Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Yup all true, that's why I kept moving from job to job. Every new job was a pay increase for me. Some months I was dead broke after paying out bills and mortgages. Using the motorbike helped offset the gas cost.shake d livin wake d dead wrote:for what it's worth zr, if what you say is really true, hats of to you
Redman wrote:Of course the rest of the article is also a conspiracy between the NY times, PNM and Texaco.Better Sites Elsewhere
Refineries have been shutting down not only because of the oversupply of oil in international markets but also because many companies say they find it more cost-effective to refine crude either where it is produced or where it is sold rather than at intermediate points such as the Caribbean islands.
The Caribbean refineries were built mainly to produce fuel oil for utility companies and factories in the northeastern United States. These customers have reduced their needs through energy conservation and in some cases have shifted to cleaner-burning and less-expensive natural gas. The refineries, some of them built more than 50 years ago, also find it difficult to compete with more efficient modern plants.
Here is a excellent review of the time. The truth seems quite a bit more complex than ZR s spin.
https://books.google.tt/books?id=W9k-BA ... ts&f=false
When Texaco was forced to sell to PNM they had 3000 workers.De Dragon wrote:I wouldn't overexert my self trying to rebut Red Plastic Bag. Imagine, an oil company in the post boom days, and the start of the recession in 1984 where oil reached $29 a barrel declining to $14 in 1986 selling off an assetOh the horror!
![]()
In fact the PNM dummies were fiscally irresponsible to purchase an asset solely to save jobs and fear of the union and loss of votes. Fast forward to JUHN Scarfy and his present crop of dummies shutting down and selling a refinery, (when every million dollar study never advised that) just as a new boom is about to start in Guyana, and you see the bankruptcy of ideas and thought of the PNM for decades.
zoom rader wrote:When Texaco was forced to sell to PNM they had 3000 workers.De Dragon wrote:I wouldn't overexert my self trying to rebut Red Plastic Bag. Imagine, an oil company in the post boom days, and the start of the recession in 1984 where oil reached $29 a barrel declining to $14 in 1986 selling off an assetOh the horror!
![]()
In fact the PNM dummies were fiscally irresponsible to purchase an asset solely to save jobs and fear of the union and loss of votes. Fast forward to JUHN Scarfy and his present crop of dummies shutting down and selling a refinery, (when every million dollar study never advised that) just as a new boom is about to start in Guyana, and you see the bankruptcy of ideas and thought of the PNM for decades.
When PNM ended Petrotrin they sent 5500 workers home.
2500 extra PNM ppl for make believe work.
What OWTU and PNM feared in 1984 was that the new buyer was going to restructure Texaco and sent workers home.
PNM killed what Texaco established,they shut down the Trade school that they had and the private secondary school.
Redman wont talk about the rape that PNM did to an established Texaco. That rape was money was given to PNM party hacks as contracts and setting up of new useless companies like Trintomar, Trintoc, Trintopec, Trinmar, Tesoro.
Then Redman is quoting a book written by a PNM hack that served both Chambers and Manning to cover up the raping of Texaco.
Redman will fool dumb PNM folk with that. He was probably was not even born when Texaco was forced to sell by a con job.
zoom rader wrote:Redman wrote:Of course the rest of the article is also a conspiracy between the NY times, PNM and Texaco.Better Sites Elsewhere
Refineries have been shutting down not only because of the oversupply of oil in international markets but also because many companies say they find it more cost-effective to refine crude either where it is produced or where it is sold rather than at intermediate points such as the Caribbean islands.
The Caribbean refineries were built mainly to produce fuel oil for utility companies and factories in the northeastern United States. These customers have reduced their needs through energy conservation and in some cases have shifted to cleaner-burning and less-expensive natural gas. The refineries, some of them built more than 50 years ago, also find it difficult to compete with more efficient modern plants.
Here is a excellent review of the time. The truth seems quite a bit more complex than ZR s spin.
https://books.google.tt/books?id=W9k-BA ... ts&f=false
Again one must be carefull when reading fake news and books .The authors of this story had their own agendas. One is a known PNM board member that served in the Chambers and Manning era
And you adgenda is to try and protect PNM with misinformation. You was not around when Teacxo was forced to be sold.Redman wrote:zoom rader wrote:Redman wrote:Of course the rest of the article is also a conspiracy between the NY times, PNM and Texaco.Better Sites Elsewhere
Refineries have been shutting down not only because of the oversupply of oil in international markets but also because many companies say they find it more cost-effective to refine crude either where it is produced or where it is sold rather than at intermediate points such as the Caribbean islands.
The Caribbean refineries were built mainly to produce fuel oil for utility companies and factories in the northeastern United States. These customers have reduced their needs through energy conservation and in some cases have shifted to cleaner-burning and less-expensive natural gas. The refineries, some of them built more than 50 years ago, also find it difficult to compete with more efficient modern plants.
Here is a excellent review of the time. The truth seems quite a bit more complex than ZR s spin.
https://books.google.tt/books?id=W9k-BA ... ts&f=false
Again one must be carefull when reading fake news and books .The authors of this story had their own agendas. One is a known PNM board member that served in the Chambers and Manning era
Yes your agenda is clear.....its been clear for a long time.
Your spin on this is a simplistic bigoted misinterpreted twist of facts.
And you adgenda is to try and protect PNM with misinformation. You was not around when Teacxo was forced to be sold.
Redman wrote:And you adgenda is to try and protect PNM with misinformation. You was not around when Teacxo was forced to be sold.
You think you are the only one who lived through it?
You feel that it is you alone that has experience, perspective and knowledge?
You of all people crying down the messenger?
Hypocrisy of no mean quality.
Proving that a stopped clock is right twice a day,you not wrong in that the PaP,Point Fortin,and Santa Flora refineries were forced to be sold....by a GLOBAL glut in refinery capacity,lower oil prices,demand destruction.
In the 80s 30% of the US refineries were closed-due to legislative changes as well
A cursory awareness of the true history of this notoriously cyclical industry would show that world wide refinery count went down in the 80s.
Screen Shot 2020-03-14 at 8.58.43 AM.png
Screen Shot 2020-03-14 at 9.14.15 AM.png
Every thing Red is a clownRedress10 wrote:Redman wrote:And you adgenda is to try and protect PNM with misinformation. You was not around when Teacxo was forced to be sold.
You think you are the only one who lived through it?
You feel that it is you alone that has experience, perspective and knowledge?
You of all people crying down the messenger?
Hypocrisy of no mean quality.
Proving that a stopped clock is right twice a day,you not wrong in that the PaP,Point Fortin,and Santa Flora refineries were forced to be sold....by a GLOBAL glut in refinery capacity,lower oil prices,demand destruction.
In the 80s 30% of the US refineries were closed-due to legislative changes as well
A cursory awareness of the true history of this notoriously cyclical industry would show that world wide refinery count went down in the 80s.
Screen Shot 2020-03-14 at 8.58.43 AM.png
Screen Shot 2020-03-14 at 9.14.15 AM.png
And you would think that after you laid out all these facts he would respond right?
Nope!!! He just goes silent hoping that it dies down for him to come in later and share more misinformation. He all over the forum except here.
He already try to rewrite and reshape history and move on. Damage already done if it wasn't for ppl such as yourself to come and give an alternative view.
His sole purose on this forum is to share misinformation and spread hate.
Yeah forgot PNMrspann wrote:Everything red?
rspann wrote:I was thinking red woman.
Pum pum is Pum pum and it doh matter wat colour, just dont let them live with you.De Dragon wrote:rspann wrote:I was thinking red woman.
You know zr only like the dark coloured PNM types.
zoom rader wrote:Pum pum is Pum pum and it doh matter wat colour, just dont let them live with you.De Dragon wrote:rspann wrote:I was thinking red woman.
You know zr only like the dark coloured PNM types.
rspann wrote:That is the kind rent money does spend on.
When done he against pnm.
rspann wrote:Free thing no good and good thing no free. Not even a box of KFC or a lil nails price?
pugboy wrote:or a weaverspann wrote:Free thing no good and good thing no free. Not even a box of KFC or a lil nails price?
paid_influencer wrote:
You know what would help relieve stress? less crime. stable employment. affordable food and medicines. and a forking pension. a pension
Somehow in my head when i hear that macheal song, I get it to be,
"We work hard
whole week
We deserve a pension!
and since that get in my head I cyar handle that macheal song. It just irritating meh. I want meh forking pension for at 65 years F**K ALLYUH 65 YEARS F**K ALLYUH
paid_influencer wrote:here's the thing. You're using the argument that people should save for a rainy day. That's good, you were taught that. You have extra income so you think everyone has extra income.
But do you realize that for people who making below a living wage, people in poverty, every day is a rainy day? There is no extra income. Try surviving on minimum wage, which hundreds of thousands of people on the island do every week, and talk about annuity and whatever you rich people have.
This jackassness about raising NIS pension to 65 is a big f**king ashole thing. They want people to work and work and work and dead without ever getting a day in retirement. It have plenty of people who don't qualify for NIS pension either because they can't get stable employment, are self-employed like planting and selling in the market, or they have jobs at home, like raising children. These people have made legitimate contribution to the development of the country over decades and have legitimate claim to a right to retire (which really means being able to afford food and medications when you can no longer work).
If you rather live in a society that doesn't care about people, well you get what you deserve when it comes to your doorstep.
paid_influencer wrote:neoliberal brain seeks to justify the continued exploitation of the underclasses by making it individual. Why didn't he do this? Why didn't she do that? Without ever questioning if the system is set up to enable the same exploitation that directs all resources upwards.
paid_influencer wrote:here's the thing. You're using the argument that people should save for a rainy day. That's good, you were taught that. You have extra income so you think everyone has extra income.
But do you realize that for people who making below a living wage, people in poverty, every day is a rainy day? There is no extra income. Try surviving on minimum wage, which hundreds of thousands of people on the island do every week, and talk about annuity and whatever you rich people have.
This jackassness about raising NIS pension to 65 is a big f**king ashole thing. They want people to work and work and work and dead without ever getting a day in retirement. It have plenty of people who don't qualify for NIS pension either because they can't get stable employment, are self-employed like planting and selling in the market, or they have jobs at home, like raising children. These people have made legitimate contribution to the development of the country over decades and have legitimate claim to a right to retire (which really means being able to afford food and medications when you can no longer work).
If you rather live in a society that doesn't care about people, well you get what you deserve when it comes to your doorstep.
The_Honourable wrote:So... basically every day for decades was a rainy day for you? Saving for a rainy day is the most casual and basic financial lesson you learn. If someone is in a rainy day for decades says a lot about that person.
All that talk about underclass and exploitation is just a front. You still haven't answered my question. All these decades you were depending on a government pension when you reach 65? additionally, no plan b in place if the ministry blank yuh?
When Manning switched the senior citizens pension to a grant 20 or so years ago, that should have alerted you that getting this specific pension wasn't a guarantee. I would like to think you looked at other investment vehicles to make sure that you would be ok at retirement. But knowing you, you probably didn't want to save your money with a bank, credit union, insurance or virtually any other financial institution as they "encourage the capitalist system."
Now machel song triggering you because you don't have a pension and feel entitled to one by the government?
Stop
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 37 guests