Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
If he can't get money to the azov banderites , they might deal with him... He might press out before they can take action.paid_influencer wrote:
hover11 wrote:Lots of egos coming into play here and Trump holds the cards here .The USA should stop supplying weapons to Ukraine. Cut all support.
Sent from my SM-N986U1 using TriniTuner mobile app
The_Honourable wrote:
I would not be surprised Trump and Zelensky planned this laying the groundwork for Zelensky to have an out. When a deal happens resulting in an end to the war; Trump looks good for ending it, Putin can tell the Russian people that he "won", and Zelensky can always tell Ukrainians that he was forced into this position by the US.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:
Screenshot 2025-03-01 at 12.00.40 PM.jpg
The_Honourable wrote:Interesting...
Richard Hanania on X:
"I watched the entire press conference with Zelensky. There was 40 minutes of discussion up to the argument. Most people saw at most the last ten minutes. The whole video gives the proper context.
When I first watched the argument without the proper context, I thought it was possible that Trump and Vance ambushed Zelensky or were even trying to humiliate him. That's not what happened.
You had 40 minutes of calm conversation. Vance made a point that didn't attack Zelensky and wasn't even addressed to him, and Zelensky clearly started the argument.
In the first 40 minutes, Zelensky kept trying to go beyond what was negotiated in the deal. When Trump was asked a question, it was always "we'll see." Zelensky made blanket assertions that there would be no negotiating with Putin, and that Russia would pay for the war. When Trump said that it was a tragedy that people on both sides were dying, Zelensky interjected that the Russians were the invaders.
For his part, Trump made clear that the US would continue delivering military aid. All Zelensky had to do was remain calm for a few more minutes and they would've signed a deal.
The argument started when Trump pointed out that it would be hard to make a deal if you talk about Putin the way Zelensky does. Vance interjects to make the reasonable point that Biden called Putin names and that didn't get us anywhere.
The Zelensky/Trump dynamic was calm and stable. It was when Vance spoke that Zelensky started to interrogate him. Throughout the press conference to that point, everyone was making their arguments directly to the audience. Zelensky decided to challenge Vance and ask him hostile questions. He went back to his point that Putin never sticks to ceasefires, once again implying that negotiations are pointless. Why on earth would you do this? Then came the fight we all saw.
Zelensky was minutes away from being home free, and he would have had the deal and new commitments from the Trump administration. The point Vance made was directed against Biden and the media, taking them to task for speaking in moralistic terms. This offended Zelensky, and that began the argument.
I've been a fan of Zelensky up to this point, but this showed so much incompetence, if not emotional instability, that I don't see how he recovers from this. The relationship with the administration is broken. Ukraine should probably go with new leadership at this point."
https://x.com/RichardHanania/status/1895562922593841557
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:The_Honourable wrote:Interesting...
Richard Hanania on X:
"I watched the entire press conference with Zelensky. There was 40 minutes of discussion up to the argument. Most people saw at most the last ten minutes. The whole video gives the proper context.
When I first watched the argument without the proper context, I thought it was possible that Trump and Vance ambushed Zelensky or were even trying to humiliate him. That's not what happened.
You had 40 minutes of calm conversation. Vance made a point that didn't attack Zelensky and wasn't even addressed to him, and Zelensky clearly started the argument.
In the first 40 minutes, Zelensky kept trying to go beyond what was negotiated in the deal. When Trump was asked a question, it was always "we'll see." Zelensky made blanket assertions that there would be no negotiating with Putin, and that Russia would pay for the war. When Trump said that it was a tragedy that people on both sides were dying, Zelensky interjected that the Russians were the invaders.
For his part, Trump made clear that the US would continue delivering military aid. All Zelensky had to do was remain calm for a few more minutes and they would've signed a deal.
The argument started when Trump pointed out that it would be hard to make a deal if you talk about Putin the way Zelensky does. Vance interjects to make the reasonable point that Biden called Putin names and that didn't get us anywhere.
The Zelensky/Trump dynamic was calm and stable. It was when Vance spoke that Zelensky started to interrogate him. Throughout the press conference to that point, everyone was making their arguments directly to the audience. Zelensky decided to challenge Vance and ask him hostile questions. He went back to his point that Putin never sticks to ceasefires, once again implying that negotiations are pointless. Why on earth would you do this? Then came the fight we all saw.
Zelensky was minutes away from being home free, and he would have had the deal and new commitments from the Trump administration. The point Vance made was directed against Biden and the media, taking them to task for speaking in moralistic terms. This offended Zelensky, and that began the argument.
I've been a fan of Zelensky up to this point, but this showed so much incompetence, if not emotional instability, that I don't see how he recovers from this. The relationship with the administration is broken. Ukraine should probably go with new leadership at this point."
https://x.com/RichardHanania/status/1895562922593841557
Richard Hanania is a far-right commentator and MAGA supporter - that response is expected
The_Honourable wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:The_Honourable wrote:Interesting...
Richard Hanania on X:
"I watched the entire press conference with Zelensky. There was 40 minutes of discussion up to the argument. Most people saw at most the last ten minutes. The whole video gives the proper context.
