Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
pugboy wrote:kudos to him, in our culture few ever resign after doing crap
seems his replacement is also an armyman
not sure why there seems to be an assumption that army folks are good for these kinds of things as well as crime fighting
stev wrote:Deputy CEO, not CEO?
*$kїđž![emoji769] wrote:I wonder if he had any communication issues when letting the minister know he was resigning......
I am sure he was told either resign and get your benefits or be fired and get nothing.....
Can't imagine this man thought the nation would be so dotish to accept his dumb ass explanation .....and imagine it still have idiots like that running our organisation s which we don't even know about...
K74T wrote:
hong kong phooey wrote:Hard luck fella . them bosses hang you out to dry
you stick to your directives given as a good soldier boy but them turn left on you
Big of you to apologize , but you were only doing what you were told to do.
88sins wrote:hong kong phooey wrote:Hard luck fella . them bosses hang you out to dry
you stick to your directives given as a good soldier boy but them turn left on you
Big of you to apologize , but you were only doing what you were told to do.
yuh cyah be sreious. Bosses hang him out to dry?
Of his own volition, the man made a monumental foot in mouth statement to the media clearly displaying his perception of the plight of those suffering flood damage, which is that the losses people suffered were neither substantial nor significant & that they could be easily overcome. One thing you don't do as a disaster management officer, regardless of position is disregard anyone's distress as a minor insignificant incident, & that's exactly what he did. he is far removed from the suffering of the people the organization he heads supposed to be aiding, so he should be far removed from his position as well.
& imhpo, he doesn't gain any points for resigning either. If he wanted to resign, he'd have done it the next day. To wait so long after to resign, it's because he was told to do so. Nobody should gain merit on having to be instructed to remedy a debacle they themselves created. So what's next? People gonna expect a trophy or an award for wiping their own asses?
88sins wrote:hong kong phooey wrote:Hard luck fella . them bosses hang you out to dry
you stick to your directives given as a good soldier boy but them turn left on you
Big of you to apologize , but you were only doing what you were told to do.
yuh cyah be sreious. Bosses hang him out to dry?
Of his own volition, the man made a monumental foot in mouth statement to the media clearly displaying his perception of the plight of those suffering flood damage, which is that the losses people suffered were neither substantial nor significant & that they could be easily overcome. One thing you don't do as a disaster management officer, regardless of position is disregard anyone's distress as a minor insignificant incident, & that's exactly what he did. he is far removed from the suffering of the people the organization he heads supposed to be aiding, so he should be far removed from his position as well.
& imhpo, he doesn't gain any points for resigning either. If he wanted to resign, he'd have done it the next day. To wait so long after to resign, it's because he was told to do so. Nobody should gain merit on having to be instructed to remedy a debacle they themselves created. So what's next? People gonna expect a trophy or an award for wiping their own asses?
toyolink wrote:Brings back memories of a management style characterized by the term 'creative inertia'.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: The_Honourable and 28 guests