Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
brams112 wrote:Most narco subs travel close to the surface because the drug lords are yet to get guys to build a submarine to make the full journey up to now.Recently a fully built submarine was discovered in a jungle almost ready for its maiden trip.
mars wrote:brams112 wrote:Most narco subs travel close to the surface because the drug lords are yet to get guys to build a submarine to make the full journey up to now.Recently a fully built submarine was discovered in a jungle almost ready for its maiden trip.
Find this hard to believe - if anyone has the $$$ to build or buy proper sub its the drug guys! In the '90s the Colombian cartels were making more money that the defense budgets of the US and Russia COMBINED!
Habit7 wrote:it probably didnt, who knows...eliteauto wrote:actually radar had nothing to do with that bust, what is the status of the radar system now?
The only reason we got here is UML's attempt to deflect from the PM's error in policy in stating that the war is on land and not on sea. If Mervin Cordner is right, drug subs operating here with impunity for a while now.
eliteauto wrote:UML wrote:Habit7 wrote:"The country is not at war out in the seas; the country is at war on the ground..."
MP SC Kamla Persad-BissessarGriffith: OPVs useless against drug subs
National Security Minister Gary Griffith said T&T had the capability to track and intercept drug submarines in its territorial waters. However, he said, he could not divulge the technology available to local security forces. Griffith added that offshore patrol vessels (OPVs) would not have been able to deal with incursions by drug submarines.
“It emphasises my point about the illogical comments made by a few that if we had three defective OPVs it would stop the flow of illegal drugs and weapons. One hundred OPVs would be useless. The critical operational policies required are not defective 90-metre vessels in deep waters but exactly what we have done, reigniting the security co-operation agreement with Venezuela and Colombia,” he said.
“There is now better sharing [of] information being turned to intelligence upon which heavier deterrents are implemented and national security resources can be streamlined in the appropriate position.”
my question is, has this co-operation netted any tangible results? What about the promised/proposed boats from
a) Colombia-
http://www.newsday.co.tt/politics/0,169339.html
http://www.trinidadexpress.com/news/Gov ... 31441.html
http://www.trinidadexpress.com/news/Col ... 03701.html
b) China-
http://www.trinidadexpress.com/news/Chi ... 51311.html
given that boats are known to transport narcotics and the firearms that come with it what is our status re: naval border protection?
mars wrote:brams112 wrote:Most narco subs travel close to the surface because the drug lords are yet to get guys to build a submarine to make the full journey up to now.Recently a fully built submarine was discovered in a jungle almost ready for its maiden trip.
Find this hard to believe - if anyone has the $$$ to build or buy proper sub its the drug guys! In the '90s the Colombian cartels were making more money that the defense budgets of the US and Russia COMBINED!
kjaglal76v2 wrote:. . .also the cartel drug subs were designed by russian naval engineers
eliteauto wrote:AYE!!!!! look a good man reach dey, a knowledgeable fellow with knowledge about the inner workings of the political parties
Zoom help out a non-degreed fella nah.... shine some light on the downtrodden (ah now look up that word eh so I eh know if it correct)eliteauto wrote:UML wrote:Habit7 wrote:"The country is not at war out in the seas; the country is at war on the ground..."
MP SC Kamla Persad-BissessarGriffith: OPVs useless against drug subs
National Security Minister Gary Griffith said T&T had the capability to track and intercept drug submarines in its territorial waters. However, he said, he could not divulge the technology available to local security forces. Griffith added that offshore patrol vessels (OPVs) would not have been able to deal with incursions by drug submarines.
“It emphasises my point about the illogical comments made by a few that if we had three defective OPVs it would stop the flow of illegal drugs and weapons. One hundred OPVs would be useless. The critical operational policies required are not defective 90-metre vessels in deep waters but exactly what we have done, reigniting the security co-operation agreement with Venezuela and Colombia,” he said.
“There is now better sharing [of] information being turned to intelligence upon which heavier deterrents are implemented and national security resources can be streamlined in the appropriate position.”
my question is, has this co-operation netted any tangible results? What about the promised/proposed boats from
a) Colombia-
http://www.newsday.co.tt/politics/0,169339.html
http://www.trinidadexpress.com/news/Gov ... 31441.html
http://www.trinidadexpress.com/news/Col ... 03701.html
b) China-
http://www.trinidadexpress.com/news/Chi ... 51311.html
given that boats are known to transport narcotics and the firearms that come with it what is our status re: naval border protection?
brams112 wrote:pete wrote:Why does the helicopter need to land and refuel on a vessel? Why not make an arrangement with /build a heliport in galeota to do refuelling? How far offshore do you think they should go?
