Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
So the logic is businessmen shouldn't be subjected to taxes because they will inflate their prices?shake d livin wake d dead wrote:PariaMan wrote:She was hgonna implement the correct way starting with industrial and commercial first
Showing care for the small man
Commercial people would have just passed on that cost to the consumers.... Shrugs shoulders
hover11 wrote:So the logic is businessmen shouldn't be subjected to taxes because they will inflate their prices?shake d livin wake d dead wrote:PariaMan wrote:She was hgonna implement the correct way starting with industrial and commercial first
Showing care for the small man
Commercial people would have just passed on that cost to the consumers.... Shrugs shoulders
She was going to tax commercial first? But was elected by singing axe the tax? Are you believing politicians promises? They serve the interests of the financiers, thought you might have forgotten.PariaMan wrote:She was hgonna implement the correct way starting with industrial and commercial first
Showing care for the small man
She promised to the electorate that her government would axe the tax. She did not. Another poster above says that she was in fact going to implement tax on commercial, then residential. Does axe mean implement?paid_influencer wrote:kamla did not implement any form of property tax in her term
PariaMan wrote:Makes sense lol. Anyone with a business exempt from tax because they will simply pass it on to customers. Include all land lords too so rent can stay low
This is 2024wing wrote:She promised to the electorate that her government would axe the tax. She did not. Another poster above says that she was in fact going to implement tax on commercial, then residential. Does axe mean implement?paid_influencer wrote:kamla did not implement any form of property tax in her term
We voted her into government to remove the tax and she did not. Now you want us to kick out the PNM for her to do what exactly? There must be a rum shop open somewhere, go relax and enjoy what Farley and the THA giving you.zoom rader wrote:PariaMan wrote:Makes sense lol. Anyone with a business exempt from tax because they will simply pass it on to customers. Include all land lords too so rent can stay lowThis is 2024wing wrote:She promised to the electorate that her government would axe the tax. She did not. Another poster above says that she was in fact going to implement tax on commercial, then residential. Does axe mean implement?paid_influencer wrote:kamla did not implement any form of property tax in her term
PNM is unfairly taxing US not UNC
U keep beating ur chest Kamla this and Kamla that. We paid no unfair taxes under UNC or PP
Regardless, the standard of living was much better when kamla was in power compared to the sorry excuse for leadership offered by the present administration, she accomplished alot more than Rowley did in his NINE years, don't worry Rowley order imbert to present the best budget to forget the 9 years of hardship to BS the followers like yourself to justify why he should be given another Five yearswing wrote:We voted her into government to remove the tax and she did not. Now you want us to kick out the PNM for her to do what exactly? There must be a rum shop open somewhere, go relax and enjoy what Farley and the THA giving you.zoom rader wrote:PariaMan wrote:Makes sense lol. Anyone with a business exempt from tax because they will simply pass it on to customers. Include all land lords too so rent can stay lowThis is 2024wing wrote:She promised to the electorate that her government would axe the tax. She did not. Another poster above says that she was in fact going to implement tax on commercial, then residential. Does axe mean implement?paid_influencer wrote:kamla did not implement any form of property tax in her term
PNM is unfairly taxing US not UNC
U keep beating ur chest Kamla this and Kamla that. We paid no unfair taxes under UNC or PP
hover11 wrote:So the logic is businessmen shouldn't be subjected to taxes because they will inflate their prices?shake d livin wake d dead wrote:PariaMan wrote:She was hgonna implement the correct way starting with industrial and commercial first
Showing care for the small man
Commercial people would have just passed on that cost to the consumers.... Shrugs shoulders
So Rowley said he would not shutdown Petrotrin and then did just thatshake d livin wake d dead wrote:hover11 wrote:So the logic is businessmen shouldn't be subjected to taxes because they will inflate their prices?shake d livin wake d dead wrote:PariaMan wrote:She was hgonna implement the correct way starting with industrial and commercial first
Showing care for the small man
Commercial people would have just passed on that cost to the consumers.... Shrugs shoulders
I never said businessmen shouldn't be taxed... All I'm saying is when it does happen, the consumer would end up paying for it. How many small businesses you known absorb unnecessary costs?
This is where the consumer has choice, if I notice something I want is too expensive locally, I order it online. If businessmen don't want to absorb any losses or costs and set any price that they wish they are entitled to do such but the consumer has a choice not to buy. If ppl don't buy they have no choice but to drop prices.shake d livin wake d dead wrote:hover11 wrote:So the logic is businessmen shouldn't be subjected to taxes because they will inflate their prices?shake d livin wake d dead wrote:PariaMan wrote:She was hgonna implement the correct way starting with industrial and commercial first
Showing care for the small man
Commercial people would have just passed on that cost to the consumers.... Shrugs shoulders
I never said businessmen shouldn't be taxed... All I'm saying is when it does happen, the consumer would end up paying for it. How many small businesses you known absorb unnecessary costs?
We ? Who is we ?wing wrote:We voted her into government to remove the tax and she did not. Now you want us to kick out the PNM for her to do what exactly? There must be a rum shop open somewhere, go relax and enjoy what Farley and the THA giving you.zoom rader wrote:PariaMan wrote:Makes sense lol. Anyone with a business exempt from tax because they will simply pass it on to customers. Include all land lords too so rent can stay lowThis is 2024wing wrote:She promised to the electorate that her government would axe the tax. She did not. Another poster above says that she was in fact going to implement tax on commercial, then residential. Does axe mean implement?paid_influencer wrote:kamla did not implement any form of property tax in her term
PNM is unfairly taxing US not UNC
U keep beating ur chest Kamla this and Kamla that. We paid no unfair taxes under UNC or PP
I do not want it to stopshake d livin wake d dead wrote:Allyuh know allyuh fighting a lose battle right? Either way yuh hada pay.... Tanty K had the power to stop it and didn't... Atm she doesn't even look to be a favorite come next year.
Exactlyshake d livin wake d dead wrote:Allyuh know allyuh fighting a lose battle right? Either way yuh hada pay.... Tanty K had the power to stop it and didn't... Atm she doesn't even look to be a favorite come next year.
AlphaMan wrote:Do you guys see "%" on your assessment forms?
PariaMan wrote:Yes but we can show we disagree by voting out the PNM
Bro the PNM African man are renters & Squaters they dont care about house taxes and have no need to vote non PNM parties.PariaMan wrote:Yes but we can show we disagree by voting out the PNM
zoom rader wrote:Bro the PNM African man are renters & Squaters they dont care about house taxes and have no need to vote non PNM parties.PariaMan wrote:Yes but we can show we disagree by voting out the PNM
The greedy Injuns could not care for less to vote non PNM. Most of these greedy injuns was blanked by UNC and decided to mash up UNC in favor of PNM.
Moral is Trinidad is full of people that only put themselves first and don't give a damm about you.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 72 guests