Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
BRZ wrote:im sure MANY of you are completely Unaware that when Hyatt was built by the government that a majority of local input was Excluded! Local suppliers were not favored and many companies who can manufacture the SAME products locally were denied any participation.
ALL govts love to Cheat their OWN people!
Lance wrote:desifemlove wrote:SO will the state run this or own it? i support it. Economic diversification, and St. Clair ent no scruff/gunta area, so high-end hotel fits. Only objection is that hotels don't need to be owned by the state. i does believe in small government.
So why not let the private sector do this.
You're saying that you support state led capitalism?
It's the government's role to induce diversification through policy and regulation, NOT to actively engage in profit driven enterprises.
desifemlove wrote:Lance wrote:desifemlove wrote:SO will the state run this or own it? i support it. Economic diversification, and St. Clair ent no scruff/gunta area, so high-end hotel fits. Only objection is that hotels don't need to be owned by the state. i does believe in small government.
So why not let the private sector do this.
You're saying that you support state led capitalism?
It's the government's role to induce diversification through policy and regulation, NOT to actively engage in profit driven enterprises.
name a country in which the state don't drive economic activity? whether this is tax breaks, incentives, or PPPs, or leases, most do it, even in the USA, UK, Canada.
desifemlove wrote:governments run economies, dude. Rowley nor Khan said what the exact nature is, but then we have FCB, ent this profit-making and state-owned? nothing wrong with the state identifying and driving econmic activity, this is its job, dude...
BRZ wrote:whereas in the previous administration, the heads in control were themselves the bosses of all the misapproiated funds. How complimentary.!!!
zoom rader wrote:It meant the greater citizenry shared in the benefits and produce entrepreneurs which tricked down to the agv citizen.
Under this government only a very few select ppl benefit.
Lance wrote:zoom rader wrote:It meant the greater citizenry shared in the benefits and produce entrepreneurs which tricked down to the agv citizen.
Under this government only a very few select ppl benefit.
Did you just try to peddle some 1980s Reaganomics bullshiet?
hhahahahaha
De Dragon wrote:Governments have all proven in the past that they can't own, operate or manage most projects effectively. Let private sector run hotels, which contrary to what most people believe is a hard thing to do properly. You can't talk cost cutting, deny people wages, yet talk about mega million dollar projects in which you have no track record or proficiency.
eliteauto wrote:De Dragon wrote:Governments have all proven in the past that they can't own, operate or manage most projects effectively. Let private sector run hotels, which contrary to what most people believe is a hard thing to do properly. You can't talk cost cutting, deny people wages, yet talk about mega million dollar projects in which you have no track record or proficiency.
How would you rate the profitability of the Hyatt and The Hilton?
De Dragon wrote:eliteauto wrote:De Dragon wrote:Governments have all proven in the past that they can't own, operate or manage most projects effectively. Let private sector run hotels, which contrary to what most people believe is a hard thing to do properly. You can't talk cost cutting, deny people wages, yet talk about mega million dollar projects in which you have no track record or proficiency.
How would you rate the profitability of the Hyatt and The Hilton?
Like I said, things that the Government owns/part owns are best left to private interests to operate. Those ventures were entered into when there was money due to high oil prices.
eliteauto wrote:De Dragon wrote:eliteauto wrote:De Dragon wrote:Governments have all proven in the past that they can't own, operate or manage most projects effectively. Let private sector run hotels, which contrary to what most people believe is a hard thing to do properly. You can't talk cost cutting, deny people wages, yet talk about mega million dollar projects in which you have no track record or proficiency.
How would you rate the profitability of the Hyatt and The Hilton?
Like I said, things that the Government owns/part owns are best left to private interests to operate. Those ventures were entered into when there was money due to high oil prices.
It's interesting how many people are weighing in on a project when they have so little information about it yet, (albeit I agree with having a cautious outlook due to previous Gov't corruption) btw when ppl talk about diversifying their economy there are times when capital intensive projects have to be undertaken in spite of negative economic outlook, so that when fortunes turn the infrastructure is in place, if this is part of a tourism thrust it can be a good thing as that market is trending upwards
eliteauto wrote:De Dragon wrote:eliteauto wrote:De Dragon wrote:Governments have all proven in the past that they can't own, operate or manage most projects effectively. Let private sector run hotels, which contrary to what most people believe is a hard thing to do properly. You can't talk cost cutting, deny people wages, yet talk about mega million dollar projects in which you have no track record or proficiency.
