Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Redman wrote:i think Jwala is an arrogant Kant.
Although having read the his address..he eh say anything wrong.
I disagree with naming the organizations.
But having done so....all of them SELL stuff here.
ALL that stuff needs to be bought and imported..with USD.
bluesclues wrote:Dr. Rowley. fire imbert and replace him. he's hoodwinking you and has been for years in the pnm. i dont think its that he stupid anymore. from the bs expectation of oil to rise, to his track record in all ministry. he's a bullshytter.
bluesclues wrote:Dr. Rowley. fire imbert and replace him. he's hoodwinking you and has been for years in the pnm. i dont think its that he stupid anymore. from the bs expectation of oil to rise, to his track record in all ministry. he's a bullshytter.
where then iz lie?
Redman wrote:So..any one know what the actual numbers are?
With oil cut in half....a reduction in growth is inevitable.
From what I've seen we have gone from 0.1% growth to -1.7%
what does this actually mean to us?
the way I see it we could be making a mountain out of a mole hill.
The questions remain the same...what we doing differently?
Daran wrote:Let PNM clean up this mess, but surely that won't happen, they've already made countless poor move with VAT.
Habit7 wrote:Daran wrote:Let PNM clean up this mess, but surely that won't happen, they've already made countless poor move with VAT.
Wow the new VAT policy hasn't come into play yet but ppl get poor by future reduction in VAT?
Back to the Future Poverty?
desifemlove wrote:http://www.cnbc.com/2015/12/10/opec-pre ... -2016.html http://www.cnbc.com/2015/11/13/why-oil- ... ntary.html where then iz lie?
RASC wrote:He and Howai should be charged for treason.
I seriously believe they're enemies of the state.
Both of their messages never matched up.
Both kept a lid on the seriousness of the impending situation.
Both are taking orders from powers who do not hold the countries' interests at heart.
Numb3r4 wrote:desifemlove wrote:http://www.cnbc.com/2015/12/10/opec-pre ... -2016.html http://www.cnbc.com/2015/11/13/why-oil- ... ntary.html where then iz lie?
That article did acknowledge that production from non-OPEC members will be less so this might send prices up, however it did not take into consideration the impact of the Iranian oil hitting the market, it did say that Iran would not cut production in fact they may be looking to increase production.
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:Maybe you should tell it directly to the banks and not just on tuner?
Redman wrote:where then iz lie?
Cuz it eh come from Blues Clues.
He was the first to predict the death of the entire global oil complex.
And I recall a recommendation(dont ask for details) to sell off ALL the Oil reserves of TnT
He also was the first to postulate that the Yuan would strengthen and move into reserve status despite the demise of the dollar being a long held POV.
So basically if he eh say it .....its a lie.
So a Minister of Finance quoting the EIA(what the fack do they know) is poor form....unless it syncs with BC POV.
![]()
I hope this helps
and i didnt say all the reserves. i said HALF. but ud probably have to understand my investment strategy to understand why i said that. that being said, had we done so, and invested in the avenues and energy sales i was referring to since then and before.. an investment of 5bn ttd wouldve been valued at 10bn right now. part of the deficit would have been paid, and we'd still have the cash to talk about doing it again.
Redman wrote:and i didnt say all the reserves. i said HALF. but ud probably have to understand my investment strategy to understand why i said that. that being said, had we done so, and invested in the avenues and energy sales i was referring to since then and before.. an investment of 5bn ttd wouldve been valued at 10bn right now. part of the deficit would have been paid, and we'd still have the cash to talk about doing it again.
I see you have the same source for yourideas.
John Heywood, the English author, almost 500 years ago, coined the saying, “Can't see the forest for the trees”.
So much focus is being placed on the Central Bank Governor's disclosure of the main users of foreign exchange that the primary issue has been overshadowed.
How have these businesses enhanced our economy with the forex?
The key issue is whether or not the use of the foreign exchange is benefiting the economy of Trinidad and Tobago.
The Manufacturers Association claim foul but what do they manufacture? Are they true manufacturers or merely assemblers of foreign products, which are labelled manufactured in Trinidad and Tobago?
How much foreign exchange is earned by these manufacturers and how much return to Trinidad and Tobago?
Having had the disclosure of the key players and the amounts of foreign exchange that they consume, the Minister of Finance, instead of making a big issue of the legality or not of the disclosure, should ask the Central Bank to now analyse the use of the forex, with a view of determining the value-add to our economy.
With the benefit of the analysis, the Government can then make the relevant decisions regarding allocation of foreign exchange in a stagnant economy where forex earnings are dwindling and will continue to so do in the foreseeable future.
This information will greatly assist the Economic Advisory Board to suggest tangible and practical means whereby our economy can be better managed.
Since we import almost everything we consume, including basic food items, we may be considered a “foreign exchange-dependent economy”.
What happens when our foreign exchange runs out? In anticipation of this, it seems, the Minister of Finance is already talking about utilising the Heritage and Stabilisation Fund to stabilise the economy. How profound!
What is the value-add of the Economic Advisory Board? To rubber-stamp the decisions of the Government? I strongly believe this is certainly not what Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley has in mind, based on his public utterings to date.
He expects proper analysis and actionable solutions to key issues challenging our economy.
There is a lot of talk about diversification, which may be happening on a too-small scale to materially affect our GDP, so now seems an appropriate time to so do, in light of our stagnated economy.
Our Prime Minister has placed great focus on agriculture, so it is time to be serious about it.
Talking about who got land, who illegally uses land or who uses the land for different purposes are of no value unless systems are in place to gainfully utilise the land.
Ask any farmer, praedial larceny and workers are their key issues.
Focus, seriously, on these. There will be enough workers for agriculture when the manufacturers begin their layoffs, as have already begun.
The Prime Minister, our chief executive officer of the country, needs to be firm with the business users of foreign exchange, where the need is greater than the return to T&T's economy. They will always lay off workers when their profits decrease, so let us transition job loss from the business community to gainful employment in the agriculture industry.
Though I focus on agriculture, other industries also use foreign exchange to assemble their goods. Take for example, Carnival.
How many Carnival bands use local materials for their costumes? Or, are they all “made in China”?
Of what value is the Department of Creative and Festival Arts, at The University of the West Indies, if its output is not tangible enough to engender real creativity in our Carnival to make it number one in the world?
Think of the spin-offs from such an effort, particularly for tourism, a comatose industry in Trinidad and Tobago.
Let us refocus on the real issues of our economy rather than on the political points that can be scored from sensationalising issues, which do not redound to the benefit of us, the citizens of Trinidad and Tobago.
Those whose names were called by the Governor of the Central Bank, if they truly add value to our economy, should be proud to stand up and say “this is how we utilised the foreign exchange and how much more we earned to benefit the economy of Trinidad and Tobago ”. Can they?
There is a very great need to move away from textbook economics and into actionable economics.
src1983 wrote:Sorry for them who living pay check to pay check
cracker wrote:It just keeps getting better!!
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 93 guests