Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
probably very true. When Columbus found the new world, the Amerindians were wiped out. If a more advanced race reaches earth, we will be the Amerindians.Mr. Tony Stark wrote:I think they should just stop investigating it and we should ask our allied forces to ready their nuclear weapons, because I think if they coming here, trust and believe, they are coming to kill us!, If you all think they coming from soo far to say "we come in peace" .... Yuh lie
they might be 95 light years away, but who's to say what hyper/warp drive they would have and how long their average lifespan would be that 95 years may be nothing for them.EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:^ they cannot reach us, too far away. So we safe
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:probably very true. When Columbus found the new world, the Amerindians were wiped out. If a more advanced race reaches earth, we will be the Amerindians.Mr. Tony Stark wrote:I think they should just stop investigating it and we should ask our allied forces to ready their nuclear weapons, because I think if they coming here, trust and believe, they are coming to kill us!, If you all think they coming from soo far to say "we come in peace" .... Yuh lie
Perhaps even if they do come in peace, diseases they carry (that could be a simple flu for them) could wipe out our entire human population.they might be 95 light years away, but who's to say what hyper/warp drive they would have and how long their average lifespan would be that 95 years may be nothing for them.EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:^ they cannot reach us, too far away. So we safe
If they detected that we picked up their signal in 2015 and set off for earth right away, at warp 9.x they could be here by the year 2110.
If they had a wormhole, they could be here tomorrow, or already.
seti@home wrote:Unread Message 1813506 - Posted: 29 Aug 2016, 17:50:30 UTC
Last modified: 29 Aug 2016, 17:52:24 UTC
I'm sure that many of you have seen the news reports of a "SETI signal" detected from the star HD 164595
I was one of the many people who received the the email with the subject "Candidate SETI SIGNAL DETECTED by Russians from star HD 164595 by virtue of RATAN-600 radio telescope." Since the email did come from known SETI researchers, I looked over the presentation. I was unimpressed. In one out of 39 scans that passed over star showed a signal at about 4.5 times the mean noise power with a profile somewhat like the beam profile. Of course SETI@home has seen millions of potential signals with similar characteristics, but it takes more than that to make a good candidate. Multiple detections are a minimum criterion.
Because the receivers used were making broad band measurements, there's really nothing about this "signal" that would distinguish it from a natural radio transient (stellar flare, active galactic nucleus, microlensing of a background source, etc.) There's also nothing that could distinguish it from a satellite passing through the telescope field of view. All in all, it's relatively uninteresting from a SETI standpoint.
But, of course, it's been announced to the media. Reporters won't have the background to know it's not interesting. Because the media has it, and since this business runs on media, everyone will look at it. ATA is looking at it. I assume Breakthrough will look at it. Someone will look at it with Arecibo, and we'll be along for the ride. And I'll check the SETI@home database around that position. And we'll all find nothing. It's not our first time at this rodeo, so we know how it works.
seti@home wrote:Unread Message 1813608 - Posted: 29 Aug 2016, 21:34:47 UTC - in response to Message 1813586.
We believe a signal when
It is persistent. It appears at the same spot in the sky in multiple observations.
It only comes from one spot in the sky.
If we reobserve the target, the signal is still there.
Things that add to believability
Its frequency/period/delay does not correspond to known interference.
Its Doppler Drift rate indicates that it is exactly frequency stable in the frame of the center of mass of the solar system
Its properties (bandwidth, chirp rate, encoding) indicate intelligent origin.
Unfortunately the observing method used by the Russian team does not permit many of these things to be determine. 1. The signal was not persistent. 2. The signal was gone when the target was reobserved. 3. The signal frequency/period/delay cannot be determined. 4. The signal Doppler drift rate is unknown. 5. Many sources of interference, including satellites, are present in the observing band.
sMASH wrote:seti@home wrote:Unread Message 1813608 - Posted: 29 Aug 2016, 21:34:47 UTC - in response to Message 1813586.
We believe a signal when
It is persistent. It appears at the same spot in the sky in multiple observations.
It only comes from one spot in the sky.
If we reobserve the target, the signal is still there.
sry Darran
“The signal is provocative enough that the RATAN-600 researchers are calling for permanent monitoring of this target,” said Gilster. And that’s exactly what is transpiring. As of last night, the SETI institute is diverting its Allen Telescope Array in northern California to investigate while their counterparts at METI International (Messaging Extraterrestrial Intelligence) will use Panama’s Boquete Optical Observatory.
TheOwnerPO wrote:^Could be this "made this up" to justify the billions spent and funded behind their research. idk...I would like to believe it's real though, would make things a bit more exciting and interesting.
TheOwnerPO wrote:^Could be this "made this up" to justify the billions spent and funded behind their research. idk...I would like to believe it's real though, would make things a bit more exciting and interesting.
they found it in 2015 cause they looked there in 2015.EFFECTIC DESIGNS wrote:So neighbor who does drink rum whole day made a fairly good point, how come all the time they didn't pick up anything like this but all of a sudden they did? This could just be to create hype.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:ED and his neighbour is the same person
Ronaldo95163 wrote:Wonder how it would be to beatout a sweet alien ting tho
MaxPower wrote:Rattan's making telescope now?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests