Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
drchaos wrote:You go end up buying an A class with 100% financing.
adnj wrote:Exactly the point. An operator wants legislation to increase profitability when the marketer does not want to modify their own outlet to increase revenue and profitability. There is a retirement cost associated with closing a fuel station due to the aging of the tanks. It is less than the cost of tank and pump replacement. It is usually cost prohibitive to keep old standalone stations open as opposed to opening a new station.
willing to bet is just slackness have most of them sufferer gas station sufferin. Stop limin down the islands every day and go monitor and improve yuh fkin store.
Redman wrote:willing to bet is just slackness have most of them sufferer gas station sufferin. Stop limin down the islands every day and go monitor and improve yuh fkin store.
What basis do you have for this statement?
Understand something.
The structures and models that the stations are run result in a very bureaucratic process to do anything.
NP will own the pumps,tanks,fuel monitoring etc.
So if the pumps are breaking down-you wait on NP to repair.
NP supplies-you wait for them to supply.
Your price and margin are regulated
You cant change the product.
and you locked into a contract.
I know one owner that began preventative maintenance on the pumps-at his cost belts,filters hoses all changed out before failure-so down time was minimized.
He was sanctioned and instructed to stop.NP accused him of rigging the pumps(no proof).
the PDA has been lobbying for a rationalization of the industry for years-pre 2010.
THe industry needs to be restructured...with the Marketing companies getting out of the ownership of stations.
Redman wrote:willing to bet is just slackness have most of them sufferer gas station sufferin. Stop limin down the islands every day and go monitor and improve yuh fkin store.
What basis do you have for this statement?
Understand something.
The structures and models that the stations are run result in a very bureaucratic process to do anything.
NP will own the pumps,tanks,fuel monitoring etc.
So if the pumps are breaking down-you wait on NP to repair.
NP supplies-you wait for them to supply.
Your price and margin are regulated
You cant change the product.
and you locked into a contract.
I know one owner that began preventative maintenance on the pumps-at his cost belts,filters hoses all changed out before failure-so down time was minimized.
He was sanctioned and instructed to stop.NP accused him of rigging the pumps(no proof).
the PDA has been lobbying for a rationalization of the industry for years-pre 2010.
THe industry needs to be restructured...with the Marketing companies getting out of the ownership of stations.
pete wrote:If the marketing companies get out of the ownership of the stations should they also make it that anyone who wants to, can open a gas station and not just the few "lucky" people who have been given the gift of having gas stations in the past?
bluesclues wrote:Redman wrote:willing to bet is just slackness have most of them sufferer gas station sufferin. Stop limin down the islands every day and go monitor and improve yuh fkin store.
What basis do you have for this statement?
Understand something.
The structures and models that the stations are run result in a very bureaucratic process to do anything.
NP will own the pumps,tanks,fuel monitoring etc.
So if the pumps are breaking down-you wait on NP to repair.
NP supplies-you wait for them to supply.
Your price and margin are regulated
You cant change the product.
and you locked into a contract.
I know one owner that began preventative maintenance on the pumps-at his cost belts,filters hoses all changed out before failure-so down time was minimized.
He was sanctioned and instructed to stop.NP accused him of rigging the pumps(no proof).
the PDA has been lobbying for a rationalization of the industry for years-pre 2010.
THe industry needs to be restructured...with the Marketing companies getting out of the ownership of stations.
I saw ur post on all the technicalities. But as usual u focussing on technicality while i focus on simplicity.
First of all the 'store' im talking about, is the quickshoppe.
Sure i hear u where there needs to be some restructuring of how much the station gets to keep with gas sales and i dunno, if its possible, couldnt a station owner sue np for loss of sales when a pump down for an extended period of time(days/weeks)? Arent they compensated in some way? If not then surely that is an area of legislation that could be improved upon to force greater efficiency not for only one party, but both.
So like i was saying all i was talking about before was related to the quickshoppe sales. As it is structured it only targets a 'certain' customer base. They can restructure their store, inventory and pricing much better to target a wider consumer base and based on the area and type of regular customers they have. That is just one. The service stations.. i dont know, i almost never see anyone getting serviced at a service station. Me neither. Cant they change oil, tyres and that sort of thing at the service station? I dont know, but if so, why doesnt anyone use their service? Is it because of cost? Efficiency? They should be able to perform an oil change in 20 minutes. Did mine yesterday and it took 30 minutes and most of the time was used just jacking up the car with a manual jack.
So to answer your question. The basis for my statements is what i see with my own eyes, and the reason i dont shop at the quickshoppe for ANYTHING even though im in one almost every day. Sometimes twice a day. They could put book in the outside window to force customers to enter the quickshoppe to pay for gas how much they want. But if the products consumers want arent there, or at a price they are willing to pay, they will, just like me, pay for gas, and leave. Which is what i see them doing. The highest quickshoppe sales probably come from cigarettes only.
.willing to bet is just slackness have most of them sufferer gas station sufferin. Stop limin down the islands every day and go monitor and improve yuh fkin store
Redman wrote:bluesclues wrote:Redman wrote:willing to bet is just slackness have most of them sufferer gas station sufferin. Stop limin down the islands every day and go monitor and improve yuh fkin store.
What basis do you have for this statement?
Understand something.
The structures and models that the stations are run result in a very bureaucratic process to do anything.
NP will own the pumps,tanks,fuel monitoring etc.
So if the pumps are breaking down-you wait on NP to repair.
NP supplies-you wait for them to supply.
Your price and margin are regulated
You cant change the product.
and you locked into a contract.
I know one owner that began preventative maintenance on the pumps-at his cost belts,filters hoses all changed out before failure-so down time was minimized.
