Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Redman wrote:Depending on the politics of the website you're on that study is either inconclusive ...(finding no support for X does not support the opposite of X.)
Or crap and manipulated stats.
And why include suicide?
But my posts here were about ones ability to defend oneself and the family against a crime.
I'm advocating allowing those that want a gun and are qualified(no crime history,stable mentally and willing to submit to drug test etc)...to be able to get one.
I've never said anything about vigilante justice, or arming everyone willi nilli.
We have a system where a blank FUL application can be signed off by the CoP if he likes...or full proper apps remain ignored....that's sheit
CDC numbers show gun related homicides decreased while gun ownership increased.
I will find the link and post when I get back.
I would also say that we should use LOCAL data to inform our decisions...the US experience is way different to ours.
A large majority (93 percent) of fatalities from paraquat poisoning are suicides, which occur mostly in developing countries.[36] For instance, in Samoa from 1979–2001, 70 percent of suicides were by paraquat poisoning. Trinidad and Tobago is particularly well known for its incidence of suicides involving the use of Gramoxone (commercial name of paraquat). In southern Trinidad, particularly in Penal, Debe from 1996–1997, 76 percent of suicides were by paraquat, 96 percent of which involved the over-consumption of alcohol such as rum.[37]
Redman wrote:But my posts here were about ones ability to defend oneself and the family against a crime.
I'm advocating allowing those that want a gun and are qualified(no crime history,stable mentally and willing to submit to drug test etc)...to be able to get one.
I've never said anything about vigilante justice, or arming everyone willi nilli.
We have a system where a blank FUL application can be signed off by the CoP if he likes...or full proper apps remain ignored....that's sheit...
I would also say that we should use LOCAL data to inform our decisions...the US experience is way different to ours.
1. So you think people people only kill weeds with Gramoxone? Suicide and other usage must be considered when reviewing such policies.
2. qualified? who is going to do the distribution, who is going to determine that? the same corrupted people who have us in this situation now?
4. Local data vs US experience.... well if we don't have it in place yet... where you want me to get the data from? I am quoting from the US where I think the detection rate for homicides is 60+% (no too sure), that is a wayyyy better position than we are in. We'll have a horrid experience in comparison then
The_Honourable wrote:On one end i can see where the mother is coming from but... you are closing an avenue that can be vital to the investigation. Probably she already knows? She saw the CCTV tapes and that's all she needs to know? and that's all the police needs? This is going to leave more questions with conspiracy theories.
I really hope this case doesn't go cold like the rest.
Redman wrote:But we know a crime was committed.
Isn't the state entitled to demand a 2nd autopsy...wouldn't this be necessary to successfully prosecute?
Les Bain wrote:Not sure of the legitimacy, but this was a real difficult read.
http://local-reports.com/em-shannon-kil ... -arrested/
If it is true, it's even harder to know this thing will wade through legal limbo for a decade, all for nothing.
rollingstock wrote:Les Bain wrote:Not sure of the legitimacy, but this was a real difficult read.
http://local-reports.com/em-shannon-kil ... -arrested/
If it is true, it's even harder to know this thing will wade through legal limbo for a decade, all for nothing.
That report is erroneous
rollingstock wrote:Les Bain wrote:Not sure of the legitimacy, but this was a real difficult read.
http://local-reports.com/em-shannon-kil ... -arrested/
If it is true, it's even harder to know this thing will wade through legal limbo for a decade, all for nothing.
That report is erroneous
rollingstock wrote:Les Bain wrote:Not sure of the legitimacy, but this was a real difficult read.
http://local-reports.com/em-shannon-kil ... -arrested/
If it is true, it's even harder to know this thing will wade through legal limbo for a decade, all for nothing.
That report is erroneous
toyolink wrote:No 2nd autopsy makes more sense now.
If police/DPP wasn't finishes the planned funeral for tomorrow was in jeopardy.
Still cant understand the kind of madness that is now causing all this 'pain'.
T&T just bathing in blood and anguish.
Shannon's autopsy report completed
Smothered with towel
The completed autopsy into the cause of death for Shannon Banfield yesterday revealed the 20-year-old was smothered with a towel in the IAM and Company Limited warehouse where she was found.
Last Friday, pathologist Dr Hughvon Des Vignes had stated that the autopsy was inconclusive pending further investigations. Yesterday, Des Vignes finally completed his report after Crime Scene Investigators returned to where Banfield was found and discovered a bloodied towel they suspect was used to end her life and took it back to the FSC for testing.
Now that a cause of death has been determined, police can and have sought advice on whether to charge a suspect in police custody for the death. Without the cause of death, a charge could not have been proffered against anyone, since only the cause of death can determine whether it was a natural or unnatural death.
Up to late last night, investigators were deliberating with Director of Public Prosecutions, Roger Gaspard SC, on whether or not to charge a suspect in Banfield's murder.
On Saturday, Matthew Maharaj, a man once deemed a person of interest in the killing, was released from police custody after no evidence was found linking him to the murder.
Maharaj and all other employees were questioned by police and all but one was subsequently released. He and the other man were the only ones whose photographs and names were released by the police as being able to assist them in their investigations last week. On his release, Maharaj called for an apology and questioned how he was going to move on now that his character had been smeared.
The other employee was recently transferred to the Charlotte Street branch of IAM due to staff shortage, company officials said. The man has been employed at the company for the past four months and was transferred about a month ago. Police said they have also seized pornographic material during their investigation.
Banfield, of Mc Carthy Street, Cantaro Village, Santa Cruz, was last seen leaving her work place—RBL's Independence Square branch—around 4 pm last Monday. In a telephone conversation with her mother Sherry-Ann Lopez around that time, Banfield had said she was leaving work to purchase items at the same store (IAM) she was eventually found in. Lopez said she would normally drop off and pick up her daughter from work, but she (Banfield) decided to travel on Monday.
Banfield's body was discovered hidden under some boxes in company's third- floor storeroom around 1.30 pm on Thursday by employees who were searching for the source of a strong decomposing scent they believed was a dead rat. Banfield's purse and shopping bags were found near to her body.
Banfield will be buried today following a church service at the Seventh Day Adventist Church at Prizgar Road, San Juan.
http://www.guardian.co.tt/news/2016-12-12/smothered-towel
shogun wrote:So many questions.... I'm not going to ask though.
The authorities should try to convince the family of the importance of having the pathologist be conclusive in this case.
If this perpetrator is a sociopath, then many more women could be in trouble, if he's not caught
Slartibartfast wrote:Enabling the citizens to protecting themselves is akin to treating the symptoms of a disease instead of finding a cure.uncle sam wrote:to me enabling citizens to protect themselves hints on victim blaming... that is not how u eliminate criminals
Anyone asked themselves "what creates criminals?" First you need to figure that out and address it accordingly. I doubt a lack of firepower among citizens is what creates criminals. Therefore increasing access to guns would only act as a temporary deterrent until criminals figure out how to move accordingly. Who knows, they may just start shooting first when they come to rob you. Then, guess what, they have another firearm to add to their arsenal.
What is clear is that this problem is not going away unless some serious thought and strategic planning takes place (beyond the police commissioner just stating that some serious thought and strategic planning going to take place) Right now all we have is a bunch of unqualified individuals (especially tuners) just saying to bring back the death penalty and give everybody guns like that going to make anything better and not showing any reasoning beyond "yeah dat go stop dem".
*sigh* whatever yes.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 93 guests