Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Redman wrote:[quote="sam1978"]That is the method Habit 7 always use to scare people into not opposing him. I pointed it out before. He never just argue his point. Always has to be a personal attack or shine remark. If you look at it , Rowley , Hinds , Alwari all of them do the same thing. As for elec2020, he is just a mimic but hasn't learned the trade yet. He is always carrying on like a little .... and calling out users for what he perceives to be wrong in his eyes , I don't know if he sees his name in green or something. Like they alone have opinions and nobody must contradict them.[/quote]
Really?
As soon as I post an opinion the labels and insults start..not a discussion...not a counter argument or a link to show that I'm wrong.
I would say check history of any of the major discussions....and see that there is a group that starts with killing the messenger.Im not the only one.
And it is not Habit7's method to do that.
Of course if we respond in kind the victim card comes out.
I ask you to post where Habit elec or I start the personality fight.[/quote]
Wraith King wrote:Redman wrote:sam1978 wrote:That is the method Habit 7 always use to scare people into not opposing him. I pointed it out before. He never just argue his point. Always has to be a personal attack or shine remark. If you look at it , Rowley , Hinds , Alwari all of them do the same thing. As for elec2020, he is just a mimic but hasn't learned the trade yet. He is always carrying on like a little .... and calling out users for what he perceives to be wrong in his eyes , I don't know if he sees his name in green or something. Like they alone have opinions and nobody must contradict them.
Really?
As soon as I post an opinion the labels and insults start..not a discussion...not a counter argument or a link to show that I'm wrong.
I would say check history of any of the major discussions....and see that there is a group that starts with killing the messenger.Im not the only one.
And it is not Habit7's method to do that.
Of course if we respond in kind the victim card comes out.
I ask you to post where Habit elec or I start the personality fight.
Habit7 has been dishonest and when called out he tried to deflect by calling the other person a liar and accused multiple persons of being Zoom. He tries to silence other users by bullying tactics primarily and when that doesn't work he tries to create a false picture of victimhood.
Kickstart wrote:So from reading this thread poster Habit 7 is the worst tuner
His points most times are not Valid and lots of tuners call him out on it. Anything he presents are far from the truth. He post stuff that are not related while jumping from one point to the other non issue. He can't be taken real or his article as creditable. It's like he's forcing people to accept what he's posted as truth.Redman wrote:Kk
i Appreciate your response.
Ive only seen Habit7 retaliate after posting a point and then the usual suspects whine.
And the pattern is consistent and systemic.
Wraith King wrote:Redman wrote:[quote="sam1978"]That is the method Habit 7 always use to scare people into not opposing him. I pointed it out before. He never just argue his point. Always has to be a personal attack or shine remark. If you look at it , Rowley , Hinds , Alwari all of them do the same thing. As for elec2020, he is just a mimic but hasn't learned the trade yet. He is always carrying on like a little .... and calling out users for what he perceives to be wrong in his eyes , I don't know if he sees his name in green or something. Like they alone have opinions and nobody must contradict them.[/quote]
Really?
As soon as I post an opinion the labels and insults start..not a discussion...not a counter argument or a link to show that I'm wrong.
I would say check history of any of the major discussions....and see that there is a group that starts with killing the messenger.Im not the only one.
And it is not Habit7's method to do that.
Of course if we respond in kind the victim card comes out.
I ask you to post where Habit elec or I start the personality fight.[/quote][/quote]
Habit7 has been dishonest and when called out he tried to deflect by calling the other person a liar and accused multiple persons of being Zoom. He tries to silence other users by bullying tactics primarily and when that doesn't work he tries to create a false picture of victimhood.[/quote]
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8764715/How-China-poured-billions-Caribbean.htmlRedman wrote:Kickstart wrote:So from reading this thread poster Habit 7 is the worst tuner
This logic is consistent with your Chinese colonisation bit.
Kickstart wrote:His points most times are not Valid and lots of tuners call him out on it. Anything he presents are far from the truth. He post stuff that are not related while jumping from one point to the other non issue. He can't be taken real or his article as creditable. It's like he's forcing people to accept what he's posted as truth.Redman wrote:Kk
i Appreciate your response.
Ive only seen Habit7 retaliate after posting a point and then the usual suspects whine.
And the pattern is consistent and systemic.
When he is called out on his inaccuracies he then jumps and shift blames. Then he tries the age old PNM mantra to blame UNC and yes he does try to bully other posters. I am sure he is a wife beater and most likely got tap up in school.
Habit7 wrote:Wraith King wrote:Redman wrote:sam1978 wrote:That is the method Habit 7 always use to scare people into not opposing him. I pointed it out before. He never just argue his point. Always has to be a personal attack or shine remark. If you look at it , Rowley , Hinds , Alwari all of them do the same thing. As for elec2020, he is just a mimic but hasn't learned the trade yet. He is always carrying on like a little .... and calling out users for what he perceives to be wrong in his eyes , I don't know if he sees his name in green or something. Like they alone have opinions and nobody must contradict them.
Really?
As soon as I post an opinion the labels and insults start..not a discussion...not a counter argument or a link to show that I'm wrong.
I would say check history of any of the major discussions....and see that there is a group that starts with killing the messenger.Im not the only one.
And it is not Habit7's method to do that.
Of course if we respond in kind the victim card comes out.
I ask you to post where Habit elec or I start the personality fight.
Habit7 has been dishonest and when called out he tried to deflect by calling the other person a liar and accused multiple persons of being Zoom. He tries to silence other users by bullying tactics primarily and when that doesn't work he tries to create a false picture of victimhood.
1. If you lie about something, that makes you a liar. That is a statement of fact, not an ad hominem.
2. I never accused multiple persons of being Zoom only Kickstart, and I did it with evidence. So you are lying...again
3. The only way I can bully or try to silence anyone is by laying out my position with facts.
4. The only person claiming victimhood is the one who is saying I am bullying and trying to silence them by contradicting them with facts.
It is funny how after only 8days on tuner you already have fully formed opinions of individuals.
Kickstart wrote:His points most times are not Valid and lots of tuners call him out on it. Anything he presents are far from the truth. He post stuff that are not related while jumping from one point to the other non issue. He can't be taken real or his article as creditable. It's like he's forcing people to accept what he's posted as truth.Redman wrote:Kk
i Appreciate your response.
Ive only seen Habit7 retaliate after posting a point and then the usual suspects whine.
And the pattern is consistent and systemic.
When he is called out on his inaccuracies he then jumps and shift blames. Then he tries the age old PNM mantra to blame UNC and yes he does try to bully other posters. I am sure he is a wife beater and most likely got tap up in school.
Redman wrote:Wraith King wrote:Redman wrote:[quote="sam1978"]That is the method Habit 7 always use to scare people into not opposing him. I pointed it out before. He never just argue his point. Always has to be a personal attack or shine remark. If you look at it , Rowley , Hinds , Alwari all of them do the same thing. As for elec2020, he is just a mimic but hasn't learned the trade yet. He is always carrying on like a little .... and calling out users for what he perceives to be wrong in his eyes , I don't know if he sees his name in green or something. Like they alone have opinions and nobody must contradict them.[/quote]
Really?
As soon as I post an opinion the labels and insults start..not a discussion...not a counter argument or a link to show that I'm wrong.
I would say check history of any of the major discussions....and see that there is a group that starts with killing the messenger.Im not the only one.
And it is not Habit7's method to do that.
Of course if we respond in kind the victim card comes out.
I ask you to post where Habit elec or I start the personality fight.[/quote][/quote]
Habit7 has been dishonest and when called out he tried to deflect by calling the other person a liar and accused multiple persons of being Zoom. He tries to silence other users by bullying tactics primarily and when that doesn't work he tries to create a false picture of victimhood.[/quote][/quote][/quote]
So it should be easy to find the post/thread that supports your claim.[/quote]
Habit7 wrote:Kickstart wrote:His points most times are not Valid and lots of tuners call him out on it. Anything he presents are far from the truth. He post stuff that are not related while jumping from one point to the other non issue. He can't be taken real or his article as creditable. It's like he's forcing people to accept what he's posted as truth.Redman wrote:Kk
i Appreciate your response.
Ive only seen Habit7 retaliate after posting a point and then the usual suspects whine.
And the pattern is consistent and systemic.
When he is called out on his inaccuracies he then jumps and shift blames. Then he tries the age old PNM mantra to blame UNC and yes he does try to bully other posters. I am sure he is a wife beater and most likely got tap up in school.
If this isn't classic ZR, I don't know what is.
Phone Surgeon wrote:i eh read this whole page but
effectic design was the worst no matter what
he like he had some gay porn fixation and use to threaten to rape yuh with a spoon when yuh piss him off
it had megadoc as well...and his bible thumping
a time he find my phone number on a advertisement and call me to talk about jesus and why i dont accept god in my life.....
some crazy fawkers here
Kickstart wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8764715/How-China-poured-billions-Caribbean.htmlRedman wrote:Kickstart wrote:So from reading this thread poster Habit 7 is the worst tuner
This logic is consistent with your Chinese colonisation bit.
Redman wrote:Kickstart wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8764715/How-China-poured-billions-Caribbean.htmlRedman wrote:Kickstart wrote:So from reading this thread poster Habit 7 is the worst tuner
This logic is consistent with your Chinese colonisation bit.
Seems a fluff piece about the Queen.
Making investments into the region is called FDI by the region.
I think FDI peaked at north 210 B in 2011/12 into LATAM and the Carib.
So how does 1200 acres and 1.2B invested since 2005 equate to colonisation?
China has been making investments in the region for decades.
Give an inch and then take an entire country . Baby steps to owning a countryRedman wrote:Kickstart wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8764715/How-China-poured-billions-Caribbean.htmlRedman wrote:Kickstart wrote:So from reading this thread poster Habit 7 is the worst tuner
This logic is consistent with your Chinese colonisation bit.
Seems a fluff piece about the Queen.
Making investments into the region is called FDI by the region.
I think FDI peaked at north 210 B in 2011/12 into LATAM and the Carib.
So how does 1200 acres and 1.2B invested since 2005 equate to colonisation?
China has been making investments in the region for decades.
Dizzy28 wrote:Officially there is no FDI from China in Trinidad. Unofficially there probably is (quite a lot of what the Chinese do here cannot be classified as FDI anyhows)
Can be confirmed by the Statistics Department of the Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago.
Be very cautious of any publications coming from UWI. They can be easily brought out.Habit7 wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:Officially there is no FDI from China in Trinidad. Unofficially there probably is (quite a lot of what the Chinese do here cannot be classified as FDI anyhows)
Can be confirmed by the Statistics Department of the Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago.
IADB says otherwise
https://publications.iadb.org/publicati ... spects.pdf
Kickstart wrote:Be very cautious of any publications coming from UWI. They can be easily brought out.Habit7 wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:Officially there is no FDI from China in Trinidad. Unofficially there probably is (quite a lot of what the Chinese do here cannot be classified as FDI anyhows)
Can be confirmed by the Statistics Department of the Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago.
IADB says otherwise
https://publications.iadb.org/publicati ... spects.pdf
I honestly feel Dohplaydat and Redress is the same person.aaron17 wrote:Imagine you create two accounts ..and you arguing with urself
Phone Surgeon wrote:i eh read this whole page but
effectic design was the worst no matter what
he like he had some gay porn fixation and use to threaten to rape yuh with a spoon when yuh piss him off
it had megadoc as well...and his bible thumping
a time he find my phone number on a advertisement and call me to talk about jesus and why i dont accept god in my life.....
some crazy fawkers here
mero wrote:I honestly feel Dohplaydat and Redress is the same person.aaron17 wrote:Imagine you create two accounts ..and you arguing with urself
Same overdrawn out over feel dey smart responses.alwyss the need to let every one they went to school abroad In "first world countries"
Can't put anything past Daran too. Not the first time he's been caught replying to himself
Real lonely ppl on 2nr.
Others just do it cuz they think strength in numbers make their stupid point less stupid
Habit7 wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:Officially there is no FDI from China in Trinidad. Unofficially there probably is (quite a lot of what the Chinese do here cannot be classified as FDI anyhows)
Can be confirmed by the Statistics Department of the Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago.
IADB says otherwise
https://publications.iadb.org/publicati ... spects.pdf
Habit7 wrote:Kickstart wrote:Be very cautious of any publications coming from UWI. They can be easily brought out.Habit7 wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:Officially there is no FDI from China in Trinidad. Unofficially there probably is (quite a lot of what the Chinese do here cannot be classified as FDI anyhows)
Can be confirmed by the Statistics Department of the Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago.
IADB says otherwise
https://publications.iadb.org/publicati ... spects.pdf
This is not UWI, this is the IDB based in Washington DC
Kickstart wrote:Habit7 wrote:Kickstart wrote:Be very cautious of any publications coming from UWI. They can be easily brought out.Habit7 wrote:Dizzy28 wrote:Officially there is no FDI from China in Trinidad. Unofficially there probably is (quite a lot of what the Chinese do here cannot be classified as FDI anyhows)
Can be confirmed by the Statistics Department of the Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago.
IADB says otherwise
https://publications.iadb.org/publicati ... spects.pdf
This is not UWI, this is the IDB based in Washington DC
Who wrote the article?
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot], pugboy and 263 guests