Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Everytime u re-enter this country is a setta form you hadda complete, we not ready . Check us back 2050MaxPower wrote:hover11 wrote:This is the same country where you have to fill out forms for nearly everything , yall really think we going cashless soon. Yall have high hopes yes
Third world people selling theirselves dreams.
Let them continue sending their emails and documents via whatsapp numbers, uploading pictures etc…..
But still end up submitting paper forms and passport size photos.
paid_influencer wrote:yup. the ppl clinging to cash will always be clinging to cash. they will never be ready.
we going to hold back the country for them?
keep crime escalating for them?
let black market and money laundering fester for them?
rowley need to grow some balls and go cashless NOW
The_Honourable wrote:What i'm trying to tell you for the longest while is that the systems to implement such at the moment are insufficient.
Once the systems are modernized and in place, legislation must also be in place to protect the consumer. Imagine you go cashless, bank freeze your account because of a misunderstanding yet the same bank still taking months if not a year to investigate your account and come to a decision? What will you do in the meantime? make noise on tuner about the banks and capitalism?
paid_influencer wrote:we need to get crime under control
We had foreign assistance and PNM ran them out.MaxPower wrote:paid_influencer wrote:we need to get crime under control
Correct.
We need foreign assistance.
We can start with the presence of a foreign army. Criminals can’t whatsapp them.
paid_influencer wrote:The_Honourable wrote:What i'm trying to tell you for the longest while is that the systems to implement such at the moment are insufficient.
They are sufficient. Many people on the island are already cashless. People on the island going to wake up today and live a 100% cash free existence just as they have done for years already now.
Cash is a drain on the system. Imagine if bank workers never had to deal with deposits or withdrawals. Those workers would be free to deal with other more important tasks like setting up customer accounts. Same with ATMs.
This past Saturday I pass through Gulf City. You know they have an ANSA bank in gulf city? I walk in and the workers, dressed in suit and tie, looked at me, and I looked back at this, because the place empty. Bank workers setting there 100% ready to make you cashless, today. The systems are there, just not being used.Once the systems are modernized and in place, legislation must also be in place to protect the consumer. Imagine you go cashless, bank freeze your account because of a misunderstanding yet the same bank still taking months if not a year to investigate your account and come to a decision? What will you do in the meantime? make noise on tuner about the banks and capitalism?
Many, many people on the island are already cashless and this has never been an issue.
timelapse wrote:Some points to ponder:
Sweden and Norway are backpedalling on plans for cashless societies over fears that fully digital payment systems would leave them vulnerable to Russian security threats, and concern for those unable to use them.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/oct/30/sweden-and-norway-rethink-cashless-society-plans-over-russia-security-fears Full Article here on security concerns
Then there are these points to also consider: https://www.aclu.org/news/privacy-technology/say-no-cashless-future-and-cashless-stores
Bad for privacy. When you pay cash, there is no middleman; you pay, you receive goods or services — end of story. When a middleman becomes part of the transaction, that middleman often gets to learn about the transaction — and under our weak privacy laws, has a lot of leeway to use that information as it sees fit. (Cash transactions of more than $10,000 must be reported to the government, however.) More on privacy and payment systems in a follow-up post.
Bad for low-income communities. Participation in a cashless society presumes a level of financial stability and enmeshment in bureaucratic financial systems that many people simply do not possess. Opening a bank account requires an ID, which many poor and elderly people lack, as well as other documents such as a utility bill or other proof of address, which the homeless lack, and which generally create bureaucratic barriers to participating in electronic payment networks. Banks also charge fees that can be significant for people living on the economic margins. According to government data from 2017, about one in 15 U.S. households (6.5%) were “unbanked” (had no checking or savings account), while almost one in five (18.7%) were “underbanked” (had a bank account but resorted to using money orders, check cashing, or payday loans). Finally, because merchants usually pass along the cost of credit card fees to all their customers through their prices, the current credit card system effectively serves to transfer money from poor households to high-income households, according to a study by the Federal Reserve.
Bad for people of color. The burden of lack of access to banking services such as credit cards does not fall equally. While 84% of white people in 2017 were what the Federal Reserve calls “fully banked,” only 52% of Black and 63% of Hispanic people were.
Bad for the undocumented. Facing a lack of official identity documents, not to mention all the other obstacles mentioned above, undocumented immigrants can have an even harder time accessing banking services.
Bad for many merchants. Merchants pay roughly 2-3% of every transaction to the credit card companies, which can be a significant “tax,” especially on low-margin businesses. With the credit card sector dominated by an oligopoly of 2-3 companies, there is not enough competition to keep these “swipe fees” low. Big companies have the leverage to negotiate lower fees, but small merchants are out of luck, and the amount that they pay to the credit card companies is often greater than their profit. If cashless stores are allowed to become widespread, that will harm the many merchants who either discourage or flat-out refuse to accept credit cards due to these fees.
Less resilient. The nationwide outage of electronic cash registers at Target stores several weeks ago left customers unable to make purchases — except those who had cash. That’s a reminder that electronic payments systems can mean centralized points of failure — not just technical failures like Target’s, but also security failures. A cashless society would also leave people more susceptible to economic failure on an individual basis: if a hacker, bureaucratic error, or natural disaster shuts a consumer out of their account, the lack of a cash option would leave them few alternatives.
You full of it as usualj.o.e wrote:We need to make cashless more widespread not necessarily make mandatory. I personally would embrace cashless.
The only thing I really pay for cash is the barber.
Or the odd time I eat a gyro or doubles (hardly ever)
paid_influencer wrote:the lesson is that the supermarket that does millions in sales a week
should have a backup internet connection and redundant systems in place
that was a failure by the supermarket, regardless or cash or cashless
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests