Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
computercentral wrote:The l300 I have is 2505kg
*$kїđž![TRADE MARK SIGN] wrote:computercentral wrote:The l300 I have is 2505kg
U should post a pic up of that van cause this doesn't seem right at all
BRZ wrote:like all dem popo on lunch? plenty ah dem NAvara, Ranger and Hilux Spaceships start back flying over 65kms. LIke dem wanna lorse dem chrome rims for ah $6000 FINE ah wha!
wagonrunner wrote:this is not being enforced. every time i'm on the highway, there are vehicles which should be maxed at 65 doing 80 and over.
*KRONIK* wrote:Yet...somehow....the day i do 82km/h i go get ketch/ticketed...
adnj wrote:*$kїđž![TRADE MARK SIGN] wrote:computercentral wrote:The l300 I have is 2505kg
U should post a pic up of that van cause this doesn't seem right at all
I saw one today that was 2505 kg. I'm sure that the L300 has multiple engine and wheelbase specs.
hindian wrote:. . . What I dont understand is I drive an e25 panel van and the MGW is 3100kgs therefore it requires class 4 permit to drive it and a padna has the almost identical vehicle but the MGW is 2900kgs and it could be driven with class 3...
Rory Phoulorie wrote:hindian wrote:. . . What I dont understand is I drive an e25 panel van and the MGW is 3100kgs therefore it requires class 4 permit to drive it and a padna has the almost identical vehicle but the MGW is 2900kgs and it could be driven with class 3...
What do you mean by "almost identical"? Same model year? Same engine size? Were they both bought from the local dealer (Massy Motors) or are they foreign used? If they were foreign used, did they both originate from the same country? Perhaps the suspension set ups are slightly different in terms of load carrying capacity?
hindian wrote:adnj wrote:*$kїđž![TRADE MARK SIGN] wrote:computercentral wrote:The l300 I have is 2505kg
U should post a pic up of that van cause this doesn't seem right at all
I saw one today that was 2505 kg. I'm sure that the L300 has multiple engine and wheelbase specs.
As far as I can tell, all the l300s came 4d56 which has a 2.5 liter capacity and 5 speed manual gearbox. I have only ever seen one thay came with a factory installed gas engine and no power steering but the MGW and TARE weights were always the same 2505 and 1380. What I dont understand is I drive an e25 panel van and the MGW is 3100kgs therefore it requires class 4 permit to drive it and a padna has the almost identical vehicle but the MGW is 2900kgs and it could be driven with class 3...
hindian wrote:As far as I can tell, all the l300s came 4d56 which has a 2.5 liter capacity and 5 speed manual gearbox. I have only ever seen one thay came with a factory installed gas engine and no power steering but the MGW and TARE weights were always the same 2505 and 1380. What I dont understand is I drive an e25 panel van and the MGW is 3100kgs therefore it requires class 4 permit to drive it and a padna has the almost identical vehicle but the MGW is 2900kgs and it could be driven with class 3...
pugboy wrote:I don't think that is correct, at least the timing of the mgw change
I have heavy t license long before those newer Rangers, tcz ?
I remember the regs exam used 6500lbs as the class 4 distinction, i.e. 2954kg or 2950 as they seem to have rounded off
When I did the exam all class distinctions in lbs, not kg
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 83 guests