Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
A battyman.adnj wrote:Vaccinate, don't vaccinate. Only you really know.
Log on tuner, talk $hit, make unsubstantiated claims.
Who is doing that? And why?
Mmoney607 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Covid can easily overwhelm the healthcare system, that is why a parallel healthcare system was setup locally but it too can be easily overwhelmed. No other lifestyle disease is doing that.
These 5 states have less than 10% of ICU beds left as Covid-19 overwhelms hospitals
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/08/31/heal ... index.html
Yes but 100% of those people have "preventable" comorbidities
It still remains a choice and we are entitled to choose NOT to accept such , not because the masses are doing such means automatically I must stop thinking and follow the trend. It's my choice live with it I don't care who took the vaccine regardless of political affiliation, the politicians only care for themselves and need the masses to be guided accordingly which means no stepping out of lineone eye wrote:Fellow citizens such as and username hover11 and Mmoney607.
Why are you denying this vaccine? It is for your own good.
Are you aware of the huge distress every government in the world would be in if this vaccine was unsafe?
Stop this foolishness now before you die from contracting a virus you could have prevented if you took the jab.
UNC members were smart enough to take the jab and they aren't very intelligent at all.
Free thinkers aren't concerned with the so called experts and politics. Free thinkers distance themselves from the sheep and choose their own path. But if two or more free thinkers follow the same path, do they become sheep themselves? Are the anti vaxxers sheep in their own right? Hoover, what say you?one eye wrote:Fellow citizens such as and username hover11 and Mmoney607.
Why are you denying this vaccine? It is for your own good.
Are you aware of the huge distress every government in the world would be in if this vaccine was unsafe?
Stop this foolishness now before you die from contracting a virus you could have prevented if you took the jab.
UNC members were smart enough to take the jab and they aren't very intelligent at all.
one eye wrote:Fellow citizens such as and username hover11 and Mmoney607.
Why are you denying this vaccine? It is for your own good.
Are you aware of the huge distress every government in the world would be in if this vaccine was unsafe?
Stop this foolishness now before you die from contracting a virus you could have prevented if you took the jab.
UNC members were smart enough to take the jab and they aren't very intelligent at all.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Covid can easily overwhelm the healthcare system, that is why a parallel healthcare system was setup locally but it too can be easily overwhelmed. No other lifestyle disease is doing that.
These 5 states have less than 10% of ICU beds left as Covid-19 overwhelms hospitals
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/08/31/heal ... index.html
Yes but 100% of those people have "preventable" comorbidities
Where did you get that statistic?
They were the chosen ones, they seem perfectly fine now and going about their day to day lives but we must fear a virus with over 90 percent recovery rateMmoney607 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Covid can easily overwhelm the healthcare system, that is why a parallel healthcare system was setup locally but it too can be easily overwhelmed. No other lifestyle disease is doing that.
These 5 states have less than 10% of ICU beds left as Covid-19 overwhelms hospitals
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/08/31/heal ... index.html
Yes but 100% of those people have "preventable" comorbidities
Where did you get that statistic?
I extrapolate that from the fact that hundreds of millions have gotten covid and survived. What was the difference between the survivors and the ones that died? It couldn't just be luck.
Mmoney607 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Covid can easily overwhelm the healthcare system, that is why a parallel healthcare system was setup locally but it too can be easily overwhelmed. No other lifestyle disease is doing that.
These 5 states have less than 10% of ICU beds left as Covid-19 overwhelms hospitals
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/08/31/heal ... index.html
Yes but 100% of those people have "preventable" comorbidities
Where did you get that statistic?
I extrapolate that from the fact that hundreds of millions have gotten covid and survived. What was the difference between the survivors and the ones that died? It couldn't just be luck.
hover11 wrote:They were the chosen ones, they seem perfectly fine now and going about their day to day lives but we must fear a virus with over 90 percent recovery rateMmoney607 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Covid can easily overwhelm the healthcare system, that is why a parallel healthcare system was setup locally but it too can be easily overwhelmed. No other lifestyle disease is doing that.
These 5 states have less than 10% of ICU beds left as Covid-19 overwhelms hospitals
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/08/31/heal ... index.html
Yes but 100% of those people have "preventable" comorbidities
Where did you get that statistic?
I extrapolate that from the fact that hundreds of millions have gotten covid and survived. What was the difference between the survivors and the ones that died? It couldn't just be luck.
SMc wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Covid can easily overwhelm the healthcare system, that is why a parallel healthcare system was setup locally but it too can be easily overwhelmed. No other lifestyle disease is doing that.
These 5 states have less than 10% of ICU beds left as Covid-19 overwhelms hospitals
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/08/31/heal ... index.html
Yes but 100% of those people have "preventable" comorbidities
Where did you get that statistic?
I extrapolate that from the fact that hundreds of millions have gotten covid and survived. What was the difference between the survivors and the ones that died? It couldn't just be luck.
This has just confirmed why I felt the urge to give this site a break for the time being....later skaters
MaxPower wrote:Scorn the unvaccinated…
Mmoney607 wrote:SMc wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Covid can easily overwhelm the healthcare system, that is why a parallel healthcare system was setup locally but it too can be easily overwhelmed. No other lifestyle disease is doing that.
These 5 states have less than 10% of ICU beds left as Covid-19 overwhelms hospitals
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/08/31/heal ... index.html
Yes but 100% of those people have "preventable" comorbidities
Where did you get that statistic?
I extrapolate that from the fact that hundreds of millions have gotten covid and survived. What was the difference between the survivors and the ones that died? It couldn't just be luck.
This has just confirmed why I felt the urge to give this site a break for the time being....later skaters
Sorry but you have to understand the context that I am saying this in. According to some on here, they should stop treating unvaccinated persons if the get hospitalized with covid and stop giving unvaccinated persons access to govt services. So I'm saying that if you use that flawed logic then most people who go to hospital should not be treated because whatever they came for would have been preventable.
My position since March 2020 has not changed, protect the vulnerable, everybody else, go about your business as usual.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:SMc wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Mmoney607 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:Covid can easily overwhelm the healthcare system, that is why a parallel healthcare system was setup locally but it too can be easily overwhelmed. No other lifestyle disease is doing that.
These 5 states have less than 10% of ICU beds left as Covid-19 overwhelms hospitals
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/08/31/heal ... index.html
Yes but 100% of those people have "preventable" comorbidities
Where did you get that statistic?
I extrapolate that from the fact that hundreds of millions have gotten covid and survived. What was the difference between the survivors and the ones that died? It couldn't just be luck.
This has just confirmed why I felt the urge to give this site a break for the time being....later skaters
Sorry but you have to understand the context that I am saying this in. According to some on here, they should stop treating unvaccinated persons if the get hospitalized with covid and stop giving unvaccinated persons access to govt services. So I'm saying that if you use that flawed logic then most people who go to hospital should not be treated because whatever they came for would have been preventable.
My position since March 2020 has not changed, protect the vulnerable, everybody else, go about your business as usual.
You went from 100% to "most"?
Odds of dying if infected with covid is 2% (in T&T it's currently 2.9%)
Odds of dying from a covid vaccine is 0.0018%
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-nc ... vents.html
That's 1600x more likely to die if you are infected by Covid than from the vaccine.
Most things people use state hospital resources are "preventable" by the logical that you all are using
sam1978 wrote:MaxPower wrote:Scorn the unvaccinated…
Maxipoo, I agree , they coming in without vaccines or quarantine, we not sure what they bringing , scorn them.
Mmoney607 wrote:I have never said anything about dieing from vaccines. I only talk about vaccine efficacy.
88sins wrote:De Dragon wrote:hover11 wrote:Can you read, Alta is reopening soon you clearly saw I put vaccine hesitant need to be accomodatedst7 wrote:hover - vaccines are sheit. all vaccinated ppl still get covid and infect others, cook my own food, fix my own car, have mba in ba
also hover - govt better have vaccines even when we antivaxxers not going for it and it expiring
i get that right?
Not in perpetuity, and not in those numbers that we're currently carrying.
You see this? it all kinda wrong.
If a million people say "I don't want it" , exactly who do you think you are or the gov't is to disregard adult people's wishes about what they willing to put into their body or not?
If the gov't say that in order to stop crime, is rfid chips & gps bracelets on everybody, whether you want it or not & we tracking everybody whereabouts & even monitoring all of everyone's communications & internet usage, and we could lock you up if you doing something we eh like? that ok too ent?
If people are hesitant, coercion will only further solidify their hesitancy generated by their uncertainty into unwillingness and outright defiance in their refusal. Some may have been on the fence, and that will probably give them a violent shove to the side against, not for vaccination.
All I saying is people will decide what they doing based on their own beliefs, that will be formed by their own knowledge or the lack thereof, and that each individual MUST bear the consequences of his own choices, whether those consequences be + or -
hover11 wrote:With that logic smokers should not be admitted for lung cancer and respiratory problems, alcoholics must not be admitted for liver problems or alcohol poisoning... obese persons should not be admitted for diabetes or heart attacksMmoney607 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:88sins wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:
That's why there are doctors and scientists and epidemiologists and peer-reviewed scientific data to help make informed decisions so people don't have to die or face consequences unnecessarily.
When a person refuses the vaccine and ends up in hospital unable to breathe do they also refuse treatment based on the fact they don't know what is being administered to them or do they exercise their freedom there too?
and you should be aware that there are some people existing today, if you hand them a research paper, even though they may be able to read it, understanding what they reading is a whole differnt story. Even if you put it in the simplest of plain english terms.
funny you should ask that
I've seem people that needed to be intubated fight like hell against it, caused some minor damage to a few dr's in the struggle too. Usually in such cases, it doesn't take them long before they fall unconscious, and then they medical professional will attempt intubate them & usually be successful (provided the airway is clear & not inflamed shut of course).
Also, even in the US, there's document called a DNR (do not resuscitate) form, that you fill that out, need to do that before life saving treatment is required though, & have witnesses & a be in a sane rational lucid state of mind too.
Fear is a hell of a thing. It can cause people to make choices they wouldn't have if they were better informed or more calm and rational. But their reasons are their own, and it's not up to you or me to convince them that they right, wrong or anywhere in between, because the sad truth is, people believe what they want to believe, for the reasons which they alone know why they chose to believe what they do.
Considering the statistics showing the vast majority of hospitalizations and deaths are from unvaccinated persons, what about the strain they put on the economy, health care system, health care workers and the population?
Most things people use state hospital resources are "preventable" by the logical that you all are using.
88sins wrote:@ d dragon
So if tomorrow the state decides that they want to monitor your every movement and activity, and tell you how to live your life and if you decline to comply they can then physically force you into compliance, you got absolutely no problem with that right?
Because you basically saying that the state is the best entity to decide what's best for you, and everyone else, regardless of their own personal preferences and beliefs. Going by that philosophy nobody should have a problem with anything any government does, whether good or bad, and if you do have an issue with the states choices they make for you, just keep that issue to yourself and just do as told at all times.
Gotta let the people be people, and let the sheeple be sheeple, and come to terms with it that the only person whose actions and inactions and consequences each person really has to worry about is their own.
De Dragon wrote:88sins wrote:@ d dragon
So if tomorrow the state decides that they want to monitor your every movement and activity, and tell you how to live your life and if you decline to comply they can then physically force you into compliance, you got absolutely no problem with that right?
Because you basically saying that the state is the best entity to decide what's best for you, and everyone else, regardless of their own personal preferences and beliefs. Going by that philosophy nobody should have a problem with anything any government does, whether good or bad, and if you do have an issue with the states choices they make for you, just keep that issue to yourself and just do as told at all times.
Gotta let the people be people, and let the sheeple be sheeple, and come to terms with it that the only person whose actions and inactions and consequences each person really has to worry about is their own.
Never said that, and to conclude such is a a very far stretch.
At the end of the day, a GORTT was elected, and there are times when they have to decide what is best for the citizenry, no matter what our personal feelings about it are. Any time we want to countermand public mandates, laws or whatever, there are many options available to us, both political, and personal, and we should avail ourselves of them.
88sins wrote:De Dragon wrote:88sins wrote:@ d dragon
So if tomorrow the state decides that they want to monitor your every movement and activity, and tell you how to live your life and if you decline to comply they can then physically force you into compliance, you got absolutely no problem with that right?
Because you basically saying that the state is the best entity to decide what's best for you, and everyone else, regardless of their own personal preferences and beliefs. Going by that philosophy nobody should have a problem with anything any government does, whether good or bad, and if you do have an issue with the states choices they make for you, just keep that issue to yourself and just do as told at all times.
Gotta let the people be people, and let the sheeple be sheeple, and come to terms with it that the only person whose actions and inactions and consequences each person really has to worry about is their own.
Never said that, and to conclude such is a a very far stretch.
At the end of the day, a GORTT was elected, and there are times when they have to decide what is best for the citizenry, no matter what our personal feelings about it are. Any time we want to countermand public mandates, laws or whatever, there are many options available to us, both political, and personal, and we should avail ourselves of them.
Not really, its exactly the same base premise.
A government deciding to implement forced participation in something based on the misguided idea that they know what's best for each and every individual private citizen, while ignoring their desire to not participate. Because that's what's been going on for roughly four months with the SoE, and making vaccination legally mandatory for all people in the country will just be the last step.
IMHO, ppl hadda start studying themselves more, and start minding people business less.
Not about it being contagious but you led to the cause of it in a sense just like you Blame anti vaxxers for existingDe Dragon wrote:hover11 wrote:With that logic smokers should not be admitted for lung cancer and respiratory problems, alcoholics must not be admitted for liver problems or alcohol poisoning... obese persons should not be admitted for diabetes or heart attacksMmoney607 wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:88sins wrote:Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:
That's why there are doctors and scientists and epidemiologists and peer-reviewed scientific data to help make informed decisions so people don't have to die or face consequences unnecessarily.
When a person refuses the vaccine and ends up in hospital unable to breathe do they also refuse treatment based on the fact they don't know what is being administered to them or do they exercise their freedom there too?
and you should be aware that there are some people existing today, if you hand them a research paper, even though they may be able to read it, understanding what they reading is a whole differnt story. Even if you put it in the simplest of plain english terms.
funny you should ask that
I've seem people that needed to be intubated fight like hell against it, caused some minor damage to a few dr's in the struggle too. Usually in such cases, it doesn't take them long before they fall unconscious, and then they medical professional will attempt intubate them & usually be successful (provided the airway is clear & not inflamed shut of course).
Also, even in the US, there's document called a DNR (do not resuscitate) form, that you fill that out, need to do that before life saving treatment is required though, & have witnesses & a be in a sane rational lucid state of mind too.
Fear is a hell of a thing. It can cause people to make choices they wouldn't have if they were better informed or more calm and rational. But their reasons are their own, and it's not up to you or me to convince them that they right, wrong or anywhere in between, because the sad truth is, people believe what they want to believe, for the reasons which they alone know why they chose to believe what they do.
Considering the statistics showing the vast majority of hospitalizations and deaths are from unvaccinated persons, what about the strain they put on the economy, health care system, health care workers and the population?
Most things people use state hospital resources are "preventable" by the logical that you all are using.
![]()
![]()
Hmm, never knew that lung cancer, diabetes, heart disease and cirrhosis were contagious.
You really learn something new everyday on 2NR boy......................
88sins wrote:Just dropping this here.
Three fully vaccinated persons I know tested positive yesterday. All three are considered high risk for negative outcomes. One diabetic, one has a history of clotting and DVT, and all 3 are obese. Their ages range from 42 to 56, one male and 2 female.
2 currently in ICU, 1 having serious respiratory difficulties and may be hospitalized today.
The 2 in ICU 2 given AZ, and one SP, the most recently vaccinated got their last shot 2 months ago, the earliest got it 3 months ago. All 3 work together in the same company.
Reduced risk of transmission? Ok, if you say so.
Reduced risk of severe disease and needing hospitalization. Mhmm, ok.
Please forgive my skepticism.
EDIT
Forgot to mention
The company only has 8 employees, and all but 1 are vaccinated.
So, that's almost 50% of their fully vaccinated workforce that contracted the disease, and 100% of those who did are having severe symptoms.
What are the odds of this.
Feel free to do the math yourself
Slippery slope fallacy.88sins wrote:@ d dragon
So if tomorrow the state decides that they want to monitor your every movement and activity, and tell you how to live your life and if you decline to comply they can then physically force you into compliance, you got absolutely no problem with that right?
Because you basically saying that the state is the best entity to decide what's best for you, and everyone else, regardless of their own personal preferences and beliefs. Going by that philosophy nobody should have a problem with anything any government does, whether good or bad, and if you do have an issue with the states choices they make for you, just keep that issue to yourself and just do as told at all times.
Gotta let the people be people, and let the sheeple be sheeple, and come to terms with it that the only person whose actions and inactions and consequences each person really has to worry about is their own.
De Dragon wrote:
![]()
![]()
![]()
OH MY GOD! Fully vaccinated people can get Covid?
No details on what type of work
Whether protocols that are still supposed to be followed were.
All with comorbidities, so their being in ICU shouldn't be a surprise.
Anecdotal evidence. Possible? Yes. Likely? No.De Dragon wrote:88sins wrote:Just dropping this here.
Three fully vaccinated persons I know tested positive yesterday. All three are considered high risk for negative outcomes. One diabetic, one has a history of clotting and DVT, and all 3 are obese. Their ages range from 42 to 56, one male and 2 female.
2 currently in ICU, 1 having serious respiratory difficulties and may be hospitalized today.
The 2 in ICU 2 given AZ, and one SP, the most recently vaccinated got their last shot 2 months ago, the earliest got it 3 months ago. All 3 work together in the same company.
Reduced risk of transmission? Ok, if you say so.
Reduced risk of severe disease and needing hospitalization. Mhmm, ok.
Please forgive my skepticism.
EDIT
Forgot to mention
The company only has 8 employees, and all but 1 are vaccinated.
So, that's almost 50% of their fully vaccinated workforce that contracted the disease, and 100% of those who did are having severe symptoms.
What are the odds of this.
Feel free to do the math yourself
![]()
![]()
![]()
OH MY GOD! Fully vaccinated people can get Covid?
No details on what type of work
Whether protocols that are still supposed to be followed were.
All with comorbidities, so their being in ICU shouldn't be a surprise.