Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
BANzai Rastafarai wrote:honda hoe wrote:Rensh wrote:Quite a bit of water you guys were in:
wtf? that is real sh!t
2 cars lost control and got damaged because racing was allowed to continue even though there was substantial water on the course surface. u cannot control a car if it is hydroplaning.
if this exact thing had happened in camden everybody would be quick to jump up and cyak dat TTASA don't care about safety of spectators or racers and only interested in depositing money in car trunk blah blah
Good points Brent...and im sure if Rawle Mahabir reads this he would be the first to admit the error in letting them run.... issa learning process....just as how im sure ASPL NOW realize they need tyre barriers along the edges of the course..more marshalls in the pit areaa....that kinda thing.....there was one run where Pornie ran Ronnie and the evo 9 was all over the track....under a less experienced driver with that amount of power the car may have ended up in the spectators area..... just as how no matter how many times you warned drivers, they still drove hard in the pits...like Pornie's last run where he ran with no helmet...X2's run where his competitor hit TWO cones and it was ignored....like The Professor;'s run against Jodi where it was clear he misses a clipping point to make up time.....it aint perfect...things slip through the cracks....so points well taken.
Only thing i would banter on you on is what i think is a comparison of TTASA's operations to ASPL's.... because the "money in the trunk" issue aside, for every error you chugg up on ASPL's side, there are 3 like errors on TTASA's side.
and to clarify...in Jodi's run the track was not drenched with water as in Shiv's incident...so you cant class the second incident to "driving conditions"...there was a Civic that ran through the barriers at that same point on a dry track as well.....
just clarifying the situation....[/fanboyism]
paparazzi wrote:wagonrunner wrote:it's making the fb rounds.
kudos to Sean's response as he was told the GTR
Hallmark of a true sportsman. Make no bones about it, he is a fierce competitor but when the sheit hit the ....umm lamppost he had my back.
X2 wrote:DJaggs... what kinda chain up vids yuh showing there ?
I mean Chris knows how to do his thing eh... but that honda not pressing down the straight and basically stopped in the last 360 (does not show in the vid). And the first vid vs the red swift... well I drove that run and did not use 2nd gear at all so I could get some datalog info... 1st, 3rd... brakes...
sorry to buss d bubbles...
Porn Star wrote:SUPAstarr wrote:Look CHAIN UP AHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHHH, will we see a rematch on the 11th porn?
![]()
If god spare life.
I just trying to build up some excitement for the 11th.![]()
rcadiz wrote:I love the comments. A couple things for everyone to consider before getting their panties in a twist. This is not to defend or chastise the organizers but seriously folks there's some comments on this post which are so biased because of the TTASA vs ASA crap.
First off to Shiv - i hope you are OK and consider this a lesson in racing and an experience to learn from. Things happen and hopefully next time around this experience will make you a better driver when faced with a similar situation. That said very sorry to hear, coming from a man who has hit, rolled, hit and hit again from a go-kart to a rally car, i can honestly say i know how you feel.
To all the sh^t talkers.
There is a major responsibility of the organizers to provide a certain level of safety but before you say 'how they could make them race in those conditions?' consider the following:
- The track is designed with a 90 degree turn at the end of it that you probably have to take in 2nd gear, which means you can't carry excess speed into it. The driver needs to take it as he feels comfortable and that discretion is left up to him. You can't say the event was NOT safe because a car crashed. If that were so then every motorsport including F1 should be banned then....
- Changing conditions to WET - If the organizers forced the racers to race despite protests and threatened disqualification then i could understand, but as far as i am aware they both had the option to say we will wait for dry or we going in the rain. When it starts to rain while a race is in progress and the track becomes wet in karting, circuit, F1, and even Rally, you slow down, you don't go faster or maintain a 'dry' speed (before switching to wet or intermediates). That said there is a point where the organizers have to say that we need to cancel for now, but there will always be a time for the driver to make the best decision given the conditions as he is the one behind the wheel.
- Lets face it, and no disrespect to any driver out there but money, parts, and fast cars does not make you a race car driver. There will come a time when a car is just too modified to race in those types of events. A 1000hp car probably shouldn't attempt that event because there are times when the cars pitch and get loose and then aim in the direction of the timing tent, or the PITS. Its still a safe distance but ASA will at some point have to refuse a car and driver based on the drivers ability to handle a car that probably should be reserved for a full track. Also the part of the course which has the fastest speed is no where near any spectators and in this case the driver is a danger only to himself and possibly his competitor.
- SAFETY - As i mentioned before safety is to be put in place first and foremost to avoid damages to persons, property, competitors, and loss of life. But its really easy to say what you would have done when its already happened. Its a sad part of motorsport and life that you only put things in place after stuff has happened. Crashing your car however is pretty par for the course in any form of motorsport - its an accepted risk when you enter any event. This scenario involves a truly beautiful car so its more dramatic, would it have been the same consideration given to a fully prepped race car shell of a car that looks as though it was designed to handle a crash? Next SAFETY also brings into play what you have in place to deal with an accident, Ambulance, Fire Extinguishers, Marshals on spot etc etc etc. it varies depending on the type of event obviously.
At the end of it folks, the true safety of the event was to protect life and limb and there was no damage to any as far as i know. Cars can be repaired, and better things can be put in place next time. I attended the event and i like i am sure many other patrons had some suggestions for ASA, all of which i am sure will be taken into consideration tohopefully make the event better and safer next time.
So moral of this stop using incidents like this to fuel stupid arguments about who is better ASA or TTASA.
- Was Drag and Wine a safe event - for the most part yes?
- Is this accident going to reflect bad on the organizers - it shouldn't, but i am sure they will take the entire event into consideration when faced with similar conditions next time.
- Who is the better organization - Who cares?
At the end of the day let the competitors and spectators judge for themselves on the overall experience and let the free economy roll, and last time i checked people were free to decide where they want to go anyways.
best to luck on the future endeavors of this event
Rensh wrote:look some more pics deh:
MG Man wrote:Unlike you, who make yuh chile eat camphor balls so yuh could say she sick jus to avoid cutarse
kes_vtec wrote:now paparazzi, as you know, you and shawn sharelicks singh, are my buddies, but this event i had to back, mr shawn sharelicks singh, being the underdog and stuff, but for next the event, i want you to "wash" his ass out, to let these little boys know, when a man is knock down, he just gets on his feet, twice as strong...
Team Loco wrote:true true. my father said he had a hard time being categorised but its all in good fun. he had a good time. imagine he calling me to say i missing out. i think he made it to the quarter finals but then lost
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 30 guests