Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Good luck, the old one was the most expensive one on the market behind the hilux, if and only IF they bring this it def. Won't be priced ' well ' Al though ' priced well ' these days is turning into something subjective as it's whoever can afford to pay for it will think it's ' priced well '.blacklight wrote:
https://www.carscoops.com/2022/07/bigger-bolder-2023-volkswagen-amarok-pickup-truck-has-up-to-298-hp/
Once this is priced well ........I see this selling like hot cakes!
zando wrote:Can you screenshot and place the pics here because all I've seen are the older models not the newer ones, those 18 inch rims I wouldn't touch that, roads not good enough in Trinidad, you'll end up spending alot on tires which is why I say the mid version of the 3 (209) in either hatch back or sedan form from SS is the best version because the wheels aren't too big and you get 90 percent of the features of the fully loaded model for 45k less.Dizzy28 wrote:The top end 3s are close to 241k at SS. Locally that's the one with the bigger rim (18" I think)
Based on the photos on the FU page the rims looks like its the top end version so thats a $56k difference. (Assuming a like for like on the models)
I'd only go Foreign used for that IF I'm getting the new model with at least the 2.0 engine.
agent007 wrote:16 years ago, a fully loaded Mazda 3 1.6 "Grade V" with 4AT transmission, 16" rims, mud guards, fog lights, sunroof, rear lip spoiler, IRS and 2 airbags was $155k
Today it's successor by 3 generations is giving us 18" rims, rear disc brakes, 6AT transmission, 6 airbags, rear camera, LED lights, twin exhaust outlets, push button start and a torsion beam rear suspension for $97k extra. Where's the sunroof with leather seats and bose at least? At $252k they could keep it.
Hey alpha male.....is it ok to not want a sunroof? It's ok that it's not a deal-breaker?agent007 wrote:Whilst I'm pleased to learn of the subtle equipment listing updates, SS should have configured the car to also have bose and a sunroof too.
Competition is tough out there and you must be able to offer a package that the customer would want.
https://www.motortrend.com/reviews/2022 ... st-review/
In the link above, the rankings are:
1st: Honda Civic 1.5T
2nd: Hyundai Elantra 2.0
3rd: Nissan Sentra 2.0
4th: Mazda 3 2.5T AWD
5th: Kia Forte (Cerato) 1.6T
6th: Volkswagen Jetta 1.5T
A Sentra and Elantra beating a Mazda 3? Since when? Shame shame shame lol
That's disappointing, I really loved that hatch, took a pic of on in grand Bazaar, it looked real Bess, they said no more hatches at all? Or just for this shipment?Dizzy28 wrote:agent007 wrote:16 years ago, a fully loaded Mazda 3 1.6 "Grade V" with 4AT transmission, 16" rims, mud guards, fog lights, sunroof, rear lip spoiler, IRS and 2 airbags was $155k
Today it's successor by 3 generations is giving us 18" rims, rear disc brakes, 6AT transmission, 6 airbags, rear camera, LED lights, twin exhaust outlets, push button start and a torsion beam rear suspension for $97k extra. Where's the sunroof with leather seats and bose at least? At $252k they could keep it.
Took a visit to Mazda in PoS lunch time today.
They have no Core and Core+ Mazda 3s in stock and there was one EX. This is the one for $252k but the rep said it is different than the one they previously at $242k as this one has leather seats as standard, powered driver and passenger seats and 360° camera.
New stock of 3s supposed to be in TT in August (EX and Core+ only). The hatchback 3 basically is a no according to the rep.
agent007 wrote:I forgot to mention guys but the refreshed 2022 Mazda CX-5 has finally arrived and we now have a more expensive model than the 360k version. Get prepared to dish out those certified cheques.
agent007 wrote:Top spec is now around $400k. The few they got are all sold!
agent007 wrote:Top spec is now around $400k. The few they got are all sold!
SLVR1 wrote:agent007 wrote:Top spec is now around $400k. The few they got are all sold!
Same 2.0L engine? Other than the facelift it's not that big a deal imo. I guess they see how the competition is priced and decided to up the profit margin since the CRV, Forester + RAV top specs. all cross 400k.
agent007 wrote:Business/corporate collusion is an illegal practice in many countries. Is it the same here? What is T&T's equivalent to the Federal Trade Commission? What antitrust laws do we have?
As a small community of enthusiasts, we should come together and form an association to lobby for the reduction of automotive prices and ensure that each represented automaker in our market are aware of what is taking place and perhaps they should step in and ensure that these authorized dealers are not putting their brands in an unfair market position.
We should also lobby for the total eradication of the roro market in an effort to save our nation from unnecessary forex depletion (including the importation of foreign used tyres).
Babwah and Fields got their chance. It's our turn now.
I have a friend going through this with a Nissan note e-power, it's popular roll on roll off company who always has videos on fb, they told her they have parts for it so they can get the sale but now that the car needs parts they don't carry any now as the car too ' new ' Al thought by now it would have been a few years, smh she also can't find a good hybrid mechanic to fix any issues and the ' good ' ones charging a pound and a crown lolagent007 wrote:Good points admittedly!
Unfortunately, the roro market is in itself not a very sustainable model for a few reasons:
1. It still takes precious US to import them
2. How do we treat with the issue of rolled back/tampered odometers?
3. Vehicles imported into our market which were not specifically designed for our conditions including the fuels we use.
4. What about access to service and warranty, you know the typical after sale support?
5. Let’s be real here, if we do aspire to be a developed nation, we all know that we can’t continue to import used vehicles into this country.
We need a certain level of standardization in that industry. Eg. A particular roro dealer in Couva brought in a small crossover/cuv known as the Suzuki Vitara Brezza as well as a new Tata forward single cab pickups (amongst many other examples). Buyers should have a reasonable expectation that these won’t be one-off sales because the argument for the ease of access to parts such as windscreen and warranty support should be there. One-off sales also affect resale value too.
Purchasing a new roro vehicle is a gamble because up to now, I/we were not given a proper explanation as to how these grey market dealers are going to treat with warranty issues and legitimate manufacturer recalls, TSB’s and software updates.
So whilst it’s nice that a larger segment of society can purchase a vehicle whether it’s cash or via loan, one of the issues I have is having to witness people on a personal basis who purchased a roro vehicle say via loan for 5 years and they expect a certain level of reliability, yet they are only covered for a month according to Ministry guidelines?
What if the transmission fails or a stone crack the windshield and no one has any in stock or a headlight is cracked and no one has it? So the vehicle is down for repairs but the loan installment is still required. What about those who have coolant mixing with oil? But the odometer saying 25,000kms yet people suffering from head gasket failure, valve cover seal failure, pcv failure and timing belt failure etc? And their loans still have to be paid?
Who protects the ‘poor’ roro owners in these instances? But I’m willing to accept that these challenges probably weigh less than the overall benefit of going roro and the number of people who actually buy and end up with a trouble free car for years, despite the engine having more than 200,000kms.
The common denominator here is that we need better consumer protection laws for both sides.
Now, the market is speaking louder than words can express. There seems to be a resale value enhancement when one is selling a vehicle and has advertised it as “local used”, am I right or wrong?
Eg.
1999 Nissan Sunny Super Saloon (B14) vs
1999 Nissan Sentra Super Saloon (B14)
2005 Nissan Sunny Super Saloon (N16) vs
2005 Nissan Almera SG-L (N16)
2019 Nissan Sylphy (B17) vs
2019 Nissan Sentra (B17)
2015 Mitsubishi Galant Fortis (CY) vs
2015 Mitsubishi Lancer EX GT (CY)
2018 Mazda Axela vs
2018 Mazda 3
2015 Toyota Corolla Altis/Axio vs
2015 Toyota Corolla
2017 Toyota Vios vs
2017 Toyota Yaris
Watch those examples above closely and tell me if I lie when I say that the resale of the local equivalent would be more then the roro equivalent.
Food for thought!
***edited***
So we are left to the mercy of the dealership with third world vehicles and pricey service. You are comfortable with persons being forced to buy the very same vehicles u love to hate on with substandard safety features and build quality, while the few models that are assembled in Japan, Korea and Europe/USA are priced out of the reach of the average person. I will agree that the RORO industry is full of scamps, but there needs to be the understanding of what going RORO entails wrt warranty support, service and resale. However, the new car dealers also engage in unscrupulous scampish behaviour that u like to not mention. Also you seem to have a lot of examples of malfunctioning RORO vehicles. As for me, I personally have owned 4 RORO vehicles and will estimate that between friends and family, the ownership rate of RORO is about 75%. And they mostly have had good experiences. My advice to any prospective RORO buyer is to assume that the mileage has been tampered with, but this can be mitigated by choosing a vehicle that is also available in the USA or Europe where hard to find parts locally can be sourced. RORO can and has worked for the most part. Your argument for abolishment sounds eerily similar to the finance minister tbh.agent007 wrote:You see that’s the thing. Thanks for the example btw! Many of the JDM imports are coming with additional safety features which is not a bad thing, so don’t get me wrong but consider superficial damage to say the front bumper, rear bumper or wing mirrors.
Some of these bumpers have the parking sensors supplied straight from the factory. If you damage that, can you get an exact replacement for it? What about the wing mirrors with the heater function, camera and blind spot light. If that gets swiped away, can you get the exact copy for replacement?
I know someone who purchased the roro Swift which came with some nice safety features, you name it, it has it (like crash mitigation and warning, lane change alert and assist etc.)
Her front bumper got damaged and her windshield got cracked. Straightener and painter could not get the exact replacement bumper skin from the bamboo but he did manage to get a replacement skin which does not have the sensors. In addition, the forward facing crash/lane watch camera mounted on top the windshield has a particular spot it must go in. The windshield replacement company did not have the proper windshield to accommodate the camera so they installed the glass which fits.
Thing is, the camera got stuck back on but it is out of alignment and is impeded by the dark band that runs across. As a result, there is a permanent warning light indicating a malfunction with the system and of course she lost the forward sensors feedback.
What about roro vehicles coming with fancy headlights with auto leveling and cornering functions etc. in a frontal impact, when it comes to replacement, are we guaranteed an exact replacement to it? The answer is no. I know of a Mazda Axela owner with the front auto leveling function and after a frontal collision, he couldn’t get the exact replacement in the bamboo, instead he ended up getting the regular projectors.
Lastly, what about them Xtrail Hybrid Autech owners with the rear bumper that accommodates dual exhaust outlets. There’s one from the west where someone ran into the back of him and today he installed a regular non Autech T32 rear bumper on his vehicle which looks awkward I might add.
It shouldn’t be this way. The only thing left for these people to do is to go to the respective authorized dealerships armed with their VIN and hope that they would special order the part/s. They probably would ask, but why satisfy a roro customer who did not patronize us when we could take that same USD and order replacement parts for our genuine customers?
Again, the feedback is welcomed.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests