WTF: Pregnant at 10 years

RBphoto · Postby **RBphoto** » September 10th, 2015, 9:08 pm

Baby girl should turn out to be a lesbian (I love gays).... that will show those self righteous biggots.

Habit7 · Postby **Habit7** » September 10th, 2015, 9:14 pm

RBphoto wrote:Baby girl should turn out to be a lesbian (I love gays).... that will show those self righteous biggots.

Oh no, not a lesbian :shock:

Ted_v2 · Postby **Ted_v2** » September 11th, 2015, 7:10 am

Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:
Ted_v2 wrote:A 10 year old girl cannot make a child. The body isn't developed and the girl and the child would die

In the article it says she had the child successfully.
What basis do you say both would die?

Simple biology dg. The body isn't developed properly. Bones ect. Cervix

Slartibartfast · Postby **Slartibartfast** » September 11th, 2015, 8:41 am

Habit7 wrote:@Slartibartfast
If you truly believe that murdering innocent children are wrong, people's opinion and consequence won't matter. Stage of development is not an issue, murdering a 3yo is no different than an 11yo.

Totally agree. Now I'm talking about before birth.

Habit7 wrote:Life begins at conception, a zygote is considered totipotent meaning it has all it needs to develop into a human being.

If life begins at conception and you are against taking of innocent life does that meant that you are against contraception (like condoms)? Or do you believe that life begins when the sperm enters the egg? in which case you would have no problems with condoms or morning after pills. Again, just trying to get an idea of your view.

Allergic2BunnyEars · Postby **Allergic2BunnyEars** » September 11th, 2015, 9:03 am

Ted_v2 wrote:
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:
Ted_v2 wrote:A 10 year old girl cannot make a child. The body isn't developed and the girl and the child would die

In the article it says she had the child successfully.
What basis do you say both would die?

Simple biology dg. The body isn't developed properly. Bones ect. Cervix

The article contradicts your predicted outcome though.

Habit7 · Postby **Habit7** » September 11th, 2015, 9:07 am

Slartibartfast wrote:
Habit7 wrote:Life begins at conception, a zygote is considered totipotent meaning it has all it needs to develop into a human being.
If life begins at conception and you are against taking of innocent life does that meant that you are against contraception (like condoms)? Or do you believe that life begins when the sperm enters the egg? in which case you would have no problems with condoms or morning after pills. Again, just trying to get an idea of your view.

I think if you fully grasp what conception is and what a zygote is, it will answer your subsequent questions.

Slartibartfast · Postby **Slartibartfast** » September 11th, 2015, 9:17 am

My bad, so when the egg is fertilized then? So all forms of birth control before are OK and anything afterwards is considered an abortion and is not OK according to you?

neexis · Postby **neexis** » September 11th, 2015, 2:04 pm

Slartibartfast wrote:My bad, so when the egg is fertilized then? So all forms of birth control before are OK and anything afterwards is considered an abortion and is not OK according to you?

Pls... zygotes have feelings too k