He was sanctioned and instructed to stop.NP accused him of rigging the pumps(no proof).
the PDA has been lobbying for a rationalization of the industry for years-pre 2010.
THe industry needs to be restructured...with the Marketing companies getting out of the ownership of stations.
I saw ur post on all the technicalities. But as usual u focussing on technicality while i focus on simplicity.
First of all the 'store' im talking about, is the quickshoppe.
Sure i hear u where there needs to be some restructuring of how much the station gets to keep with gas sales and i dunno, if its possible, couldnt a station owner sue np for loss of sales when a pump down for an extended period of time(days/weeks)? Arent they compensated in some way? If not then surely that is an area of legislation that could be improved upon to force greater efficiency not for only one party, but both.
So like i was saying all i was talking about before was related to the quickshoppe sales. As it is structured it only targets a 'certain' customer base. They can restructure their store, inventory and pricing much better to target a wider consumer base and based on the area and type of regular customers they have. That is just one. The service stations.. i dont know, i almost never see anyone getting serviced at a service station. Me neither. Cant they change oil, tyres and that sort of thing at the service station? I dont know, but if so, why doesnt anyone use their service? Is it because of cost? Efficiency? They should be able to perform an oil change in 20 minutes. Did mine yesterday and it took 30 minutes and most of the time was used just jacking up the car with a manual jack.
So to answer your question. The basis for my statements is what i see with my own eyes, and the reason i dont shop at the quickshoppe for ANYTHING even though im in one almost every day. Sometimes twice a day. They could put book in the outside window to force customers to enter the quickshoppe to pay for gas how much they want. But if the products consumers want arent there, or at a price they are willing to pay, they will, just like me, pay for gas, and leave. Which is what i see them doing. The highest quickshoppe sales probably come from cigarettes only..willing to bet is just slackness have most of them sufferer gas station sufferin. Stop limin down the islands every day and go monitor and improve yuh fkin store
So there is no basis other that you thinking you have the solution....based on passing through the C stores and not buying anything.
But for your Info Quikshoppes are centrally controlled by NP
NP has a master product list that the operators must stay within.
The Point of Sale system is centrally controlled so that the operator has no pricing power.
You cant sell anything not on the system.
Here is the thing.
Before the budget fuel contributed half of the gross profit.
After the budget the fuel is barely break even. Green Fund CCard and Business Levy, take the margins away.
So for all the jaw boning here the budget would have kicked C Store site in the teeth, and killed the fuel only sites.
If I just signed a contract based on an expected return and that is now cut in half-should I stay quiet?
Redman wrote:It must easy to sit and poke holes in something when one is:
1) Ignorant of the underlying constraints that limit the choices and hamper execution.
2) Arrogant enough to believe that because something that you think should be done,hasnt been done, the operators are stupid,careless or down the islands everyday and that there is a reason x,y or z has not been done.
3)Unfettered by any real risk,responsibility or saddled by the facts.
Redman wrote:Takin all that space to prove what is already obvious...isn't very efficient.
Just saying.
Redman wrote:uh while you were focusing on reading and comprehending...
I made my suggestion-it didnt take me 5000 words to make it though so you might have missed it.
Redman wrote:Cliff notes?
I repeat....the industry needs to be restructured and the marketing co needs to get out of the retail side.
Redman wrote:It must easy to sit and poke holes in something when one is:
1) Ignorant of the underlying constraints that limit the choices and hamper execution.
2) Arrogant enough to believe that because something that you think should be done,hasnt been done, the operators are stupid,careless or down the islands everyday and that there is a reason x,y or z has not been done.
3)Unfettered by any real risk,responsibility or saddled by the facts.
crash dummy wrote:Redman wrote:It must easy to sit and poke holes in something when one is:
1) Ignorant of the underlying constraints that limit the choices and hamper execution.
2) Arrogant enough to believe that because something that you think should be done,hasnt been done, the operators are stupid,careless or down the islands everyday and that there is a reason x,y or z has not been done.
3)Unfettered by any real risk,responsibility or saddled by the facts.
U have real patience i'll give you that. I gave up on clues since the Benz talk. Typical to speak of what you dont know/arent sure of with authority. He must have been a pastor in his previous life.
The operators also used to get bulk discounts/ buy x get x free on purchases for the Quikshoppes. That used to help the situation a bit.
All that has been effectively taken away.
That being said this current system is designed to fail.
What are u saying? i can interpret that a couple different ways. Please explain in more detail for me im slow. What about the industry would u restructure. And when you say 'get out of the retail business'. Are u referring to np? Would that affect the maintenance contract for the pumps etc? Are you referring to them giving up the quickshoppe aspect only or also the retail gas and lubricants side?
What are u saying? i can interpret that a couple different ways. Please explain in more detail for me im slow.
What about the industry would u restructure. And when you say 'get out of the retail business'. Are u referring to np?
Would that affect the maintenance contract for the pumps etc?
Are you referring to them giving up the quickshoppe aspect only or also the retail gas and lubricants side?
Redman wrote:
NP is a marketing company-hence the 'M' in its name National Petroleum Marketing Co Ltd
They get a wholesale margin.(NOT COMMISSION) Since NPMCL wholesales the fuels to the Gas Stations
Gas Stations get a RETAIL margin since they retail fuel to the public
NP owns and operates some of the stations-they have 2 models that they run different sites.
OWNER DEALERS own the sites and have a supply agreement with NP.
As such Owners compete with their supplier.
Its more profitable to NP to ensure that their sites have fuel to sell.
For eg NP ensures that their QShoppe s are topped up BEFORE they send fuel to an owner dealer that is out of stock...
So for this to change NP needs to be held accountable in punitive $$$ for when this occurs..and i KNOW that it happens.
Would that affect the maintenance contract for the pumps etc?
Maybe.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 78 guests