I am sure he can't answer that one,the coast guards need to do their jobs properly that is all,anyways we don't have a huge maritime border to warrant a ship capable of servicing or transporting a chopper ent?Most narco subs travel close to the surface because the drug lords are yet to get guys to build a submarine to make the full journey up to now.Recently a fully built submarine was discovered in a jungle almost ready for its maiden trip.
Rory Phoulorie wrote:kjaglal76v2 wrote:. . .also the cartel drug subs were designed by russian naval engineers
If that were so, then they would be equipped with caterpillar drive propulsion systems.
Habit7 wrote:brams112 wrote:pete wrote:Why does the helicopter need to land and refuel on a vessel? Why not make an arrangement with /build a heliport in galeota to do refuelling? How far offshore do you think they should go?
I am sure he can't answer that one,the coast guards need to do their jobs properly that is all,anyways we don't have a huge maritime border to warrant a ship capable of servicing or transporting a chopper ent?Most narco subs travel close to the surface because the drug lords are yet to get guys to build a submarine to make the full journey up to now.Recently a fully built submarine was discovered in a jungle almost ready for its maiden trip.
Helicopters have a limited range and speed when compare to a fixed wing aircraft. The benefit comes with hovering and maneuverability. While our western borders are near, our eastern borders extend up to 150nm. Therefore with a Sikorsky S-76's range of 411nm, in order to perform a sortie at the fullest extend of our boundaries, 75% of the fuel is getting there and back from land based fuel station. A mobile fueling platform tremendously improves operation time and reduces mobilization. Furthermore we can't just patrol our house alone we need to secure the neighbourhood otherwise the drugs will just be transshipped.
While most narco subs are really semisubmersibles, it is easier to spot it from the air and use helicopters to rappel in and stop them from scuttling it http://www.reuters.com/article/2008/07/ ... 8420080718
I remember on an radio interview, Subhas Panday now removed from Cabinet secrecy revealed that Brig. Sandy demanded at least one OPV, but Mr. Griffith convinced the PM not to. Now Griffith goes around saying the S-76 bought for the OPVs not good and they can't operate in blackouts. Nevertheless, after 4 of the nations biggest budgets ever, we are yet to improve out fleet.
Redman wrote:If we are a TRANSSHIPMENT POINT then the drugs that do come in are for mainly export the US /Euro
We have 1 airport,and a couple ports that handle that type of outgoing cargo.
We dont have to patrol the high seas looking for the subs,go fasts etc-we know where they coming.
If we were to lock down the export points...screening ALL containerized cargo and flights leaving
-it wouldnt make sense to bring coke/guns in...
Pretty soon the coke bypassing us..cuz it cant get out.
I dont really care if the coke passing around, away from or over TnT on its way to the end user.
We dont have to spend money to interdict coke that ent landing on our shores.
If the coke cant leave ...they wouldnt send it here in the first place.
So search the bottle neck that the 5000 sq KM island is.
Since the technology to indeed screen ALL cargo entering and leaving through the legitimate see and air ports has been locally available since about 2010/11 the reason that we still fighting this problem is not one of capability...but one of political will.....
Like it make a difference which party in power-THAT business remains un affected.
I cudnt read all dat nonsense nah.
Coke passes through leaves guns.
U guarding the border who guarding icacos cedros Mayaro down the islands Carli bay felicity caroni etc? U don't have to be a port to bring in and export drugs costatt grad!!!
So search the bottle neck that the 5000 sq KM island is.
UML wrote:You talking out ur ass....u ever watch an open ocean from the air and see something in the water? Steups shut up and let ppl tink yuh chupid and not know yuh chupid nah.
“It will accommodate an additional seven berths which will enable T&T to participate in logistics activity in the wider Caribbean region,” the minister said. He added that it has already become a “dedicated berth for the T&T Coast Guard” and will benefit energy companies.
http://www.guardian.co.tt/news/2014-09- ... nal-growth
Jahflame wrote:There is one constant element that will always conquer any and every system that was or will be implemented. The human element. As long as there are individuals in our protective services that can be bought, we will never see an end to the drug trade.
pioneer wrote:We could have 10 OPV's with all kinda helipad, when CG get orders from above to stand down during an interception, what they supposed to do?
Habit7 wrote:"The country is not at war out in the seas; the country is at war on the ground..."
MP SC Kamla Persad-Bissessar
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 77 guests