Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Arshad was only involved in construction and commissioning, his company's involvement is over. He shouldn't have those drawings in his possession. Of course I will not share his contact information with some stranger on tuner.sMASH wrote:Them use my instrumentation drawings to retrofit the gauges and switches.
I should have taken arshad number when I saw him, oui.
All they ask for is the badge and one of the nsme tags on the coveralls, when u leaving . Lolwing wrote:Arshad was only involved in construction and commissioning, his company's involvement is over. He shouldn't have those drawings in his possession. Of course I will not share his contact information with some stranger on tuner.sMASH wrote:Them use my instrumentation drawings to retrofit the gauges and switches.
I should have taken arshad number when I saw him, oui.
sMASH wrote:So they saying that co2 injection is carbon capture? Wow, lol okay.
And the back.... Like,
I need a p n Id. The detsils is what I interested in.
I have an idea, just need a comparison.
nervewrecker wrote:sMASH wrote:So they saying that co2 injection is carbon capture? Wow, lol okay.
And the back.... Like,
I need a p n Id. The detsils is what I interested in.
I have an idea, just need a comparison.
Isnt it? At any given time a volume of CO2 is contained.
De Dragon wrote:nervewrecker wrote:sMASH wrote:So they saying that co2 injection is carbon capture? Wow, lol okay.
And the back.... Like,
I need a p n Id. The detsils is what I interested in.
I have an idea, just need a comparison.
Isnt it? At any given time a volume of CO2 is contained.
Yes, and methanol plants have been doing it since the early nineties here.
sMASH wrote:Lol... REcapture, as it was the waste product from a previous process.
But where they getting their co2 from?
From an auto thermal like methanex?
Or do they have some other process that co2 is a waste?
If u have to generate it to use it. Then they really should not claim carbon capture..
If Dat is carbon capture, then. The process is also methane capture. Cause methane is a green house gas and also injected into the process.
Some process plants generate co2 by burning methane with air. The ammonia plants do so to remove carbon from the gas streams. Some methanol pants use the co2 waste from the ammonia pants, as feed stock for its process. It co2 makes the process more efficient as its brings it closer to stoichiometric.nervewrecker wrote:sMASH wrote:Lol... REcapture, as it was the waste product from a previous process.
But where they getting their co2 from?
From an auto thermal like methanex?
Or do they have some other process that co2 is a waste?
If u have to generate it to use it. Then they really should not claim carbon capture..
If Dat is carbon capture, then. The process is also methane capture. Cause methane is a green house gas and also injected into the process.
Open to correction here but CO2 is removed from the atmosphere. I know for a fact massy sells CO2 because I asked about it for usage. Unsure if they purchase from massy or have their own plant. There is a nitrogen plant on site, compressor, condenser etc, cant recall seeing a CO2 plant.
CO2 increases efficiency and yield.
I think CGCL has their own CO2 plant to capture from the atmosphere.
sMASH wrote:Cgcl capturing co2 from the air is music to my ears. I was wondering of it is feasible to extract co2 from air, as it's a lot of air to process, to get the co2 in the quantities necessary for a process plant.
Now I want to know how THEY do it... Do they do like the ammonia pants and chemically scrub it from air, or would they do like what I thinking about doing and chill it from the air....
sMASH wrote:It's INNN the name... Like boy scouts.
LIQUIFIED natural gas.
The ting about trini I can't stand is, they invent a reason to justify the bs.
*rocking of boats*.
Do they freeze the oils on tankers too....
Mc.
Traditionally, yes.maj. tom wrote:Industrially CO2 is produced by combustion of methane, since distillation and liquefaction from air would be inefficient and low yield.
They probably also don't waste it when created as a byproduct of other reactions like here:
I think Amazon has a machine to create dry ice. Removes CO2 from the air.sMASH wrote:Traditionally, yes.maj. tom wrote:Industrially CO2 is produced by combustion of methane, since distillation and liquefaction from air would be inefficient and low yield.
They probably also don't waste it when created as a byproduct of other reactions like here:
But given the new green revolution, not sure if newer places trying other methods.
I personally gonna try freezing it out of the air.
Yes.nervewrecker wrote:I think Amazon has a machine to create dry ice. Removes CO2 from the air.sMASH wrote:Traditionally, yes.maj. tom wrote:Industrially CO2 is produced by combustion of methane, since distillation and liquefaction from air would be inefficient and low yield.
They probably also don't waste it when created as a byproduct of other reactions like here:
But given the new green revolution, not sure if newer places trying other methods.
I personally gonna try freezing it out of the air.
Gonna build your own?
Was researching possible sources for my use.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests