Postby worksux101 » January 10th, 2010, 11:10 pm
Man City now is essentially what Chelsea were 6 years ago...the bullies of the trasnfer market...the difference is that they could turn that into success for 2 years and create a pedigree, while City are still unable to do that...
Imho, its because City are buying players for being good rather than for fitting a system...Mourinho knew what he wanted and bought around it...Hughes bought and then tried to fit...
Also, Chelsea had the big advantage of a shitty Liverpool, an aging Arsenal and a rebuilding United...City sorta has the same with a young Arsenal, a shitty Liverpool, an aging Chelsea and again a rebuilding United...however, they can't take advantage of it in an increasingly competitive league...
Throw Aston Villa or Spurs into the UCL and they'll prolly beat half the teams left in there...
With regard to the financial aspect...equal2zero is right...you build a succesful club that earns enough revenue through attracting fans to tickets and merchandising as well as trophies and the reward that comes with it...that in turn takes care of the large wages and trsanfer fees etc...
Its how United have survived with all the debt...they earn enough money to cover it, and are the only big club in Europe i think that pays less than 50% of their revenue in players' salaries...