Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
X1000pugboy wrote:he is correct in that cops are surely stretched now having to respond to serious incidents everyday
it’s no longer basic stick up a grocery scenes but everyday is home invasions plus the regular murders
ttps seems to be largely a reaction service
govt need to issues soe in the areas them pests from
Phone Surgeon wrote:Lol yea while their official public position is one thing.
They does encourage yuh to fack up intruders .
They does openly talk about you can't shoot a man in his back who running away.
But men does be running away and have their hand behind them firing shots.....
And even if they running away...who's to say you don't have a family member or friend in the direction they running....
paid_influencer wrote:UNC_NTA.jpg
kamla on the platform tonight going hard with the stand your ground. She say under UNC you could "light them up," "empty the whole clip."
Remington , Smith and wesson16 cycles wrote:Who subduing 5 or 6 bad actors coming in for a home invasion?
sMASH wrote:In the past police have said that u csnt use excessive force , only enough to subdue , and any more , u can be guilty of an offense .
Specific stand your ground legislation is necessary to make it abundantly clear that once a miscreant decide to cross the border , they are in no man's land, and there is no such thing as excessive force.
More or less the same as police use of force policy , but extended to civilians with no second look.
Every prospective miscreant will hadda think long and hard thst once he set out on that mission , he is entering into the valley of the shadow of death.
Plenty pnm fowl running around and they causing havoc. share some corn to settle dem down. And we could live in peaceMaxPower wrote:Smash yuh rel wa da pipe boi
Yes, but i want it overtly stated , in clear language , with no room for misinterpreting.88sins wrote:sMASH wrote:In the past police have said that u csnt use excessive force , only enough to subdue , and any more , u can be guilty of an offense .
Specific stand your ground legislation is necessary to make it abundantly clear that once a miscreant decide to cross the border , they are in no man's land, and there is no such thing as excessive force.
More or less the same as police use of force policy , but extended to civilians with no second look.
Every prospective miscreant will hadda think long and hard thst once he set out on that mission , he is entering into the valley of the shadow of death.
Police could say anything, doesn't mean they're correct.
For example
You have firearm & FUL, and bandit comes into your house armed with a gun, and has the potential to kill you.
What you supposed to do, wait for him to try to kill you before you kill him?
Or wait for him to try to kill you, but you are limited to shooting him in the foot?
Or just give him your weapon and hope he don't try to kill you and if he does just pretend you are Neo from the matrix and the stop bullets with your mind and kung fu him into submission?
The thing we must accept, is that the only way to quickly and effectively stop a force, is to use significantly greater force against it, and anything less will not yield the desired result.
sMASH wrote:Plenty pnm fowl running around and they causing havoc. share some corn to settle dem down. And we could live in peaceMaxPower wrote:Smash yuh rel wa da pipe boi
alfa wrote:sMASH wrote:Racket must start back sooner or later. I hope you get through
sMASH wrote:Yes, but i want it overtly stated , in clear language , with no room for misinterpreting.
As long as u invade , u invite any force upon u.
If i remember correctly the owner get charged and imprisoned for that outcome88sins wrote:sMASH wrote:Yes, but i want it overtly stated , in clear language , with no room for misinterpreting.
As long as u invade , u invite any force upon u.
That precedent has already been set my boy.
Remember the thieving little girl in south who lost a hand and nearly her head?
What they charge the homeowner with again? And if she lost her head, the outcome would have in all probability been the same.
sMASH wrote:If i remember correctly the owner get charged and imprisoned for that outcome88sins wrote:sMASH wrote:Yes, but i want it overtly stated , in clear language , with no room for misinterpreting.
As long as u invade , u invite any force upon u.
That precedent has already been set my boy.
Remember the thieving little girl in south who lost a hand and nearly her head?
What they charge the homeowner with again? And if she lost her head, the outcome would have in all probability been the same.
sMASH wrote:If i remember correctly the owner get charged and imprisoned for that outcome88sins wrote:sMASH wrote:Yes, but i want it overtly stated , in clear language , with no room for misinterpreting.
As long as u invade , u invite any force upon u.
That precedent has already been set my boy.
Remember the thieving little girl in south who lost a hand and nearly her head?
What they charge the homeowner with again? And if she lost her head, the outcome would have in all probability been the same.
alfa wrote:sMASH wrote:Plenty pnm fowl running around and they causing havoc. share some corn to settle dem down. And we could live in peaceMaxPower wrote:Smash yuh rel wa da pipe boi
Racket must start back sooner or later. I hope you get through
alfa wrote:https://www.guardian.co.tt/news/ag-standyourground-legislation-coming-to-parliament-after-midyear-budget-review-6.2.2317588.a22738e144
Stand yuh ground may be coming in later this year
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests