Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Redress10 wrote:Bro
Western Europe etc not state quarantining citizens. Not sure about asia. Even testing is a private affair. There's no "treatment" so testing in those placesis mainly for surveillance purposes. A numbers game. Every single positive test in TT ends up in state quarantine as far as I could tell. Not sure if it has changed.
I have friends who tested "positive" showing they had covid in the past but had no symptoms etc. They needed to be tested before entering into Dubai so they went to get tested. They were also tested upon entering into Dubai with all the other precautions into play such as temperature check and social distancing.
For an individual to truly know their covid status, they will need to continuously test, either every 7 or 14 days. It can't just be a one off test like some of you all are advocating.
Dohplaydat wrote:Redress10 wrote:Bro
Western Europe etc not state quarantining citizens. Not sure about asia. Even testing is a private affair. There's no "treatment" so testing in those placesis mainly for surveillance purposes. A numbers game. Every single positive test in TT ends up in state quarantine as far as I could tell. Not sure if it has changed.
I have friends who tested "positive" showing they had covid in the past but had no symptoms etc. They needed to be tested before entering into Dubai so they went to get tested. They were also tested upon entering into Dubai with all the other precautions into play such as temperature check and social distancing.
For an individual to truly know their covid status, they will need to continuously test, either every 7 or 14 days. It can't just be a one off test like some of you all are advocating.
By this logic best we just stop testing on the whole yes.
redmanjp wrote:You can test persons who are contacts as long as u let about 7 days pass after exposure. There's a good chance the viral load would have built up enough to generate a positive test. Then test again a few days later if they are not positive yet. Don't need to be symptomatic as u already have 1 criteria with them bring exposed to a positive case.
That way u don't miss asymptomatic ppl who are a significant driver of the outbreak and who end up creating cases which are pending investigation.
I would agree that testing ppl with no exposure and also no symptoms would be wasteful unless there is community spread then a significant portion would be positive
pugboy wrote:chances are 28 days may not be enough
and they will extend the lockdown
the first two weeks could have same rates of infection and the last two some decline under perfect conditions of lockdown but unlikely to drop to desired low levels
I don't expect to see much decrease within the first 4 to 6 weeks. It's likely that infections will flatten during that time.redmanjp wrote:^yeah we may need 2 weeks of a full lockdown then continue a partial for another month
Dohplaydat wrote:redmanjp wrote:You can test persons who are contacts as long as u let about 7 days pass after exposure. There's a good chance the viral load would have built up enough to generate a positive test. Then test again a few days later if they are not positive yet. Don't need to be symptomatic as u already have 1 criteria with them bring exposed to a positive case.
That way u don't miss asymptomatic ppl who are a significant driver of the outbreak and who end up creating cases which are pending investigation.
I would agree that testing ppl with no exposure and also no symptoms would be wasteful unless there is community spread then a significant portion would be positive
It's too late to adopt that approach, it's out of control right now. Let's see if in 2 weeks this lockdown brings the cases back down.
maj. tom wrote:To me that would be a severe waste of police resources. We really can't fight this level of ignorance and stupidity in our population.
But come tmrw at 6am, Gary could share some baton and buss head.
pugboy wrote:so where was gg and the enforcing of crowd sizes ?
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:pugboy wrote:so where was gg and the enforcing of crowd sizes ?
The guidelines are from 6am Monday 17th August
paid_influencer wrote:my feeling : the real lockdown coming next Saturday at 2:30pm.
rolling back to Phase 4 (where we are right now) is not a lockdown. Rolling back to phase 4 will keep cases at the current level, but at 46 cases/day that level will soon:
(1) over-run our capacity for contact tracing and testing
(2) bring our 'parallel health care' hospitals (Couva and Caura) ICU and HDU to capacity, and
(3) seriously threaten patient populations in the regular public hospitals (SFGH, POSGH)
The only way out is a full lockdown, Phase 2 or Phase 1 rollback. And I suspect that will happen Saturday once the population had a week to process that things are not normal right now.
Or we possibly could choose the Trump strategy
Dohplaydat wrote:What pisses me off is that Rowley himself said 3 weeks ago, after a handful of untraced cases, that this was the point where many countries lost control, however Trinidad was in a good position to contain it. FFS Keith, why did you go and make the same mistake everyone warned you about?
matr1x wrote:Isn't it obvious that they suppress the numbers to make the government look good for election?
fokhan_96 wrote:If they call another election pnm would still win so it doesn't matter.matr1x wrote:Isn't it obvious that they suppress the numbers to make the government look good for election?
shake d livin wake d dead wrote:Rumourville saying heavy weights with the initials PE and CM tested +
ST Auto wrote:Boishake d livin wake d dead wrote:Rumourville saying heavy weights with the initials PE and CM tested +
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 81 guests