need to find money to repay the bond amount eg $1000 plus the $45 interest
They gonna have to unrepay that gortt somehowRedman wrote:I don't think the funds received from the sale of the bonds go to the companies.
The money repays GORTT for the cl bailout.
The equity in the companies is vested in nif,NIF raises the 4b.
GORTT gets its money back.
The NIF is raising capital..not the companies.
Exactly . It will be a safe investment. It gives a guaranteed dividend which I believe is more that current fixed depositspugboy wrote:yes, a payback later scenes
if the share prices go up buyers will lose out on increased asset value compared to somebody who bought the actual shares directly
I believe the shares are also unguaranteed
I dont think it is a risky investment but one should look at it as a 5 year fixed deposit and compare to other offerings on the market
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: alfa and 42 guests