Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Those advertisements were positioned so that the reader could easily reach a conclusion that they were looking for.ruffneck_12 wrote:If doctors say it, it must be true!
They have no agenda! They are doing this entirely as a charity, they work off of pure donations, not profit!
ALL HAIL THE ALL MIGHTY SCIENCE.
EVER CONSTANT AND EVER FACTUAL
(except when the science has changed)
adnj wrote:
People saw what they wanted to see. It seems to still be happening today - even with those same old ads.
Horse paste!ruffneck_12 wrote:adnj wrote:
People saw what they wanted to see. It seems to still be happening today - even with those same old ads.
eheheheh
Sound familiar?
sMASH wrote:Big pharma again.adnj wrote:Time for me to throw some more troll fuel onto the forum.
Coming up next: an article that says that every quality study completed on ivermectin indicates that it has no effect on COVID outcomes.
SARS-CoV-2 transmission with and without mask wearing or air cleaners in schools in Switzerland: A modeling study of epidemiological, environmental, and molecular data
Published: May 18, 2023
Conclusions
Molecular detection of airborne and human SARS-CoV-2 indicated sustained transmission in schools. Mask mandates were associated with greater reductions in aerosol concentrations than air cleaners and with lower transmission. Our multiple-measurement approach could be used to continuously monitor transmission risk of respiratory infections and the effectiveness of infection control measures in schools and other congregate settings.
What did the researchers do and find?
We used molecular, environmental, and epidemiological data to understand the transmission of the virus causing COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) in 2 secondary schools (90 students) in Switzerland in the presence and absence of mask wearing and air cleaners.
We detected SARS-CoV-2 in aerosols in the air and saliva samples from the students throughout the study.
Aerosol and particle concentrations were on average 70% lower with mask mandates and 40% lower with air cleaners.
The transmission model estimated that between 2 and 19 infections could be avoided during the study period with mask wearing.
What do these findings mean?
Molecular analyses indicated sustained airborne SARS-CoV-2 transmission.
Mask wearing may be more effective than air cleaners in reducing aerosol concentrations and transmission of SARS-CoV-2.
This approach can be used to assess transmission dynamics and the effectiveness of infection control measures in reducing transmission of respiratory infections during future epidemics.
https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/ ... ed.1004226
Ivermectin dog cheap, mrna 20 a dose. Obviously yhe Ivermectin doesn't work.
Look at Africa lowest covee rates on the world
That would explain a lot, since all of your posts sound like someone whose brain is dealing with a lack of oxygen.sMASH wrote:I went to do a triple bypass the other day.
Because thst wouldn't let me work without taking that procedure. They couldn't fire me fir not taking it, but they wouldn't let me work.
The bypass wasn't because i had heart disease, but they wanted to protect the other workers there from heart disease... Even though i didn't have heart disease.
Take the jab to stop the spread...loladnj wrote:COVID also causes heart disease. He should have been vaccinated and worn a well-fitting mask.
Free thinkers don't need to be constrained with so called research and science. They don't even need to have anything like a scientific understanding or social skills. That's why aned360123 wrote:That would explain a lot, since all of your posts sound like someone whose brain is dealing with a lack of oxygen.sMASH wrote:I went to do a triple bypass the other day.
Because thst wouldn't let me work without taking that procedure. They couldn't fire me fir not taking it, but they wouldn't let me work.
The bypass wasn't because i had heart disease, but they wanted to protect the other workers there from heart disease... Even though i didn't have heart disease.
alfa wrote:COVID was so 2021 but people still beating up lol
The_Honourable wrote:alfa wrote:COVID was so 2021 but people still beating up lol
Ent? it's entertaining tho.
sMASH wrote:Excess deaths are still high. And not being investigated
20% difference isnt high?adnj wrote:sMASH wrote:Excess deaths are still high. And not being investigated
No, they are not.
[img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20230520/37f4a951d8e96c3c857cb775e53cd9d6.jpg[/img]
sMASH wrote:20% difference isnt high?adnj wrote:sMASH wrote:Excess deaths are still high. And not being investigated
No, they are not.
Okayyyyyy
Prior to the emergence of the Omicron variant of COVID‑19, four significant periods of excess mortality were observed nationally since the start of the pandemic. From March 2020 to June 2020, followed by a longer period of excess deaths from September 2020 to February 2021. There was a shorter period experienced in May 2021, and another coinciding with the emergence of the Delta variant, from July 2021 to December 2021. While in general, these four periods have coincided with higher numbers of deaths due directly to COVID‑19, excess mortality could be affected because of various other factors, including delayed medical procedures, increased harms related to substance use, or changes in the prevalence of other diseases and medical conditions. For example, in the early summer of 2021, Alberta and British Colombia experienced a heat dome which coincided with more than 3,500 deaths in the two provinces over a two-week period ending July 10.
Since the emergence of the Omicron variant in late November 2021, there have been two periods of significant excess mortality observed so far. Nationally, there were significantly more deaths than expected from the beginning of January 2022 to the end of February 2022. During this period of excess mortality, the highest number of deaths and the highest weekly rate of excess mortality of the pandemic were recorded in the third week of January 2022: over one in five deaths during this week would not have been expected had there been no pandemic. In the spring, excess deaths were observed from the middle of April 2022 to the middle of June 2022. While the first period of excess mortality in 2022 was driven by excess mortality in Quebec and Ontario, the most recent period of excess mortality was driven by excess mortality in the three westernmost provinces. In fact, Alberta and British Colombia had higher than expected weekly deaths through much of 2022.
https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/71- ... 28-eng.htm
sMASH wrote:Supposed to be lower than that in 2023. But it's still high.
U have even less comorbid, people, more vaxef snd boosted population, and natural immunity.
Its not suppsed to be high... Supposed to be even lower
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests