Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
If I remembered correctly, you were stating so, because I said that LGBTQ+ persons should be treated like everyone else or because I am a feminist or something of that nature.ProtonPowder wrote:To be fair sir, I was calling you a predator from the get go.
Jared Mohammed wrote:If I remembered correctly, you were stating so, because I said that LGBTQ+ persons should be treated like everyone else or because I am a feminist or something of that nature.ProtonPowder wrote:To be fair sir, I was calling you a predator from the get go.
As I said before, you don't have to like me, just try to treat everyone whom might not align with your ideological view of the world with compassion and understanding on the basis of race, ethnicity, sex, gender, class, creed, immigrancy, neurodiversity, disability and orientation. Nobody is superior to another.
In the bible, it states to love thy neighbour.
Jared Mohammed wrote:That was a huge shift from the accusations normally made within the forum for this thread; from stating that I use AI to that.
Y'all know you could just plainly insult me rather than making up all those stuff.
aaron17 wrote:Would it be a matter of time when they take out 'men' from wo'men' and call them something else?
No, besides the fact that I don't have the money to purchase such a thing. I have shortened the messages so that it could be easily read. Since someone here pointed out my posts was too long and that they wanted it to be more concise.The_Honourable wrote:Jared Mohammed wrote:That was a huge shift from the accusations normally made within the forum for this thread; from stating that I use AI to that.
Y'all know you could just plainly insult me rather than making up all those stuff.
Stop Jared, you were using AI to help you with your posts and you got caught.
Now as you are posting more as yourself without AI assistance, we are seeing the contrast in your current and previous posts which confirms what we knew from the beginning.
You're pretty much exposed, don't fight it.
No. But persons should be more considerate to genderqueer and non-binary persons as well as those who exist wherever within the gender spectrum.aaron17 wrote:Would it be a matter of time when they take out 'men' from wo'men' and call them something else?
Gender refers to the characteristics of women, men, girls and boys that are socially constructed. This includes norms, behaviours and roles associated with being a woman, man, girl or boy, as well as relationships with each other. As a social construct, gender varies from society to society and can change over time.
Gender - World Health Organization (WHO)
https://www.who.int › Health topics
I must apologize in advanced for what can be misconstrued as being harsh, but I feel that persons of today (and possibly previous generations prior) have become too overly sensitive. Yes, I think gender should be a separate category from sex and decided by the individual themselves.hover11 wrote:Jared,
Are you one of those persons who are of the belief that gender should not be on a birth certificate and children should choose what they want to be later on?
Jared Mohammed wrote:I must apologize in advanced for what can be misconstrued as being harsh, but I feel that persons of today (and possibly previous generations prior) have become too overly sensitive. Yes, I think gender should be a separate category from sex and decided by the individual themselves.hover11 wrote:Jared,
Are you one of those persons who are of the belief that gender should not be on a birth certificate and children should choose what they want to be later on?
People love to make accusations to the point of promoting bigotry, just for having a choice for a person's gender identity.
No, I don't really watch movies that often. Also don't you need a subscription to view it?paid_influencer wrote:jared did you see the movie Badhaai Do on zeetv what did you think about it
Except that does not or rarely does ever happen. But alot of persons would just stereotype everyone to adhere to their own ideology.alfa wrote:Jared Mohammed wrote:I must apologize in advanced for what can be misconstrued as being harsh, but I feel that persons of today (and possibly previous generations prior) have become too overly sensitive. Yes, I think gender should be a separate category from sex and decided by the individual themselves.hover11 wrote:Jared,
Are you one of those persons who are of the belief that gender should not be on a birth certificate and children should choose what they want to be later on?
People love to make accusations to the point of promoting bigotry, just for having a choice for a person's gender identity.
I believe when you start pushing that ideaology on younger kids that's called grooming. Do you support a big stink transexual in drag reading stories to little kids or same freak wanting to use the same bathroom as your daughters because he identifies as a woman?
Except, there has been no LGBTQ+ organization that has tried to legalize pedophilia. It should never be legalized, same goes for necrophilia and beastiphilia.hover11 wrote:Jared,
Don't you think you a little too woke? Things are normalised so they become acceptable, especially among the young impressionable minds... According to an atheist friend of mine- these are all building blocks until they legalize "psychiatric disorders" like peodophilia.
You could have just read the last two parapgraphs, I posted one or two messages ago.st7 wrote:are you denying there aren't sick men out there who is abusing the current climate to suit their predatory needs?
are you denying because of the current 'woke and cancel culture', a man with ulterior motives wont come up with the idea and say he identifies as a woman, and will proceed to use the female bathrooms?
if you agree you know how sick men can be, why wont they abuse that 'privilege' to target women, or little girls, for rape?
Jared Mohammed wrote:You could have just read the last two parapgraphs, I posted one or two messages ago.st7 wrote:are you denying there aren't sick men out there who is abusing the current climate to suit their predatory needs?
are you denying because of the current 'woke and cancel culture', a man with ulterior motives wont come up with the idea and say he identifies as a woman, and will proceed to use the female bathrooms?
if you agree you know how sick men can be, why wont they abuse that 'privilege' to target women, or little girls, for rape?
As I have stated, you should punish those who have commited or were planning to commit said atoricities.
You shouldn't make baseless assumptions just because you believe, and mind you wittout any evidence to back up those claims, that they are more susceptible in those types of crimes.
Use a url shortener, this forum has a tendency to "cut" links that are considered to long.st7 wrote:Jared Mohammed wrote:You could have just read the last two parapgraphs, I posted one or two messages ago.st7 wrote:are you denying there aren't sick men out there who is abusing the current climate to suit their predatory needs?
are you denying because of the current 'woke and cancel culture', a man with ulterior motives wont come up with the idea and say he identifies as a woman, and will proceed to use the female bathrooms?
if you agree you know how sick men can be, why wont they abuse that 'privilege' to target women, or little girls, for rape?
As I have stated, you should punish those who have commited or were planning to commit said atoricities.
You shouldn't make baseless assumptions just because you believe, and mind you wittout any evidence to back up those claims, that they are more susceptible in those types of crimes.
i am not making baseless assumptions. i am simply asking you if you are denying those kind of people exist.
according to your logic, if i do not have evidence of men in general being predatory and smart enough to come up with a plan as stated above, then men like that don't exist?
you sound pretty emotional in your responses. i was asking you logical questions.
here is one proof btw: https://www.kxii.com/content/news/Trans ... 20451.html
here is another one: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/ed ... story.html
Jared Mohammed wrote:Use a url shortener, this forum has a tendency to "cut" links that are considered to long.st7 wrote:Jared Mohammed wrote:You could have just read the last two parapgraphs, I posted one or two messages ago.st7 wrote:are you denying there aren't sick men out there who is abusing the current climate to suit their predatory needs?
are you denying because of the current 'woke and cancel culture', a man with ulterior motives wont come up with the idea and say he identifies as a woman, and will proceed to use the female bathrooms?
if you agree you know how sick men can be, why wont they abuse that 'privilege' to target women, or little girls, for rape?
As I have stated, you should punish those who have commited or were planning to commit said atoricities.
You shouldn't make baseless assumptions just because you believe, and mind you wittout any evidence to back up those claims, that they are more susceptible in those types of crimes.
i am not making baseless assumptions. i am simply asking you if you are denying those kind of people exist.
according to your logic, if i do not have evidence of men in general being predatory and smart enough to come up with a plan as stated above, then men like that don't exist?
you sound pretty emotional in your responses. i was asking you logical questions.
here is one proof btw: https://www.kxii.com/content/news/Trans ... 20451.html
here is another one: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/ed ... story.html
Secondly, how can you determine emotions based upon a text, it was just stating that you haven't read either two messages. I have even added extra context on the previous messages to orevent if from sounding like that.
Thirdly, read the above text. I have stated that just because minority of persons in a particular community has done a crime, does not mean that it presents the entire group of persons who belong in said community.
You would think that being born in Trinidad and Tobago where a substantial portion of the older generation (and some of the younger ones) tend to be racist, would have taught you to not make accusations and assumptions based upon a collectivist mindset. Rather we should judge an person based upon the individual themsleves.
For that, yes. I agree with the WHO's definition of gender.paid_influencer wrote:jared do you agree with teh WHO definiton of gender
https://www.who.int/health-topics/gender
I am unsure that you have read any of my responses or read your own message. I would politely ask you to do so since your third point just contradicts your own statement. I have mentioned by stance on the matter thrice and I will not repeat it as that would seem as spam beyond that point.st7 wrote:Jared Mohammed wrote:Use a url shortener, this forum has a tendency to "cut" links that are considered to long.st7 wrote:Jared Mohammed wrote:You could have just read the last two parapgraphs, I posted one or two messages ago.st7 wrote:are you denying there aren't sick men out there who is abusing the current climate to suit their predatory needs?
are you denying because of the current 'woke and cancel culture', a man with ulterior motives wont come up with the idea and say he identifies as a woman, and will proceed to use the female bathrooms?
if you agree you know how sick men can be, why wont they abuse that 'privilege' to target women, or little girls, for rape?
As I have stated, you should punish those who have commited or were planning to commit said atoricities.
You shouldn't make baseless assumptions just because you believe, and mind you wittout any evidence to back up those claims, that they are more susceptible in those types of crimes.
i am not making baseless assumptions. i am simply asking you if you are denying those kind of people exist.
according to your logic, if i do not have evidence of men in general being predatory and smart enough to come up with a plan as stated above, then men like that don't exist?
you sound pretty emotional in your responses. i was asking you logical questions.
here is one proof btw: https://www.kxii.com/content/news/Trans ... 20451.html
here is another one: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/ed ... story.html
Secondly, how can you determine emotions based upon a text, it was just stating that you haven't read either two messages. I have even added extra context on the previous messages to orevent if from sounding like that.
Thirdly, read the above text. I have stated that just because minority of persons in a particular community has done a crime, does not mean that it presents the entire group of persons who belong in said community.
You would think that being born in Trinidad and Tobago where a substantial portion of the older generation (and some of the younger ones) tend to be racist, would have taught you to not make accusations and assumptions based upon a collectivist mindset. Rather we should judge an person based upon the individual themsleves.
1. the links works for me when i click on them - idk what's your excuse.
2. the way you have responded to me shows how emotional you are being. you have not answered any questions i presented and decided to keep repeating your narrative.
3. i also have not stated anything about stigmatising any groups whatsoever, you are the one who is saying this or projecting this onto me.
i was going to add a disclaimer on my original post saying that i am not attacking or stigmatising anyone because i know eventually you would say something like this, but i left it out just to laugh at you being so predictable. you are failing to see the bigger picture and how it affects everyone.
it is a fact that women are the major victims of sexual assaults, and most of them are done by men. it does not matter who the man is, who they identify as, who they dress up as, who they are in society. but your main concern right now is that 'transgender women are not men who do not sexually assault women'
if you cannot view my links, feel free to google 'transgender woman sexually abuses women in female bathrooms' and see how many articles come up.
feel free to respond to this post if you're planning to answer my initial questions.
Jared Mohammed wrote:Also if you wish to know, I am into older women - around 30+ and preferably those whom are muscular. Think Kashma Maharaj. Especially if they have a strapon, the bigger the better.
[attachment=0]1344503.jpg
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: death365, shiva_0001 and 9 guests