How would you rate the profitability of the Hyatt and The Hilton?
Like I said, things that the Government owns/part owns are best left to private interests to operate. Those ventures were entered into when there was money due to high oil prices.
It's interesting how many people are weighing in on a project when they have so little information about it yet, (albeit I agree with having a cautious outlook due to previous Gov't corruption) btw when ppl talk about diversifying their economy there are times when capital intensive projects have to be undertaken in spite of negative economic outlook, so that when fortunes turn the infrastructure is in place, if this is part of a tourism thrust it can be a good thing as that market is trending upwards
From what I understand, it not just T&T, Dominican Republic and Costa Rica, could be these simply not selling rooms.De Dragon wrote:eliteauto wrote:De Dragon wrote:eliteauto wrote:De Dragon wrote:Governments have all proven in the past that they can't own, operate or manage most projects effectively. Let private sector run hotels, which contrary to what most people believe is a hard thing to do properly. You can't talk cost cutting, deny people wages, yet talk about mega million dollar projects in which you have no track record or proficiency.
How would you rate the profitability of the Hyatt and The Hilton?
Like I said, things that the Government owns/part owns are best left to private interests to operate. Those ventures were entered into when there was money due to high oil prices.
It's interesting how many people are weighing in on a project when they have so little information about it yet, (albeit I agree with having a cautious outlook due to previous Gov't corruption) btw when ppl talk about diversifying their economy there are times when capital intensive projects have to be undertaken in spite of negative economic outlook, so that when fortunes turn the infrastructure is in place, if this is part of a tourism thrust it can be a good thing as that market is trending upwards
Hotels by their very nature are a high risk venture even when you have "hotel" people running them. Look at Carlton Savannah. Did you also notice that the Courtyard Marriott is up for sale as well?
desifemlove wrote:From what I understand, it not just T&T, Dominican Republic and Costa Rica, could be these simply not selling rooms.De Dragon wrote:eliteauto wrote:De Dragon wrote:eliteauto wrote:De Dragon wrote:Governments have all proven in the past that they can't own, operate or manage most projects effectively. Let private sector run hotels, which contrary to what most people believe is a hard thing to do properly. You can't talk cost cutting, deny people wages, yet talk about mega million dollar projects in which you have no track record or proficiency.
How would you rate the profitability of the Hyatt and The Hilton?
Like I said, things that the Government owns/part owns are best left to private interests to operate. Those ventures were entered into when there was money due to high oil prices.
It's interesting how many people are weighing in on a project when they have so little information about it yet, (albeit I agree with having a cautious outlook due to previous Gov't corruption) btw when ppl talk about diversifying their economy there are times when capital intensive projects have to be undertaken in spite of negative economic outlook, so that when fortunes turn the infrastructure is in place, if this is part of a tourism thrust it can be a good thing as that market is trending upwards
Hotels by their very nature are a high risk venture even when you have "hotel" people running them. Look at Carlton Savannah. Did you also notice that the Courtyard Marriott is up for sale as well?
DVSTT wrote:Given our crime situation do you really think tourism will experience a sudden increase within the foreseeable future, to justify the hotel?
De Dragon wrote:desifemlove wrote:From what I understand, it not just T&T, Dominican Republic and Costa Rica, could be these simply not selling rooms.De Dragon wrote:eliteauto wrote:De Dragon wrote:eliteauto wrote:De Dragon wrote:Governments have all proven in the past that they can't own, operate or manage most projects effectively. Let private sector run hotels, which contrary to what most people believe is a hard thing to do properly. You can't talk cost cutting, deny people wages, yet talk about mega million dollar projects in which you have no track record or proficiency.
How would you rate the profitability of the Hyatt and The Hilton?
Like I said, things that the Government owns/part owns are best left to private interests to operate. Those ventures were entered into when there was money due to high oil prices.
It's interesting how many people are weighing in on a project when they have so little information about it yet, (albeit I agree with having a cautious outlook due to previous Gov't corruption) btw when ppl talk about diversifying their economy there are times when capital intensive projects have to be undertaken in spite of negative economic outlook, so that when fortunes turn the infrastructure is in place, if this is part of a tourism thrust it can be a good thing as that market is trending upwards
Hotels by their very nature are a high risk venture even when you have "hotel" people running them. Look at Carlton Savannah. Did you also notice that the Courtyard Marriott is up for sale as well?
Yes, so do we expect that different people will spend lots more(if the hotel is to be a 5-star)?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 102 guests