Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
toyolink wrote:I am firm in my belief that the investment in the younger generation was and will always be an absolute requirement for any nation to move forward.
Our inability to manage our investment in building intellectual capital and deploying these resources in a well planned manner cannot be blamed on young ambitious citizens.
High lighting the short comings of students who abused GATE program as justification to disengage this initiative is derive from, and feeds backward thinking and can only yield further disaster for our nation as a whole.
I firmly believe that in-light of our reduced financial capacity the opportunity is here to fix the GATE program and align same with a proper strategic developmental plan.
We must continue to seed hopefulness in our youth and create real paths for their success.
This in my opinion is a matter for urgent serious attention by the Gov't if their ever was one.
toyolink wrote:I am firm in my belief that the investment in the younger generation was and will always be an absolute requirement for any nation to move forward.
Our inability to manage our investment in building intellectual capital and deploying these resources in a well planned manner cannot be blamed on young ambitious citizens.
High lighting the short comings of students who abused GATE program as justification to disengage this initiative is derive from, and feeds backward thinking and can only yield further disaster for our nation as a whole.
I firmly believe that in-light of our reduced financial capacity the opportunity is here to fix the GATE program and align same with a proper strategic developmental plan.
We must continue to seed hopefulness in our youth and create real paths for their success.
This in my opinion is a matter for urgent serious attention by the Gov't if their ever was one.
Dizzy28 wrote:But many nations prosper and move forward with out free tertiary education. Why does the investment have to be in offering it as a free right through citizenship?
matr1x wrote:Ojt provide me a solid direction. It can work for those who want to actually work.
matr1x wrote:In 2008. About a month. In a nice gig
matr1x wrote:University of London. No contacts. They tried to place me well. And I really benefitted.
I did well in the ojt interview. That what I think
matr1x wrote:Engineering. It was in a point lisas gig. I work with them 2 years after, and rolled on.
Ojt can be a massive stepping stone. Think about it, 1 year experience under your belt. That worth it's weight in gold
matr1x wrote:I know! And that sucks. Seriously, for a person fresh out of school, it's the best wakeup you can get
toyolink wrote:To many ambitious young people are being left to languish and forced to adopt a survival of the fittest mentality.
Oil and gas resources mean nothing if the monetary benefits aint directed to sustainable development initiatives, and said strategic imperatives cannot be achieved without high quality human capital.
The pain and discouragement felt by those desirous of achieving a better quality of life is in the most part a result of the state not fulfilling its responsibility to its citizens.
The state must 'meaningfully' get to work on becoming a vehicle for empowerment.
The lip service approaches , self enrichment and aloofness all package in some kind of 'god complex' is what has us in the mess we are in.
Right now the gloom and doom rhetoric has lost its gloss and the downward spiral caused by lost in confidence is on.
.......and the pleds fight amongst themselves for the scraps.
The_Honourable wrote:The OJT program was a brilliant idea. As with everything, there will be slackers.
I have seen many managers who took advantage of trainees while I also seen trainees wasting time with facebook and watsapp. I've had some members of upper management inclusive of CEO's and Board of Directors in the public service stating that a lot of the OJT's work harder and have a better work ethic than many permanent staff. When something goes wrong, these same permanent staff will use the OJTs as a scapegoat.
In terms of GATE, i hope that the government funds degrees that matters to the country.
Drea wrote:The_Honourable wrote:The OJT program was a brilliant idea. As with everything, there will be slackers.
I have seen many managers who took advantage of trainees while I also seen trainees wasting time with facebook and watsapp. I've had some members of upper management inclusive of CEO's and Board of Directors in the public service stating that a lot of the OJT's work harder and have a better work ethic than many permanent staff. When something goes wrong, these same permanent staff will use the OJTs as a scapegoat.
In terms of GATE, i hope that the government funds degrees that matters to the country.
Agreed, as with everything there are the pro and cons, and too often people overshadow the pros by dwelling on the cons. My only suggestion with regards to GATE would be setting criteria for studies as to key areas that the country is lacking and requires skilled workers. Look at the situation with not having a forensic pathologist, one foreigner is doing the job of 10 men/women and Med Sci is practically overcrowded with a waiting list.
Dizzy28 wrote:Drea wrote:The_Honourable wrote:The OJT program was a brilliant idea. As with everything, there will be slackers.
I have seen many managers who took advantage of trainees while I also seen trainees wasting time with facebook and watsapp. I've had some members of upper management inclusive of CEO's and Board of Directors in the public service stating that a lot of the OJT's work harder and have a better work ethic than many permanent staff. When something goes wrong, these same permanent staff will use the OJTs as a scapegoat.
In terms of GATE, i hope that the government funds degrees that matters to the country.
Agreed, as with everything there are the pro and cons, and too often people overshadow the pros by dwelling on the cons. My only suggestion with regards to GATE would be setting criteria for studies as to key areas that the country is lacking and requires skilled workers. Look at the situation with not having a forensic pathologist, one foreigner is doing the job of 10 men/women and Med Sci is practically overcrowded with a waiting list.
You don't pick specialty at the stage of being in Mt Hope (MBBS).
Offering post graduate scholarships to doctors specific to the field of Forensic Pathology would have more benefit than a wholesale free medical education.
maj. tom wrote:There's a lack of people in those positions not because there are none available, but because of the terrible working conditions offered to health professionals by the Government in the public sector.
Qualified people just don't apply because they have already been through so much sheit in their previous years in the hospitals while getting that specialization. That's why so many doctors leave this country when they serve their time. Government offers nothing to keep them here. They all start off as wanting to make Trinidad better... but the reality is different.
wtf wrote:In all honesty its time for that pathologist to retire...He's old and clearly past his best days..
Dizzy28 wrote:wtf wrote:In all honesty its time for that pathologist to retire...He's old and clearly past his best days..
Then we would never get any autopsies done.......seems the Trini ones - McDonald Burris and Des Vignes always on vacation or sick leave.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: shiva_0001 and 117 guests