When I first watched the argument without the proper context, I thought it was possible that Trump and Vance ambushed Zelensky or were even trying to humiliate him. That's not what happened.
You had 40 minutes of calm conversation. Vance made a point that didn't attack Zelensky and wasn't even addressed to him, and Zelensky clearly started the argument.
In the first 40 minutes, Zelensky kept trying to go beyond what was negotiated in the deal. When Trump was asked a question, it was always "we'll see." Zelensky made blanket assertions that there would be no negotiating with Putin, and that Russia would pay for the war. When Trump said that it was a tragedy that people on both sides were dying, Zelensky interjected that the Russians were the invaders.
For his part, Trump made clear that the US would continue delivering military aid. All Zelensky had to do was remain calm for a few more minutes and they would've signed a deal.
The argument started when Trump pointed out that it would be hard to make a deal if you talk about Putin the way Zelensky does. Vance interjects to make the reasonable point that Biden called Putin names and that didn't get us anywhere.
The Zelensky/Trump dynamic was calm and stable. It was when Vance spoke that Zelensky started to interrogate him. Throughout the press conference to that point, everyone was making their arguments directly to the audience. Zelensky decided to challenge Vance and ask him hostile questions. He went back to his point that Putin never sticks to ceasefires, once again implying that negotiations are pointless. Why on earth would you do this? Then came the fight we all saw.
Zelensky was minutes away from being home free, and he would have had the deal and new commitments from the Trump administration. The point Vance made was directed against Biden and the media, taking them to task for speaking in moralistic terms. This offended Zelensky, and that began the argument.
I've been a fan of Zelensky up to this point, but this showed so much incompetence, if not emotional instability, that I don't see how he recovers from this. The relationship with the administration is broken. Ukraine should probably go with new leadership at this point."
https://x.com/RichardHanania/status/1895562922593841557
Richard Hanania is a far-right commentator and MAGA supporter - that response is expected
Was he wrong in his analysis?
Dizzy28 wrote:If I was China I would attempt to retake Taiwan by June.
Clearly Taiwan would stand alone based on the rules of the world now.
paid_influencer wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:If I was China I would attempt to retake Taiwan by June.
Clearly Taiwan would stand alone based on the rules of the world now.
what do you mean now have the rules changed what were they before now
Relax chet....if a bunch of sand jockeys living in a strip of land 50kms long thinks fighting the Country with the best air force in the Middle East was a good idea then opposing Russia in a country with a strategic depth of hundreds of kms isn't a bad idea.sMASH wrote:The Ukraine forces in kursk are being cut down systematically . There will be no territory held by Ukraine to swap by mid year.
Gone with that land, also the best Ukraine fighters.
European countries have expressed solidarity with Ukraine after the white house dress down . A plan will be to buy American arms to keep Ukraine fighting.
Russia needs absolutely neutral Ukraine , ND are on track to establish thst reality .
How much Ukraine remains sovereign depends on how soon they yield .
Who ever thought fighting Russia was a good idea are idiots.
It was never a good idea, it's the only option they have.Dizzy28 wrote:Relax chet....if a bunch of sand jockeys living in a strip of land 50kms long thinks fighting the Country with the best air force in the Middle East was a good idea then opposing Russia in a country with a strategic depth of hundreds of kms isn't a bad idea.sMASH wrote:The Ukraine forces in kursk are being cut down systematically . There will be no territory held by Ukraine to swap by mid year.
Gone with that land, also the best Ukraine fighters.
European countries have expressed solidarity with Ukraine after the white house dress down . A plan will be to buy American arms to keep Ukraine fighting.
Russia needs absolutely neutral Ukraine , ND are on track to establish thst reality .
How much Ukraine remains sovereign depends on how soon they yield .
Who ever thought fighting Russia was a good idea are idiots.
Dizzy28 wrote:Promises used to matter.
Quoting Golda Meir in a quote against Palestinian terrorism.sMASH wrote:It was never a good idea, it's the only option they have.Dizzy28 wrote:Relax chet....if a bunch of sand jockeys living in a strip of land 50kms long thinks fighting the Country with the best air force in the Middle East was a good idea then opposing Russia in a country with a strategic depth of hundreds of kms isn't a bad idea.sMASH wrote:The Ukraine forces in kursk are being cut down systematically . There will be no territory held by Ukraine to swap by mid year.
Gone with that land, also the best Ukraine fighters.
European countries have expressed solidarity with Ukraine after the white house dress down . A plan will be to buy American arms to keep Ukraine fighting.
Russia needs absolutely neutral Ukraine , ND are on track to establish thst reality .
How much Ukraine remains sovereign depends on how soon they yield .
Who ever thought fighting Russia was a good idea are idiots.
Russia only needs a non aligned Ukraine .
Palestinians are facing eradication by religious nutcases from European colonizers .
They have different contexts
And the original quote speaker was also rightpaid_influencer wrote:sMASH is right tho
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:$500B in minerals for $119B of aid is the claim from the other side
Dizzy28 wrote:And the original quote speaker was also rightpaid_influencer wrote:sMASH is right tho
Probably notpaid_influencer wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:And the original quote speaker was also rightpaid_influencer wrote:sMASH is right tho
I don't think you understand it tho
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests