Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Dizzy28 wrote:'Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:No...your bolded red section, point three stands on its own. Intent was always there. Competency sadly wasn't. Today they are paying for that incompetency.Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:^ no reply to my response?
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=761813&p=10463425#p10463363
Anyway, seems US talks with Iran aren't going the way the US wants:
Non-essential US embassy staff and their dependants in Baghdad are evacuating from Iraq due to heightened security risks, US government sources said on Wednesday.
Officials did not say exactly what prompted the removal, however, in recent days talks over Iran's nuclear programme appear to have stalled.
A US state department official told the BBC: "We are constantly assessing the appropriate personnel posture at all our embassies.
"Based on our latest analysis, we decided to reduce the footprint of our mission in Iraq."
US President Donald Trump told a podcast on Wednesday that he was growing less confident that a deal could be reached over Iran's nuclear programme.
The US wants Iran to stop enriching uranium, which can be used to create a nuclear bomb, in exchange for easing economic sanctions.
Iranian Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said his country would retaliate against US bases in the region if talks fail and Trump orders military strikes against Iran.
Reuters reports that US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth also approved the voluntary departure of families of US military personnel from countries across the Middle East, including Kuwait and Bahrain.
Testifying in front of a congressional panel on Wednesday, Hegseth said he believed there are "plenty of indications" that Iran is "moving their way towards something that would look a lot like a nuclear weapon".
Iran says its uranium enrichment programme is for civilian energy generation and that it is not trying to build an atomic bomb.
Also on Wednesday, the UK's Maritime Trade Operations organisation - part of the Royal Navy - issued a warning saying that increased military tensions in the Middle East could affect shipping.
The price of oil initially increased more than 4% when news of the US evacuation broke, in anticipation of regional insecurity potentially leading to supply problems.
Around 2,500 US troops are based in Iraq, according to the defence department.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c629yk5z07vo
Intent is a criteria for genocide too, though now it is way past just intent.
You're telling me the most powerful military in the Middle East with standoff weapons requiring them to not put boots on the ground has intent to commit genocide but the best they can do with that intent is 57,000 dead after 600+ days of urban combat. That number also includes combatants since the Hamas run Min of Health makes no differentiation when publishing figures. And with a genocide happening the side that is being genocided has no intent to ever surrender even though they are being genocided???
Cool!!!!
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:'Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:No...your bolded red section, point three stands on its own. Intent was always there. Competency sadly wasn't. Today they are paying for that incompetency.Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:^ no reply to my response?
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=761813&p=10463425#p10463363
Anyway, seems US talks with Iran aren't going the way the US wants:
Non-essential US embassy staff and their dependants in Baghdad are evacuating from Iraq due to heightened security risks, US government sources said on Wednesday.
Officials did not say exactly what prompted the removal, however, in recent days talks over Iran's nuclear programme appear to have stalled.
A US state department official told the BBC: "We are constantly assessing the appropriate personnel posture at all our embassies.
"Based on our latest analysis, we decided to reduce the footprint of our mission in Iraq."
US President Donald Trump told a podcast on Wednesday that he was growing less confident that a deal could be reached over Iran's nuclear programme.
The US wants Iran to stop enriching uranium, which can be used to create a nuclear bomb, in exchange for easing economic sanctions.
Iranian Defence Minister Aziz Nasirzadeh said his country would retaliate against US bases in the region if talks fail and Trump orders military strikes against Iran.
Reuters reports that US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth also approved the voluntary departure of families of US military personnel from countries across the Middle East, including Kuwait and Bahrain.
Testifying in front of a congressional panel on Wednesday, Hegseth said he believed there are "plenty of indications" that Iran is "moving their way towards something that would look a lot like a nuclear weapon".
Iran says its uranium enrichment programme is for civilian energy generation and that it is not trying to build an atomic bomb.
Also on Wednesday, the UK's Maritime Trade Operations organisation - part of the Royal Navy - issued a warning saying that increased military tensions in the Middle East could affect shipping.
The price of oil initially increased more than 4% when news of the US evacuation broke, in anticipation of regional insecurity potentially leading to supply problems.
Around 2,500 US troops are based in Iraq, according to the defence department.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c629yk5z07vo
Intent is a criteria for genocide too, though now it is way past just intent.
You're telling me the most powerful military in the Middle East with standoff weapons requiring them to not put boots on the ground has intent to commit genocide but the best they can do with that intent is 57,000 dead after 600+ days of urban combat. That number also includes combatants since the Hamas run Min of Health makes no differentiation when publishing figures. And with a genocide happening the side that is being genocided has no intent to ever surrender even though they are being genocided???
Cool!!!!
Most powerful (with the help of the US)
Seems you are crediting Israel with having self-restraint from just obliterating Gaza and the West Bank and calling that proof of no genocide. Oct 7th was a good excuse to lift that "restraint". Israel is wary of international condemnation as is apparent when Netanyahu said they are allowing aid back in for no other reason than international pressure.
Palestinians have no intent of leaving, even if it means death - that much you have correct.
"Even if it costs us our souls, we will not leave Gaza,"
The scenes of Palestinians on the move have echoed black-and-white footage from 1948 and the mass evacuations that took place during fighting before and after the creation of the state of Israel.
More than 700,000 people were then forced from their homes. The majority of Gazans are descendants of those original refugees.
"If there is only one drop of blood left in our children, we won't go out of Gaza. We won't give up on it!"
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c78xre2ynd4o
The United Nations resolution sparked conflict between Jewish and Arab groups within Palestine. Fighting began with attacks by irregular bands of Palestinian Arabs attached to local units of the Arab Liberation Army composed of volunteers from Palestine and neighboring Arab countries. These groups launched their attacks against Jewish cities, settlements, and armed forces. The Jewish forces were composed of the Haganah, the underground militia of the Jewish community in Palestine, and two small irregular groups, the Irgun, and LEHI. The goal of the Arabs was initially to block the Partition Resolution and to prevent the establishment of the Jewish state. The Jews, on the other hand, hoped to gain control over the territory allotted to them under the Partition Plan.
After Israel declared its independence on May 14, 1948, the fighting intensified with other Arab forces joining the Palestinian Arabs in attacking territory in the former Palestinian mandate. On the eve of May 14, the Arabs launched an air attack on Tel Aviv, which the Israelis resisted. This action was followed by the invasion of the former Palestinian mandate by Arab armies from Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Egypt.
Dizzy28 wrote:They don't have to leave. Just surrender.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:They don't have to leave. Just surrender.
Surrender to what? To an apartheid system and being treated as second-class human animals and being blockaded as they have been for decades?
I agree October 7th is very relevant - I've said before that October 7th was retaliation
Alpha army, beta army - Is Ukraine the alpha or a beta army in the Ukraine/Russia conflict?
Dizzy28 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:They don't have to leave. Just surrender.
Surrender to what? To an apartheid system and being treated as second-class human animals and being blockaded as they have been for decades?
I agree October 7th is very relevant - I've said before that October 7th was retaliation
Alpha army, beta army - Is Ukraine the alpha or a beta army in the Ukraine/Russia conflict?
Peer to the aggressor
sMASH wrote:The dots are connecting around the world FB_IMG_1748547808123.jpg
sMASH wrote:The goodly US and the terrorists ... In their own land FB_IMG_1749341756628.jpg
Dizzy28 wrote:It begins !
Operation Am K'Lavi!Screenshot_20250612-211237.jpg
Israel has nuclear weapons before I was born. You want me to be angry at things far before my time?Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:^ Does Israel have nuclear weapons?
Cherry picking which global entity findings to adhere to
Dizzy28 wrote:It would also start an entire arms race.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 25 guests