Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Rory Phoulorie wrote:The Project Manager is only as good as the Contract Documents that he has to work with. If the Drawings, Specifications and Conditions of Contract are not properly defined, I don't care how many PMP letters you have behind your name, a Contractor will do what he wants and make you pay extra to get what you actually want.
I hope your Architect, Engineers and Quantity Surveyor did a thorough job in designing your Project and preparing the construction documents.
AbstractPoetic wrote:@Vexx Dogg, I thought Rahtid was a contractor and not a project manager?
sizzla89 wrote:BOnce the client and contract accepts and agrees to the design and price it "should not under normal circumstances" have a variation.
Mr. Red Sleeper wrote:sizzla89 wrote:BOnce the client and contract accepts and agrees to the design and price it "should not under normal circumstances" have a variation.
Sorry there pal but as experience has shown, even the simplest or smallest of projects can have variations.
From what i have learned, the Project managers job to LIMIT these variances as much as possible by way of proper scheduling,planning, etc.,and more importantly getting the client/contractor to understand the issues, have solutions to the issues and overcome those challenges with as little hindrance to the projects' completion while maintaining peace of mind for the client first and foremost and in an ideal world, contractor(s)/ suppliers.
Mr. Red Sleeper wrote:sizzla89 wrote:BOnce the client and contract accepts and agrees to the design and price it "should not under normal circumstances" have a variation.
Sorry there pal but as experience has shown, even the simplest or smallest of projects can have variations.
From what i have learned, the Project managers job to LIMIT these variances as much as possible by way of proper scheduling,planning, etc.,and more importantly getting the client/contractor to understand the issues, have solutions to the issues and overcome those challenges with as little hindrance to the projects' completion while maintaining peace of mind for the client first and foremost and in an ideal world, contractor(s)/ suppliers.
sizzla89 wrote:Agreed!
Maybe i didnt word my statements properly...Depending on the procurement system the client/Project Manager takes we can hold the contractor to the given price he/she would of signed to from the inception of the Project.
Variation must be justified. (economic factors can come into play such as variations in the price of material on the market)
Your point is noted tho.
Abstract Poetic with respect to having an accent and locals thinking your a push over...I am quite aware of what your referring too. I myself am originally from England and have seen contractors put my father though thereapy when he was building his house.
AbstractPoetic wrote:Thanks guys.
@Rory, I understand where you're coming from, but was under the impression a project manager would save me both time and money with searching for and overseeing the work of the contractors. Also, I'm not looking to negotiate prices. I want one figure upfront and that's that. If you need to quote me extra to accommodate for material/labor increases, then do so. I have no intentions of paying extra funds during/after completion of a project.
@Vexx Dogg, I thought Rahtid was a contractor and not a project manager?
DrunkenMaster16 wrote:AbstractPoetic wrote:@Vexx Dogg, I thought Rahtid was a contractor and not a project manager?
Rahtid is a contractor but can manage a project and will be one of the better ones to get your job done.. ie mason fails to show for work rahtid will get someone else that same day and fire the original mason.(good links and has experience)
Mr. Red Sleeper wrote:sizzla89 wrote:BOnce the client and contract accepts and agrees to the design and price it "should not under normal circumstances" have a variation.
Sorry there pal but as experience has shown, even the simplest or smallest of projects can have variations.
From what i have learned, the Project managers job to LIMIT these variances as much as possible by way of proper scheduling,planning, etc.,and more importantly getting the client/contractor to understand the issues, have solutions to the issues and overcome those challenges with as little hindrance to the projects' completion while maintaining peace of mind for the client first and foremost and in an ideal world, contractor(s)/ suppliers.
Rahtid wrote:Somehow, one figure upfront never works, there will be additional costs somewhere during the works.
AbstractPoetic wrote:Rahtid wrote:Somehow, one figure upfront never works, there will be additional costs somewhere during the works.
Thanks Rahtid, but why won't agreeing to a flat fee upfront work? My figure incorporates these "additional costs" as part of the flat fee, which is several times over what I think the project will cost me. I will PM you.
ETA: My issue has been with the inability of others to justify the cost, especially when it comes to material. At one point, material even went missing and guess who had to incur the fees? It's complete nonsense. Best I hire some Mexicans from the USA and send them to Trinidad to get the job done. They will complete it in a month, arrive on time and cost less. Steups.
Rahtid wrote:AbstractPoetic wrote:Rahtid wrote:Somehow, one figure upfront never works, there will be additional costs somewhere during the works.
Thanks Rahtid, but why won't agreeing to a flat fee upfront work? My figure incorporates these "additional costs" as part of the flat fee, which is several times over what I think the project will cost me. I will PM you.
