TriniTuner.com | Latest Event:
Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
wing wrote:Bluefete and others, I'm sure you have realised by now that every attempt at a discussion ends up being an exchange of insults. Let them and those like them beat up among themselves. Let's focus our attention on eradication of the threat to the next generation.
maj. tom wrote:Is that what dissociative identity disorder really is? They can switch personalities at will whenever?
butttt...sooo....you are saying.....it's really demon possession......okkkkkk. *faceplam* this is the intellectual level of this Trinituner "discussion."
Guys is being left handed a mental illness? Some people I know may need to be psychiatrically medicated.
maj. tom wrote:But if this "threat" occurs randomly genetically at 7 to 10% in every generation in every population, how do you eradicate this threat? What are your plans of eradication?
It's ok to be an online nazi in 2023. And it's ok to feel insulted if you're a said loser nazi who is openly expressing these ideas on a forum.
SuperiorMan wrote:SuperiorMan wrote:Guys what is a woman?
Notice is how only bluefete answer this.
adnj wrote:Transgender people should definitely take the advice offered in this thread to avoid the miserable and lackluster lives that are waiting for them if they don't. /s
bluefete wrote:SuperiorMan wrote:SuperiorMan wrote:Guys what is a woman?
Notice is how only bluefete answer this.
They have no clue how to answer this because they are so involved in marginalising the word "woman."
paid_influencer wrote:i can see why bluefete might have trouble finding alternate links. the mass media is very edited by design. I was looking to see if there was any news on the Ghana law and on the first page for a google of "ghana gay" has no western media outlets except for a cnn article curiously headlined "Ghana’s president softens country’s stance on draconian anti-LGBTQ bill as Kamala Harris visits"
if that is what the softened stance is, what was the worse version
bluefete wrote:Most if not all of these people are looking for attention. The more outrageous they behave, the greater the attention they get from the media.adnj wrote:Transgender people should definitely take the advice offered in this thread to avoid the miserable and lackluster lives that are waiting for them if they don't. /s
maj. tom wrote:But if this "threat" occurs randomly genetically at 7 to 10% in every generation in every population, how do you eradicate this threat? What are your plans of eradication?
It's ok to be an online nazi in 2023. And it's ok to feel insulted if you're a said loser nazi who is openly expressing these ideas on a forum.
Only 3%? You should be able to see that you have invalidated every argument against LGBTQ recognition on this thread.redmanjp wrote:maj. tom wrote:But if this "threat" occurs randomly genetically at 7 to 10% in every generation in every population, how do you eradicate this threat? What are your plans of eradication?
It's ok to be an online nazi in 2023. And it's ok to feel insulted if you're a said loser nazi who is openly expressing these ideas on a forum.
It's more like 3%. Only GenZs make it seem like more because they are just confused and indoctrinated. Just ask the older generations as in that poll done just last year.
maj. tom wrote:Deflection? You mean like just now like how they shift from talking about XX and XY chromosomes to define human gender when it was explained that it's much more complicated than that (as if there wasn't context to that), there was a shift to one member who always feels insulted when he talk a set of sheit about perverse sin and some weird tangent about future bestiality now start talking about "eradication of the threat", now it shift to define woman.
But if there is a statement how there is now a realization that persons can identify as female in modern society and there seems to be more to the traditional identity of woman, what will the next shift will be? How they really fear that they may accidentally find a trans-woman attractive by mistake and then feel disgusted after? If you see traditional woman and are attracted to her vs. if you are attracted to the appearance of a trans-woman what is the difference to you? Your wives and girlfriends have this issue in your lives that it's so important to define someone else's sexuality like this? How is this important to your personal life what is a woman? This comes up in your personal relationships? How did you define it? Did the criteria satisfy you? Then why you even care or worrying about other people bonus holes for?
I am interested in this eradication theory. How did that come to be? It is very interesting to me to witness a debate regarding what words mean and how words are used. In this particular instance, I don't see how a very narrow understanding of the actual meaning of the word "woman" changes into something new when the something new is an existing definition of the term.bluefete wrote:maj. tom wrote:Deflection? You mean like just now like how they shift from talking about XX and XY chromosomes to define human gender when it was explained that it's much more complicated than that (as if there wasn't context to that), there was a shift to one member who always feels insulted when he talk a set of sheit about perverse sin and some weird tangent about future bestiality now start talking about "eradication of the threat", now it shift to define woman.
