Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Trini Hookah wrote:No Sony men in here orr
trini mk5 wrote:FF frame's main advantage is its low light capability. While a crop sensor can shoot at around 3200 ASA max for fairly clean images, a GOOD FF sensor should be able to shoot at 6400 and above for really clean images. If you doing concert photography or anything that involves low light photography a FF is always better....providing you are not shooting with flash or you cant light the scene.
However your wide lenses will be wide but your telephoto lenses will be shorter than if it was on a crop sensor body. Example 200mm of a FF is 200mm, but on a crop nikon body it will be 300mm which is great for longer distances. multiply by 1.5 times
Image quality will be really up to the lens you use and remember you will have to buy new FF lenses to work effectively on this cam.
If you have the money by all means buy it, or you could exploit the canon 5d2 at a cheaper price, which as far as i see is still a better camera than this. cheers
lighthammer wrote:Good job kid, smart way to use ur phones scene settings.
*brofist*
lighthammer wrote:Hold dat dey....
Taken with Nikon D200, 18-70mm f/3.5-4.0 AF-S DX lens, at a beach in toco the morning after watching some turtles in Matura earlier this year.
Edited in Lightroom.
Terran wrote:I was toying around with close-up shots of some roses today.
Lens: Canon 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6
f/4.5 & 5.6 (last shot)
ISO 200
1/125s
wireless flash (Speedlite 580EX ii)
No post-processing.
trini mk5, I didn't think of your suggestion about spraying water. Maybe tomorrow.
Red Roses by Terran E, on Flickr
Red Roses by Terran E, on Flickr
Red Roses by Terran E, on Flickr
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Dizzy28 and 161 guests