ETA: My issue has been with the inability of others to justify the cost, especially when it comes to material. At one point, material even went missing and guess who had to incur the fees? It's complete nonsense. Best I hire some Mexicans from the USA and send them to Trinidad to get the job done. They will complete it in a month, arrive on time and cost less. Steups.
Fee being the PM's fee?
I was saying that the price (material/labour) would not be the same as the agreed price on teh contract.
AbstractPoetic wrote:Rahtid wrote:AbstractPoetic wrote:Rahtid wrote:Somehow, one figure upfront never works, there will be additional costs somewhere during the works.
Thanks Rahtid, but why won't agreeing to a flat fee upfront work? My figure incorporates these "additional costs" as part of the flat fee, which is several times over what I think the project will cost me. I will PM you.
ETA: My issue has been with the inability of others to justify the cost, especially when it comes to material. At one point, material even went missing and guess who had to incur the fees? It's complete nonsense. Best I hire some Mexicans from the USA and send them to Trinidad to get the job done. They will complete it in a month, arrive on time and cost less. Steups.
Fee being the PM's fee?
I was saying that the price (material/labour) would not be the same as the agreed price on teh contract.
No, fees associated with the construction.
Why won't the material/labour price be the same as the agreed price?
Before anyone starts working on my project ALL estimated figures will be discussed in full, with in-person visit to the site and details on where material and labor will come from.
I want my PM to discuss and negotiate prices directly with the contractor(s) and in the event of a contractor not doing his job, get someone else. I don't have time for BS. As for the PM fees, that's between him/her and I, excluding any bonuses I wish to pay depending on how pleased I am with the job.
AbstractPoetic wrote:Rahtid wrote:AbstractPoetic wrote:Rahtid wrote:Somehow, one figure upfront never works, there will be additional costs somewhere during the works.
Thanks Rahtid, but why won't agreeing to a flat fee upfront work? My figure incorporates these "additional costs" as part of the flat fee, which is several times over what I think the project will cost me. I will PM you.
ETA: My issue has been with the inability of others to justify the cost, especially when it comes to material. At one point, material even went missing and guess who had to incur the fees? It's complete nonsense. Best I hire some Mexicans from the USA and send them to Trinidad to get the job done. They will complete it in a month, arrive on time and cost less. Steups.
Fee being the PM's fee?
I was saying that the price (material/labour) would not be the same as the agreed price on teh contract.
No, fees associated with the construction.
Why won't the material/labour price be the same as the agreed price?
Before anyone starts working on my project ALL estimated figures will be discussed in full, with in-person visit to the site and details on where material and labor will come from.
I want my PM to discuss and negotiate prices directly with the contractor(s) and in the event of a contractor not doing his job, get someone else. I don't have time for BS. As for the PM fees, that's between him/her and I, excluding any bonuses I wish to pay depending on how pleased I am with the job.
sizzla89 wrote:Just quoting you guys here,
But with respect to fees of material not remaining the same from what was signed on the contract i will say yes and no.
The rational behind this is that once the Scope of work, Bill of quantities are signed to with respect to material, labour this is final. There should not be any variations unless the quantities were underestimated or items of work were ommitted in error etc.
Other than that materials that are signed for shall not attract a variation.
The form of conract will preide over such matters however.
There are stipulations that will be outlined for such occurences.
Rahtid wrote:AbstractPoetic wrote:Rahtid wrote:AbstractPoetic wrote:Rahtid wrote:Somehow, one figure upfront never works, there will be additional costs somewhere during the works.
Thanks Rahtid, but why won't agreeing to a flat fee upfront work? My figure incorporates these "additional costs" as part of the flat fee, which is several times over what I think the project will cost me. I will PM you.
ETA: My issue has been with the inability of others to justify the cost, especially when it comes to material. At one point, material even went missing and guess who had to incur the fees? It's complete nonsense. Best I hire some Mexicans from the USA and send them to Trinidad to get the job done. They will complete it in a month, arrive on time and cost less. Steups.
Fee being the PM's fee?
I was saying that the price (material/labour) would not be the same as the agreed price on teh contract.
No, fees associated with the construction.
Why won't the material/labour price be the same as the agreed price?
Before anyone starts working on my project ALL estimated figures will be discussed in full, with in-person visit to the site and details on where material and labor will come from.
I want my PM to discuss and negotiate prices directly with the contractor(s) and in the event of a contractor not doing his job, get someone else. I don't have time for BS. As for the PM fees, that's between him/her and I, excluding any bonuses I wish to pay depending on how pleased I am with the job.
OMG!![]()
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 10 guests