But if there is a statement how there is now a realization that persons can identify as female in modern society and there seems to be more to the traditional identity of woman, what will the next shift will be? How they really fear that they may accidentally find a trans-woman attractive by mistake and then feel disgusted after? If you see traditional woman and are attracted to her vs. if you are attracted to the appearance of a trans-woman what is the difference to you? Your wives and girlfriends have this issue in your lives that it's so important to define someone else's sexuality like this? How is this important to your personal life what is a woman? This comes up in your personal relationships? How did you define it? Did the criteria satisfy you? Then why you even care or worrying about other people bonus holes for?
You are conflating again. The current "shift" is to obliterate the term woman and replace it with something that takes away the unique identity of what it means to be female / woman.
In other words, a hard-back man born without a uterus but masquerading as a woman, can breastfeed a baby.
Notice that no effort is being made to redefine the word "man".
adnj wrote:I am really interested in this eradication theory. How did that come to be? It is really interesting to me to witness a debate regarding what words mean and how words are used. In this particular instance, I don't see how a very narrow understanding of the actual meaning of the word "woman" changes into something new when the something new is an existing definition of the term.bluefete wrote:maj. tom wrote:Deflection? You mean like just now like how they shift from talking about XX and XY chromosomes to define human gender when it was explained that it's much more complicated than that (as if there wasn't context to that), there was a shift to one member who always feels insulted when he talk a set of sheit about perverse sin and some weird tangent about future bestiality now start talking about "eradication of the threat", now it shift to define woman.
But if there is a statement how there is now a realization that persons can identify as female in modern society and there seems to be more to the traditional identity of woman, what will the next shift will be? How they really fear that they may accidentally find a trans-woman attractive by mistake and then feel disgusted after? If you see traditional woman and are attracted to her vs. if you are attracted to the appearance of a trans-woman what is the difference to you? Your wives and girlfriends have this issue in your lives that it's so important to define someone else's sexuality like this? How is this important to your personal life what is a woman? This comes up in your personal relationships? How did you define it? Did the criteria satisfy you? Then why you even care or worrying about other people bonus holes for?
You are conflating again. The current "shift" is to obliterate the term woman and replace it with something that takes away the unique identity of what it means to be female / woman.
In other words, a hard-back man born without a uterus but masquerading as a woman, can breastfeed a baby.
Notice that no effort is being made to redefine the word "man".
If we look at conflating, the key is the mash-up between sex and gender. Some of you people simply don't see what each word actually means and seem to be so very upset when some of these words are used in ways that you don't agree with.
alfa wrote:adnj wrote:I am really interested in this eradication theory. How did that come to be? It is really interesting to me to witness a debate regarding what words mean and how words are used. In this particular instance, I don't see how a very narrow understanding of the actual meaning of the word "woman" changes into something new when the something new is an existing definition of the term.bluefete wrote:maj. tom wrote:Deflection? You mean like just now like how they shift from talking about XX and XY chromosomes to define human gender when it was explained that it's much more complicated than that (as if there wasn't context to that), there was a shift to one member who always feels insulted when he talk a set of sheit about perverse sin and some weird tangent about future bestiality now start talking about "eradication of the threat", now it shift to define woman.
But if there is a statement how there is now a realization that persons can identify as female in modern society and there seems to be more to the traditional identity of woman, what will the next shift will be? How they really fear that they may accidentally find a trans-woman attractive by mistake and then feel disgusted after? If you see traditional woman and are attracted to her vs. if you are attracted to the appearance of a trans-woman what is the difference to you? Your wives and girlfriends have this issue in your lives that it's so important to define someone else's sexuality like this? How is this important to your personal life what is a woman? This comes up in your personal relationships? How did you define it? Did the criteria satisfy you? Then why you even care or worrying about other people bonus holes for?
You are conflating again. The current "shift" is to obliterate the term woman and replace it with something that takes away the unique identity of what it means to be female / woman.
In other words, a hard-back man born without a uterus but masquerading as a woman, can breastfeed a baby.
Notice that no effort is being made to redefine the word "man".
If we look at conflating, the key is the mash-up between sex and gender. Some of you people simply don't see what each word actually means and seem to be so very upset when some of these words are used in ways that you don't agree with.
And that's exactly the kind of thing people don't want their kids exposed to and that's their right. If you want to believe there's a difference that's cool but don't expect mature grown arse adults to know or care. Recently in work we were having a light banter about gender identity and some people had no idea what that meant and it's safe to assume they will never refer to anyone by any pronoun. So the new age alphabet group can't force this idealogy on just anyone.
While we're on the topic what's the deal with using the term 'people who are pregnant'? And before you or the "wont someone please think of the children' guy go on a lecture with graphs and molecular biology notes, it was a rethorical question
paid_influencer wrote:last night I was watching Last Of Us on HBO and there was a completely unnecessary homosexual plot diversion for 3/4 of the episode and I think I agree w bluefete now
The_Honourable wrote:paid_influencer wrote:last night I was watching Last Of Us on HBO and there was a completely unnecessary homosexual plot diversion for 3/4 of the episode and I think I agree w bluefete now
It's going on heavy for some time now, watching a show and some lgbtq plot or sex scene pops up. What use to happen was that viewers would just skip by fast forward because you figured out what the scene was building and leading into but now, it comes out of left field blindsiding the viewer.
maj. tom wrote:Right well bluefete and company , reality is that the world is changing and you are getting left behind. That's your business. When the children of today grow up to be adults and lead society, they all won't be proud to be dumb and clueless or boast about their ignorance and how they have more common sense than facing reality with knowledge. They'll be better adults and accept the changes that are happening and welcome and include the same parts of society that your group fears and hates so much. Children today have more access to education, technology and social interaction and a world view than ever before. Unless you are trying to keep children down and create a anti-intellectual cult of them to not explore curiosity and observe the world.
And there's nothing you can do about it from your grave.
maj. tom wrote:Right well bluefete and company , reality is that the world is changing and you are getting left behind. That's your business. When the children of today grow up to be adults and lead society, they all won't be proud to be dumb and clueless or boast about their ignorance and how they have more common sense than facing reality with knowledge. They'll be better adults and accept the changes that are happening and welcome and include the same parts of society that your group fears and hates so much. Children today have more access to education, technology and social interaction and a world view than ever before. Unless you are trying to keep children down and create a anti-intellectual cult of them to not explore curiosity and observe the world.
And there's nothing you can do about it from your grave.
alfa wrote:maj. tom wrote:Right well bluefete and company , reality is that the world is changing and you are getting left behind. That's your business. When the children of today grow up to be adults and lead society, they all won't be proud to be dumb and clueless or boast about their ignorance and how they have more common sense than facing reality with knowledge. They'll be better adults and accept the changes that are happening and welcome and include the same parts of society that your group fears and hates so much. Children today have more access to education, technology and social interaction and a world view than ever before. Unless you are trying to keep children down and create a anti-intellectual cult of them to not explore curiosity and observe the world.
And there's nothing you can do about it from your grave.
We're probably also the last generation that can sucessfully own a house and don't need a masters to fry chicken so yeah I'm doing good in the back. As to the hate part I don't think anyone mentioned "hating" these people or their lifestyle in the 24 pages thus far, so you're throwing a strawman argument again to solicit an emotional reaction. No one I know ever had a hate for alphabet people even in the less tolerant decades. Growing up we all heard urban legends about homosexuals and would occasionally see a guy who it was alledgedly 'was caught with a man when he was young'. We'd have a snicker and be on our merry way and that was it. This ain't Jamaica, it's a haven for alphabeters if you ask me.
Fear however yes, as an adult I'm afraid to even google what some of these letters stand for in the acronym beyond LGBT, why the hell will any sane thinking person then allow their child to be taught this?
Awaiting the insults....bluefete wrote:alfa wrote:maj. tom wrote:Right well bluefete and company , reality is that the world is changing and you are getting left behind. That's your business. When the children of today grow up to be adults and lead society, they all won't be proud to be dumb and clueless or boast about their ignorance and how they have more common sense than facing reality with knowledge. They'll be better adults and accept the changes that are happening and welcome and include the same parts of society that your group fears and hates so much. Children today have more access to education, technology and social interaction and a world view than ever before. Unless you are trying to keep children down and create a anti-intellectual cult of them to not explore curiosity and observe the world.
And there's nothing you can do about it from your grave.
We're probably also the last generation that can sucessfully own a house and don't need a masters to fry chicken so yeah I'm doing good in the back. As to the hate part I don't think anyone mentioned "hating" these people or their lifestyle in the 24 pages thus far, so you're throwing a strawman argument again to solicit an emotional reaction. No one I know ever had a hate for alphabet people even in the less tolerant decades. Growing up we all heard urban legends about homosexuals and would occasionally see a guy who it was alledgedly 'was caught with a man when he was young'. We'd have a snicker and be on our merry way and that was it. This ain't Jamaica, it's a haven for alphabeters if you ask me.
Fear however yes, as an adult I'm afraid to even google what some of these letters stand for in the acronym beyond LGBT, why the hell will any sane thinking person then allow their child to be taught this?
Very well said!
bluefete wrote:maj. tom wrote:Right well bluefete and company , reality is that the world is changing and you are getting left behind. That's your business. When the children of today grow up to be adults and lead society, they all won't be proud to be dumb and clueless or boast about their ignorance and how they have more common sense than facing reality with knowledge. They'll be better adults and accept the changes that are happening and welcome and include the same parts of society that your group fears and hates so much. Children today have more access to education, technology and social interaction and a world view than ever before. Unless you are trying to keep children down and create a anti-intellectual cult of them to not explore curiosity and observe the world.
And there's nothing you can do about it from your grave.
The world is always changing. It has changed significantly from when I was born to now. One does not always have to agree with the changes but that is the nature of life. Nothing is static.
However, that does not mean that I must just lie down and accept rubbish thrown into my open mind. People who are afraid to speak out when society is going in the wrong direction might as well just lay down and die.
As long as I live, there are some things I will never accept maj.tom. Let me repeat - a hard back man chopping off his penis because he thinks he is a woman needs to see a PSYCHIATRIST!
If you see that action as he being his authentic self - so be it.
As much as you accept the trans-agenda being aimed at children, you will have no problem with the legalisation of humans having sex with animals.
wing wrote:Awaiting the insults....bluefete wrote:alfa wrote:maj. tom wrote:Right well bluefete and company , reality is that the world is changing and you are getting left behind. That's your business. When the children of today grow up to be adults and lead society, they all won't be proud to be dumb and clueless or boast about their ignorance and how they have more common sense than facing reality with knowledge. They'll be better adults and accept the changes that are happening and welcome and include the same parts of society that your group fears and hates so much. Children today have more access to education, technology and social interaction and a world view than ever before. Unless you are trying to keep children down and create a anti-intellectual cult of them to not explore curiosity and observe the world.
And there's nothing you can do about it from your grave.
We're probably also the last generation that can sucessfully own a house and don't need a masters to fry chicken so yeah I'm doing good in the back. As to the hate part I don't think anyone mentioned "hating" these people or their lifestyle in the 24 pages thus far, so you're throwing a strawman argument again to solicit an emotional reaction. No one I know ever had a hate for alphabet people even in the less tolerant decades. Growing up we all heard urban legends about homosexuals and would occasionally see a guy who it was alledgedly 'was caught with a man when he was young'. We'd have a snicker and be on our merry way and that was it. This ain't Jamaica, it's a haven for alphabeters if you ask me.
Fear however yes, as an adult I'm afraid to even google what some of these letters stand for in the acronym beyond LGBT, why the hell will any sane thinking person then allow their child to be taught this?
Very well said!
in the acronym beyond LGBT, why the hell will any sane thinking person then allow their child to be taught this?
adnj wrote:bluefete wrote:maj. tom wrote:Right well bluefete and company , reality is that the world is changing and you are getting left behind. That's your business. When the children of today grow up to be adults and lead society, they all won't be proud to be dumb and clueless or boast about their ignorance and how they have more common sense than facing reality with knowledge. They'll be better adults and accept the changes that are happening and welcome and include the same parts of society that your group fears and hates so much. Children today have more access to education, technology and social interaction and a world view than ever before. Unless you are trying to keep children down and create a anti-intellectual cult of them to not explore curiosity and observe the world.
And there's nothing you can do about it from your grave.
The world is always changing. It has changed significantly from when I was born to now. One does not always have to agree with the changes but that is the nature of life. Nothing is static.
However, that does not mean that I must just lie down and accept rubbish thrown into my open mind. People who are afraid to speak out when society is going in the wrong direction might as well just lay down and die.
As long as I live, there are some things I will never accept maj.tom. Let me repeat - a hard back man chopping off his penis because he thinks he is a woman needs to see a PSYCHIATRIST!
If you see that action as he being his authentic self - so be it.
As much as you accept the trans-agenda being aimed at children, you will have no problem with the legalisation of humans having sex with animals.
IIRC bestiality is legal in four US states.
Bestiality was also legal in Chile, Cuba, Hungary, Japan, the Philippines, Romania, and Russia - but same-sex marriage was not.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 68 guests
