Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
alfa wrote:16 cycles wrote:VexXx Dogg wrote:Seeing UNC promising standyourground laws through FB ads.
I wanted to ask about the axethetax promise, but I eh feel like arguing with anyone who dumb enough to believe any politician's promise.
Just vote the lesser of the evils and decide the level of screwed you going to be. It's inevitable and inescapable. You screwed no matter who in power.
fair point - not sure which mechanism they will use to usurp the CoP's authority over FuLs for home possession only - that might require a constitutional majority
no- we not Battousai that can carve up a whole army in one run with a sword - those days over
PNM was proposing change couple weeks ago where there will be a firearm board that makes binding recommendations on the COP. If the board is a mixture of both sides of the political divide and people with sense it could work and change the current ful culture
Chimera wrote:alfa wrote:16 cycles wrote:VexXx Dogg wrote:Seeing UNC promising standyourground laws through FB ads.
I wanted to ask about the axethetax promise, but I eh feel like arguing with anyone who dumb enough to believe any politician's promise.
Just vote the lesser of the evils and decide the level of screwed you going to be. It's inevitable and inescapable. You screwed no matter who in power.
fair point - not sure which mechanism they will use to usurp the CoP's authority over FuLs for home possession only - that might require a constitutional majority
no- we not Battousai that can carve up a whole army in one run with a sword - those days over
PNM was proposing change couple weeks ago where there will be a firearm board that makes binding recommendations on the COP. If the board is a mixture of both sides of the political divide and people with sense it could work and change the current ful culture
a binding recommendation you say?
a recommendation could be binding?
alfa wrote:16 cycles wrote:VexXx Dogg wrote:Seeing UNC promising standyourground laws through FB ads.
I wanted to ask about the axethetax promise, but I eh feel like arguing with anyone who dumb enough to believe any politician's promise.
Just vote the lesser of the evils and decide the level of screwed you going to be. It's inevitable and inescapable. You screwed no matter who in power.
fair point - not sure which mechanism they will use to usurp the CoP's authority over FuLs for home possession only - that might require a constitutional majority
no- we not Battousai that can carve up a whole army in one run with a sword - those days over
PNM was proposing change couple weeks ago where there will be a firearm board that makes binding recommendations on the COP. If the board is a mixture of both sides of the political divide and people with sense it could work and change the current ful culture
16 cycles wrote:VexXx Dogg wrote:Seeing UNC promising standyourground laws through FB ads.
I wanted to ask about the axethetax promise, but I eh feel like arguing with anyone who dumb enough to believe any politician's promise.
Just vote the lesser of the evils and decide the level of screwed you going to be. It's inevitable and inescapable. You screwed no matter who in power.
fair point - not sure which mechanism they will use to usurp the CoP's authority over FuLs for home possession only - that might require a constitutional majority
no- we not Battousai that can carve up a whole army in one run with a sword - those days over
And Rowlee, he has the final sayalfa wrote:Habit had said there are already fixed criteria to follow and that there is no discretion except in the discretion that the COP uses lol
redmanjp wrote:just change one word in the firearms act and that takes discretion away from the COP- 'may' to 'shall' as in 'the COP shall issue a FUL provided all criteria for obtaining a FUL is met' - also allow DCPs to sign off on FULs for their respective division to make the process more efficient. 'discretion' just gives rise to corruption and bribery.
We cant have PNM carnival ppl owning guns .MaxPower wrote:redmanjp wrote:just change one word in the firearms act and that takes discretion away from the COP- 'may' to 'shall' as in 'the COP shall issue a FUL provided all criteria for obtaining a FUL is met' - also allow DCPs to sign off on FULs for their respective division to make the process more efficient. 'discretion' just gives rise to corruption and bribery.
red,
We have to bear in mind that we don’t want too many Trinis with FULs. The irresponsible culture will make it bad for others.
The process has to be efficient yes, but extremely strict with proper screening and frequent monitoring for applicants. You cannot have village drunks, wife beaters and mentally unstable applicants etc with “clean” undocumented records being able to easily access legal firearms.
zoom rader wrote:We cant have PNM carnival ppl owning guns .
Caura ppl dont do home invasions.MaxPower wrote:zoom rader wrote:We cant have PNM carnival ppl owning guns .
Kamla is promoting guns for all.
She did not refer to a particular race, so yes, carnival and caura ppl will own guns as well.
16 cycles wrote:Shouldn't matter what planet you come from, once you are a law abiding Trini....process should be fair....though they said Burke had no convictions (iirc)...so there still ought to have some checks in the system....
16 cycles wrote:Shouldn't matter what planet you come from, once you are a law abiding Trini....process should be fair....though they said Burke had no convictions (iirc)...so there still ought to have some checks in the system....
alfa wrote:16 cycles wrote:Shouldn't matter what planet you come from, once you are a law abiding Trini....process should be fair....though they said Burke had no convictions (iirc)...so there still ought to have some checks in the system....
The fact is that there is all that and more presently. Medical screening for fitness, vision, psychological testing, letter from spouse. They look at the physical and security measures put in place at your residence, fencing, cameras, perimeter lighting, where will you install your safe etc. Then a background investigation as to why you need the firearm, evidence of burglary, police receipts, hunting and sport shooting recommendations where necessary.
From there a recommendation is made and that's where your file stops for years after. If you are lucky enough to be given a provisional there's a secondary investigation again after all that. We have more procedures than most other places but the end of the road stopper is the COP.
16 cycles wrote:Shouldn't matter what planet you come from, once you are a law abiding Trini....process should be fair....though they said Burke had no convictions (iirc)...so there still ought to have some checks in the system....
MaxPower wrote:zoom rader wrote:We cant have PNM carnival ppl owning guns .
Kamla is promoting guns for all.
She did not refer to a particular race, so yes, carnival and caura ppl will own guns as well.
3 some and shot in leg.sMASH wrote:Curtailed the event
That would be less from now. I not too clear , but from what I came across , the pm's war on legal guns is restricting parts and rounds , so although they didn't ban them, they are rendering them useless as time goes on.redmanjp wrote:i think we should have a thread to count how many crimes were prevented by FUL holders annually- the bandit shot thread would apply mostly to TTPS shootings and only a few FUL holders. this data could be useful in extrapolating how many crimes could be prevented by say a 5 fold increase in FUL holders - keeping in mind that if that happens it wont just be those that are directly prevented but also indirectly because then criminals would think twice before even attempting the crime.
redmanjp wrote:i think we should have a thread to count how many crimes were prevented by FUL holders annually- the bandit shot thread would apply mostly to TTPS shootings and only a few FUL holders. this data could be useful in extrapolating how many crimes could be prevented by say a 5 fold increase in FUL holders - keeping in mind that if that happens it wont just be those that are directly prevented but also indirectly because then criminals would think twice before even attempting the crime.
redmanjp wrote:the fact that ttps not releasing that data is even more reason for us to document it
redmanjp wrote:the fact that ttps not releasing that data is even more reason for us to document it
sMASH wrote:The mons and cop DO cite the data to show how legal guns are involved in crime and Accidents. But they include the arms of the protective services, but don't outwardly say it's both together... Those skew the narrative to justify their war against legal arms.
So stats need to be further subdivided into citizen FUL and protective service ful. And there u can also see how incompetent/criminal the protective services are compared to the citizen