Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
If you do become ill, take fluoxetine or fluvoxamine instead.redmanjp wrote:At what stage were they given it? When they deteriorated or early on as symptoms developed?
Time for you to get off the hammock and run your study. Zinc may help - but there is nothing that has been published that has been able to show clinical usefulness.meccalli wrote:Another study testing the effectiveness of a curing agent on epoxy without resin lol. The pathophysiological rationale for use of ivermectin is within the first 7 days of infection as ionophore that conveys zinc intracellularly to block the SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, which is the core enzyme of the virus replication. Other ionophores that were used by early treatment practitioners were quercetin, HCQ, and thymoquinone, dithymoquinone, or thymohydroquinone containing extracts such as from nigella sativa.
Zn2+ Inhibits Coronavirus and Arterivirus RNA Polymerase Activity In Vitro and Zinc Ionophores Block the Replication of These Viruses in Cell Culture
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2973827/
adnj wrote:ou do have background and funding sufficient to run a study, don't you?
meccalli wrote:adnj wrote:ou do have background and funding sufficient to run a study, don't you?
It's ironic how it was the early treatment proponents who actually gave a damn about it, Misinformation spreader Steve kirsch started and funded the Covid-19 Early Treatment Fund (CETF) that identified not only ivermectin for early treatment but fluvoxamine as useful as the disease progressed.
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-release ... 42164.html
This I agree with.I am sure a lot of people who tested positive for a home test did not report itmatr1x wrote:The decrease in numbers is purely because they are testing less
adnj wrote:UK Covid infections climb by a million in a week
Swab tests suggest about one in every 16 people is infected, as the contagious Omicron variant BA.2 continues to spread.
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-60872687
adnj wrote:Evidence grows that vaccines lower the risk of getting long COVID
March 24, 2022
The chance of even a mild case of COVID-19 turning into a long-term, debilitating medical condition is one of the greatest fears of Americans trying to navigate the pandemic, which is again taking a turn as new data show the BA.2 subvariant is taking hold in the U.S.
Unfortunately, the only sure way to avoid long COVID is not to catch the virus in the first place.
But there is now a growing body of research that's offering at least some reassurance for those who do end up getting infected — being fully vaccinated seems to substantially cut the risk of later developing the persistent symptoms that characterize long COVID.
While many of the findings are still preliminary, the handful of studies that have emerged in the past half year are telling a relatively consistent story.
"It may not eradicate the symptoms of long COVID, but the protective effect seems to be very strong," says epidemiology professor Michael Edelstein, of Bar-Ilan University in Israel, who's studying long COVID.
Edelstein's study was one of those included in a recent analysis of the evidence on long COVID and vaccination done by the UK Health Security Agency. That review found vaccinated people tend to have lower rates of long COVID after an infection than those who are unvaccinated.
There's a running list of theories about why people get long COVID. Permanent tissue damage from the infection, injury to blood vessels and the development of microclots, a lingering viral reservoir in parts of the body, or an autoimmune condition are some of the ideas being explored in the research.
But even without a clear sense of what's exactly driving long COVID, there's good reason to believe that vaccines would help guard against the condition, says Dr. Steven Deeks, a professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco.
There's overwhelming evidence that someone who's vaccinated has less virus in their body during an infection, he says, "so it would make great sense that the amount of virus-related complications over time would also be lower."
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-sho ... d-vaccines
hover11 wrote:BREAKING: FDA authorizes second round of booster shots for everyone over the age of 50—kicking off the regulatory process for shots to likely be available in pharmacies sometime this week. https://abcn.ws/3uCrRdZ
Roll up those sleeves
Red, I blame you and adnj and st7 and others who obviously fall for the trolls in here and encourage their antivax, Qanon, conspiracy theory, anti science etc. Just ignore them, they are beyond convincing.redmanjp wrote:hover11 wrote:BREAKING: FDA authorizes second round of booster shots for everyone over the age of 50—kicking off the regulatory process for shots to likely be available in pharmacies sometime this week. https://abcn.ws/3uCrRdZ
Roll up those sleeves
over 50. yuh eh want yuh fadder who have pressure and sugar to get it?
Most will die out in 70 yearsstev wrote:any estimated time until the unvaccinated die out? about 6 years?
can't remember the last study I read...probably late 2020 estimation...any updates?
Effect of Early Treatment with Ivermectin among Patients with Covid-19
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The efficacy of ivermectin in preventing hospitalization or extended observation in an emergency setting among outpatients with acutely symptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), the disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is unclear.
METHODS
We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, adaptive platform trial involving symptomatic SARS-CoV-2–positive adults recruited from 12 public health clinics in Brazil. Patients who had had symptoms of Covid-19 for up to 7 days and had at least one risk factor for disease progression were randomly assigned to receive ivermectin (400 μg per kilogram of body weight) once daily for 3 days or placebo. (The trial also involved other interventions that are not reported here.) The primary composite outcome was hospitalization due to Covid-19 within 28 days after randomization or an emergency department visit due to clinical worsening of Covid-19 (defined as the participant remaining under observation for >6 hours) within 28 days after randomization.
RESULTS
A total of 3515 patients were randomly assigned to receive ivermectin (679 patients), placebo (679), or another intervention (2157). Overall, 100 patients (14.7%) in the ivermectin group had a primary-outcome event, as compared with 111 (16.3%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.90; 95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.70 to 1.16). Of the 211 primary-outcome events, 171 (81.0%) were hospital admissions. Findings were similar to the primary analysis in a modified intention-to-treat analysis that included only patients who received at least one dose of ivermectin or placebo (relative risk, 0.89; 95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.69 to 1.15) and in a per-protocol analysis that included only patients who reported 100% adherence to the assigned regimen (relative risk, 0.94; 95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.67 to 1.35). There were no significant effects of ivermectin use on secondary outcomes or adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS
Treatment with ivermectin did not result in a lower incidence of medical admission to a hospital due to progression of Covid-19 or of prolonged emergency department observation among outpatients with an early diagnosis of Covid-19. (Funded by FastGrants and the Rainwater Charitable Foundation; TOGETHER ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04727424. opens in new tab.)
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2115869
timelapse wrote:That study not real ADNJ.In before Hover.lol
Take yuh Ivermectin and go in yuh bed nahhover11 wrote:As if the jabs and circuit-breaker lockdowns weren’t enough but no..there’ll still be those that roll up their sleeves for a 4th, 5th and 6th jab even after having the virus they’re jabbed against. Honestly I cannot believe what I’m witnessing
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], jeevdude199 and 47 guests