Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Habit7 wrote:It seems like the general public, the DPP, Dana Sitahal, Martin Daly, Ramesh Lawrence Maharaj, and quite possibly every special interest group is calling for an international, independent investigation. Why isn't the gov't listening?
It is not just that we believe the police is incompetent, we just do not want a reason for the outcome to be claimed by either party to be tainted with political influence.
De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:It seems like the general public, the DPP, Dana Sitahal, Martin Daly, Ramesh Lawrence Maharaj, and quite possibly every special interest group is calling for an international, independent investigation. Why isn't the gov't listening?
It is not just that we believe the police is incompetent, we just do not want a reason for the outcome to be claimed by either party to be tainted with political influence.
Rowley can't make irresponsible statements like he doesn't 'trust' the Asst. COP. Then goes on to give an entirely one sided version of a conversation he allegedly had with Richardson about the PM assassination plot, in which he makes the Asst. COP not only look incompetent, but bumbling as well. A lot of people who should know better are casually besmirching people's name without a shred of evidence. I have lost much of the respect I had for Dana Seetahal, and now Martin Daly, who are now blatantly saying that the COP cannot be impartial because he was appointed by the Government.
BrandoHD wrote:De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:It seems like the general public, the DPP, Dana Sitahal, Martin Daly, Ramesh Lawrence Maharaj, and quite possibly every special interest group is calling for an international, independent investigation. Why isn't the gov't listening?
It is not just that we believe the police is incompetent, we just do not want a reason for the outcome to be claimed by either party to be tainted with political influence.
Rowley can't make irresponsible statements like he doesn't 'trust' the Asst. COP. Then goes on to give an entirely one sided version of a conversation he allegedly had with Richardson about the PM assassination plot, in which he makes the Asst. COP not only look incompetent, but bumbling as well. A lot of people who should know better are casually besmirching people's name without a shred of evidence. I have lost much of the respect I had for Dana Seetahal, and now Martin Daly, who are now blatantly saying that the COP cannot be impartial because he was appointed by the Government.
Who says they don't have a shred of evidence, a lot of people are privy to information that they can't/won't speak about in the open, more so politicians. People can behave and speak according to what they know, consciously or unconsciously, without letting everyone else know why they are behaving the way they are, he may have very good information to make what you call an irresponsible statement, that is, until you have the info he has
RedTiger wrote:" The DPP said after a meeting with Richardson ... the Police Service may be singularly and particularly hamstrung in their attempts, though gallant, to conduct a full and through investigation.”
http://www.guardian.co.tt/news/2013-05- ... o-it-alone
rollingstock wrote:^ Exactly. The TTPS has a competent team assigned to the Cyber crime unit, made up of qualified police and civilian employees.
But I wouldn't be surprised if external help is sought just to appease politicians.
Slippery slope that, if they are deemed unqualified to investigate the veracity of simple e-mails, how can they then continue to operate and investigate crimes committed against citizens?
De Dragon wrote:rollingstock wrote:^ Exactly. The TTPS has a competent team assigned to the Cyber crime unit, made up of qualified police and civilian employees.
But I wouldn't be surprised if external help is sought just to appease politicians.
Slippery slope that, if they are deemed unqualified to investigate the veracity of simple e-mails, how can they then continue to operate and investigate crimes committed against citizens?
But careless politicians, lawyers, etc will continue to denigrate hard working honest policemen and women to score cheap political and brownie points
eliteauto wrote:De Dragon wrote:rollingstock wrote:^ Exactly. The TTPS has a competent team assigned to the Cyber crime unit, made up of qualified police and civilian employees.
But I wouldn't be surprised if external help is sought just to appease politicians.
Slippery slope that, if they are deemed unqualified to investigate the veracity of simple e-mails, how can they then continue to operate and investigate crimes committed against citizens?
But careless politicians, lawyers, etc will continue to denigrate hard working honest policemen and women to score cheap political and brownie points
small thing because average ignorant civilians with superiority complexes do the same everyday incl right here on the forum
De Dragon wrote:rollingstock wrote:^ Exactly. The TTPS has a competent team assigned to the Cyber crime unit, made up of qualified police and civilian employees.
But I wouldn't be surprised if external help is sought just to appease politicians.
Slippery slope that, if they are deemed unqualified to investigate the veracity of simple e-mails, how can they then continue to operate and investigate crimes committed against citizens?
But careless politicians, lawyers, etc will continue to denigrate hard working honest policemen and women to score cheap political and brownie points
nemisis wrote:The problem isn't that the police not capable just that they can be influenced by the powers that be
what he distracting us from?r3iXmann wrote:Can't believe such a big deal is being made over this nonsense
Guess Rowleys distraction worked after all
pioneer wrote:that he is ah tuntun
De Dragon wrote:BrandoHD wrote:De Dragon wrote:Habit7 wrote:It seems like the general public, the DPP, Dana Sitahal, Martin Daly, Ramesh Lawrence Maharaj, and quite possibly every special interest group is calling for an international, independent investigation. Why isn't the gov't listening?
It is not just that we believe the police is incompetent, we just do not want a reason for the outcome to be claimed by either party to be tainted with political influence.
Rowley can't make irresponsible statements like he doesn't 'trust' the Asst. COP. Then goes on to give an entirely one sided version of a conversation he allegedly had with Richardson about the PM assassination plot, in which he makes the Asst. COP not only look incompetent, but bumbling as well. A lot of people who should know better are casually besmirching people's name without a shred of evidence. I have lost much of the respect I had for Dana Seetahal, and now Martin Daly, who are now blatantly saying that the COP cannot be impartial because he was appointed by the Government.
Who says they don't have a shred of evidence, a lot of people are privy to information that they can't/won't speak about in the open, more so politicians. People can behave and speak according to what they know, consciously or unconsciously, without letting everyone else know why they are behaving the way they are, he may have very good information to make what you call an irresponsible statement, that is, until you have the info he has
You're kidding right? Politicians have slandered more people under the guise of parliamentary privilege than you can count. Copy and paste email whose veracity cannot be ascertained is not evidence. Saying that you don't trust the Police to investigate is also irresponsible as they are the body entrusted with that responsibility whether Rowley likes that or not. The Police can bring in an independent body of their choosing if they lack the wherewithal to investigate this matter.
pioneer wrote:
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests