Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Strugglerzinc wrote:How long they paying the pension?
eliteauto wrote:take the 15K and open a parlour or doubles stand
redmanjp wrote:So just looking to see what's the best retirement plan out there with good growth rates and so on.
A rep from one company approached me about this as well as life insurance.
So we did a projection. Based on a retirement age of 65 (in 28 yrs) AND assuming i put in an initial lumpsum of $15000 and have monthly premiums of $1000, i retire with
$4700/mth pension at a rate of 4.5% and 3.5% (there are 2 funds)
$6600/mth at 6.5% and 5%
the ave rate of growth since inception however has been 9.3% and 4.5% respectively
(min. guaranteed is 1% and 0% p.a.)
so are those good rates or can i get better rates elsewhere?
RBphoto wrote:eliteauto wrote:take the 15K and open a parlour or doubles stand
^^^This!!!! Pensions are for suckers. Forget about the tax rebates as well. Invest in a business and lease a car and claim back for that. Real benefits while you are still able bodied.
Redman wrote:Contemplate what the 4700 purchasing power would be in28 years..
I would say buy the 1st scheme and dollar cost average monthly.
And buy shares.
Build a portfolio of good cos...
Pay yourself the fees.
Slartibartfast wrote:redmanjp wrote:So just looking to see what's the best retirement plan out there with good growth rates and so on.
A rep from one company approached me about this as well as life insurance.
So we did a projection. Based on a retirement age of 65 (in 28 yrs) AND assuming i put in an initial lumpsum of $15000 and have monthly premiums of $1000, i retire with
$4700/mth pension at a rate of 4.5% and 3.5% (there are 2 funds)
$6600/mth at 6.5% and 5%
the ave rate of growth since inception however has been 9.3% and 4.5% respectively
(min. guaranteed is 1% and 0% p.a.)
so are those good rates or can i get better rates elsewhere?
Ok, a few things I learned since I been going through this a couple years now.
Projections don't mean sh!t. I was quoted 15%, 10% and 4.5% projections.
Average rate of growth since inception doesn't mean sh!t. These funds most likely started in the 80s or 90s when the international markets were booming. I got quoted an average rate of about 11% when I was signing up with Guardian.
The guaranteed is only on the premiums you pay under the pension plan and is calculated at maturity. This is the catch that I only found out after months of pestering.
Here is what I wasn't told. The average over the past 5 years was less than 1%. The fees incurred also made sure I never turned a profit (in 5 years with the plan so far). Now, after five years I have lost about $15,000.
They will tell you, "it is a long term investment and you won't see returns until after a good few years" and "everywhere going through a recession now so everywhere is giving poor returns"
Here is the thing, you are supposed to be giving them your money to manage because they are supposedly better at managing it than you. If they can't turn a profit due to the recession then why bother give them your money? Also a 4.5% return means that on every $1,000 you have you get back $45. At that rate you are better off doing what the others here said. Save your money and use it to start something on the side.
If it's with Guardian though send me a pm, I'll give you some stories of what I experienced.
With Guardian as well they recoup all of their additional fees from your first three years of contributions. I think like 90% - 95% of the first year's contributions are taken by them and then 60% for the second year and like 30% for the third year. Not sure about year 2 and 3 but year I remember cussing up and getting rid of my agent after the first year because of the 90 - 95% charges thing. Like I said, I have lost about $15,000 so far. Also, remember this is a long term investment so I lost $15,000 that would have been compounded over 40 years and 4.5% so I really lost $87,000.car wrote:What guardian life and any other investment company wouldn't tell you is that there is a Maintenance/handling fee of $35 per month per policy. Sagicor charges $25.
These are thing they wouldn't tell you until you ready to close the account or it matures. When you check payment of $35 per month vs the investment of returns most of the times you breaking even or at a loss. You have to invest for a long time to profit and by that length of time your buying power is reduced. You loose most of the time.
There is a number for time I've been approached by life advisors and when I asked about the buying power of my money they could never answer. Their answer is to invest more money to the policy per month to counteract the loss of buying power.
I used to hide from them long before. Now I want them to approach me and try to sell me a policy. I just like to look at their blank faces when I challenge them with questions. They realise that they can't win with me and move on to an easier target.
Slartibartfast wrote:With Guardian as well they recoup all of their additional fees from your first three years of contributions. I think like 90% - 95% of the first year's contributions are taken by them and then 60% for the second year and like 30% for the third year. Not sure about year 2 and 3 but year I remember cussing up and getting rid of my agent after the first year because of the 90 - 95% charges thing. Like I said, I have lost about $15,000 so far. Also, remember this is a long term investment so I lost $15,000 that would have been compounded over 40 years and 4.5% so I really lost $87,000.car wrote:What guardian life and any other investment company wouldn't tell you is that there is a Maintenance/handling fee of $35 per month per policy. Sagicor charges $25.
These are thing they wouldn't tell you until you ready to close the account or it matures. When you check payment of $35 per month vs the investment of returns most of the times you breaking even or at a loss. You have to invest for a long time to profit and by that length of time your buying power is reduced. You loose most of the time.
There is a number for time I've been approached by life advisors and when I asked about the buying power of my money they could never answer. Their answer is to invest more money to the policy per month to counteract the loss of buying power.
I used to hide from them long before. Now I want them to approach me and try to sell me a policy. I just like to look at their blank faces when I challenge them with questions. They realise that they can't win with me and move on to an easier target.
When I called the sales rep also didn`t know the difference between simple and compound interest and flat out told me I wouldn`t understand the equations that the actuarial department uses to calculate returns because it real complicated. I tell her maybe for someone without CXC passes that doesn`t know what compound interest is.
Anyway, in their defense, I have a new agent now and he seems willing to show me the ins and out of the policy once I send him some details and was upset that I was treated like that.
Yeah I understand that. All I wanted to see was how they calculated my returns for the years so far though. I had to do account in UWI as part of my degree so I understand annuities, future value, present value etc. Extremely simple stuff that can be easily derived from first principals. I knew they were taking money out for something and I wanted to see exactly how much they were taking out and what interest rate I was actually getting.Miktay wrote:Nah. Returns are simple maths. The time value of money.
http://www.zenwealth.com/businessfinanc ... lator.html
Life expectancy...on the other hand...iz actuarial science. AKA probabilities based on history and lifestyle
redmanjp wrote:so if guardian takes 90-95% the 1st year then i shouldnt put in a lumpsum initally?
and 90-94% of what exactly- the interest alone?
cherrypopper wrote:every body complaining of guardian yes .hmmm
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 9 guests