Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
rfari wrote:pyung99 wrote:rfari wrote:pyung99 wrote:pnm is failure ting man. in a country where leadership on a whole is failure ting, they even hah d likes of manning troll slapping them.
kantness rite tru.
i find d propaganda engines eh even askin for a list of people that applied. dat reeks of kantness too.
I agree with most of what you're saying. Manning is a sick man so I'll excuse his rambling.
IMO pmn has failed to bring pertinent issues wrt this fiasco to the public. And many esteemed minds are not vocal about it.
For instance, how is it possible for the justice minister to send the act to the president all by himself without the permission of the ag and the pm???? How is thus possible?
failure ting rite tru to d president. d president is shown to be just an air head that signs any faqqin thing in front of him. imagine wah else he do willynilly.
According to the constitution, the president can't refuse to give assent to acts of parliament. But at the same time, he's a spineless coward. a similar situation happened between robbie and panday where the latter wanted to enact some contentious legislation. Robbie refused to sign and there was an uproar and legal debate on constitutional reform and all the usual talk. In the end, robbie had to sign but he drew attention to what he thought was a potentially dangerous law
Habit7 wrote:
Well is only failure thing if you only seek to be informed by hearsay and 100 word newspaper articles
eliteauto wrote:so the Legal Notice regarding Section 34 was gazetted on Sept 10th, so how is it possible that certain persons could go to a judge and apply for reprieve under the section before it was gazetted?
shogun wrote:Accountability at it's finest.
shogun wrote:Habit7 wrote:
reeks of desperation.
Soul Collector wrote:The CoP issued orders to man the highway and PBR from beetham go up to POS. They expecting fallouts from the usual idiots plus supporters going up from both parties I hear so the army is out with them as well.
Hopefully it pass without conflict. I wanna go in town later
pyung99 wrote:any good arguments vs d ag yet?
rfari wrote:pyung99 wrote:any good arguments vs d ag yet?
Listened to it a bit. Most of what we know already has been rehashed by the opposition. Pp members treating it like a pappyshow and wade mark was doing an ok job as speaker until he started to cockblock
Warner: Rowley targets AG because of race
By Asha Javeed asha.javeed@trinidadexpress.com
Story Created: Oct 27, 2012 at 10:57 PM ECT
Story Updated: Oct 27, 2012 at 10:57 PM ECT
The People's National Movement (PNM) motion of censure which was brought against Attorney General Anand Ramlogan was "resoundingly" defeated early yesterday morning.
The 15-hour marathon session, which began at 1.30 p.m. last Friday and ended at 5.03 a.m. yesterday, had 25 Members of Parliament voting against the motion and 11 members of the Opposition bench voting in its favour.
The Opposition brought the motion to have the Prime Minister sack Ramlogan over his role in the Section 34 fiasco. The Prime Minister's only disciplinary action over Section 34 has been the firing of former Justice Minister Herbert Volney for misleading her Cabinet.
Volney and Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Dookeran did not vote in the censure motion.
Volney yesterday told the Sunday Express he left Parliament at Tower D, International Waterfront Centre, Port of Spain, during the tea break last Friday and had hoped to return later in the night but did not make it back.
Dookeran said he left Parliament at 9 p.m.
In winding up the debate, National Security Minister Jack Warner surmised that no explanation offered by the Government for the Section 34 fiasco would satisfy the People's National Movement (PNM). In his view, the PNM had "no moral authority" to tell the Prime Minister how to govern and was "minding the mark" in the belief that it will get them into office at the next general election.
In defending Ramlogan, Warner charged that Rowley had signaled him out for "persecution" because of his ethnicity.
"It's because you have a problem with the individual," he said.
Warner questioned how come Rowley did not have "one" like him sitting on the PNM benches or going up for elections in the PNM convention which takes place today. (See Page 7.)
"They don't count. You are attacking the Attorney General because the AG represents the things you dislike," said Warner. His statement elicited cross talk in the Parliament chamber but Warner was not persuaded to stop.
He asked if Rowley had canvassed the opinions of people from Chaguanas or Barataria/San Juan on their views on Section 34.
Warner reminded Rowley that he and his members voted for the bill and that the PNM was bent on making "superficial statements" to support its conspiracy theories.
He charged that while the PNM may appear "self-righteous" and "sanctimonious", the public was "more intelligent than that".
Wading into the contribution made by Opposition MP Colm Imbert, Warner belittled his "Sherlock Holmes/Dick Tracy" explanation of the section 34 debacle. Warner said Imbert's statement that the Gazetted notice was not available online until September 10 was simply because that was the date and time it was uploaded onto the website.
This, he said, had nothing to do with the preparation of the notice but was the only time it was available for download from the website.
He said that the PNM with its "top class lawyers" had missed the fallout of the Section 34 clause.
"There is no basis for putting the blame on the AG for Section 34," said Warner.
He said the Cabinet note of August 6 contained representations from the former Justice Minister and not the AG.
rfari wrote:This is how tribal politics is perpetuated today. Pit one ethnicity against another. Throw a major spanner in the wheel of forward thinking. Thats the sort of thinking that users like uml and zoom zader subscribe to. They will want to justify jw statement by countering with baseless claims from dr eric williams days to the present. The fear of other ethnicities is what they have been fed by their caregivers and in turn they try to feed other people with it
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: matr1x and 90 guests