PAP letter for Rachel Price.

rollingstock · Postby **rollingstock** » November 11th, 2014, 4:48 pm

S_2NR wrote:
orangefox wrote:
shogun wrote:
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:Who is Carmona suit guy? Sleeves be too long and this happening in multiple suits. He too old for young people like me to be spotting that sheit. Supposed to know better. If you not going to be doing anything for the country at least look good doing it.

F'real...

He really has one too many ill-fitting suits for someone in his position.

He is a lawyer . A Judge. Contender in Hague. President. Wife is 20 year his Junior.

Who exactly are you ? Come again.

not sure which one you talking about but..

one is an over emotional phaggot who takes this website way too seriously

the other feel he reach & has a bad attitude because he drives a jetta

desifemlove · Postby **desifemlove** » November 11th, 2014, 5:20 pm

airuma wrote:
desifemlove wrote:
airuma wrote:7 pages and nobody seem to know exactly what Rachel Price say! I agree with the President, Rachel took her opportunity in the morning show and the President is saying that's enough, we heard you the first time. So what if the man have "thin skin"? Some people just don't take kindly to people making fun of them and they have every right to. The strange thing is the man is charged with the responsibility of defending the Country and Constitution and is being bashed by some for defending his wife!!!

erm....tell me in which country a politician can sue for CRITICISM and not slander? What was said about Reema wasn't slander.....

Ex-UK PM was called a one-eyed idiot by Jeremy Clarkson. Brown lost vision in an eye as a yout, and he didn't sue. Obama had/HAS racist tings said about he all de time, he doh sue.... People here call Kamla an alleged drunk and Anand an alleged bestiality practitioner, dey doh sue......

And since when is having a thin skin a virtue? Was what Rachel said slanderous? NO. Is freedom of expression legally permissible here? YES. Has this country turned into Nazi Germany or Stalinist Russia over night? NO. stop being a nookie, and accept people have the right to their opinions and it's a free country. doh like it, piss off to Saudi or Cuba...

Lets see if we can get this clear, according to wikipedia, "Defamation—also calumny, vilification, and traducement—is the communication of a false statement that harms the reputation of an individual person, business, product, group, government, religion, or nation. Most jurisdictions allow legal action to deter various kinds of defamation and retaliate against groundless criticism."
Now did any fashion expert or stylist give a professional opinion on this issue?
Freedom of expression IMHO is pushed to the limits by the disgusting nature of Rachel's "comedy"
Again, according to wikipedia "A virtue is a positive trait or quality deemed to be morally good and thus is valued as a foundation of principle and good moral being."
Everyone has the right to be comfortable with their existence, just because one may be a comedian does not mean everyone should like jokes and if I don't like you joking about me I should be free to express that and should be left alone. Strange that the man is freely expressing himself and we have a problem with it but not with Rachel.
According to "http://www.ttlawcourts.org/index.php/component/attachments/download/2728", "Pre-action protocols outline the steps parties should take to seek information from and to provide information to each other about a prospective legal claim"
The president is sending a strong message, loud and clear to everyone that he does not appreciate people speaking about him or his family in a derogatory manner. I think this is an attitude that IS becoming of a president.
And about your Nazi Germany comment, if you really have a problem with what Hitler did, then you should also have a problem with all of the financing a well know leader in the computing industry got from him for their subsequent research and development.
Oh, and just because it happens in the UK, it should happen here too right?? Some people will never be original and hence, never be leaders!!

Criticism and insults are not defamation....Pres and YOU being too sensitive, stop de nookie sheit nah...... As for UK, erm..you do realise we have the same legal tradition, ent? Accordingly, the same traditions and principles guide both Trinidad and UK laws..... I'm sure definitions of defamation similar too, and this wouldn't stand at all in a UK court....

And comedy? it subjective, bro. Comedians whilst being observational have dey own styles, some in yuh face like the late Bill Hicks/Richard Pryor and Chris Rock, others more tame like Steve Martin or Martin Lawrence. I doh like Price, but then she has a right to her own style, simply don't go to Naps Bowl/Lord Kitchener/Centre of Excellence to see she....simple..

I jus doh tink what she said counts as defamation....humiliating, maybe, but then public criticism is not defaming somebody legally. What Anand said about ILP Anna WAS defamation Reema has looks, but not de brains in equal measure..