Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
desifemlove wrote:Country_Bookie wrote:Union were offered the option of workers taking all their accumulated vacation now and the company would hold on laying off workers. They would consider restarting the plant next year if there was sufficient demand.
Union declined this option and the company said fcuk off. #owtuforever
so what de issue? oh..i forgot..iz Rowley's fault...he needs to control the global steel industry or gtfo and call elections..
Habit7 wrote:Once again, unions chasing business from the country.
pete wrote:Remember where it began?
From page 1
"In a press release, the company said: “Following the inability to reach agreement with the Steel Workers Union of Trinidad and Tobago (SWUTT) on a proposal from the management of ArcelorMittal Point Lisas for workers with accrued vacation days to proceed on paid vacation, while workers who do not have vacation leave to engage in alternative functions on a temporary basis outside of their normal duties, the Company has had no option but to begin a process of laying-off workers”."
pete wrote:Remember where it began?
From page 1
"In a press release, the company said: “Following the inability to reach agreement with the Steel Workers Union of Trinidad and Tobago (SWUTT) on a proposal from the management of ArcelorMittal Point Lisas for workers with accrued vacation days to proceed on paid vacation, while workers who do not have vacation leave to engage in alternative functions on a temporary basis outside of their normal duties, the Company has had no option but to begin a process of laying-off workers”."
src1983 wrote:The court and union forgot that Mittal is not a charity it's a profit business
Would you continue to sell mangoes if you only making $2 and they costing $5
src1983 wrote:The court and union forgot that Mittal is not a charity it's a profit business
Would you continue to sell mangoes if you only making $2 and they costing $5
Point noted.pugboy wrote:So who laughing now?
konartis wrote:^^ no they don't...there are guidelines based on proper practice, but a private company can do as they please and if a person is affected, they can seek redress in the court based on mortality. There are no laws that govern them, this is why the government sector is well protected...laws are clearly set out in relation to employees etc...
Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:Point noted.pugboy wrote:So who laughing now?
ArcelorMittal confirms closure; says employees will get all payments they're entitled to
”
I think the courts set a precedent with the first rulingEmilioA wrote:Allergic2BunnyEars wrote:Point noted.pugboy wrote:So who laughing now?
ArcelorMittal confirms closure; says employees will get all payments they're entitled to
”
At least those laid off workers will get thier money. The others ? Who knows.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], pugboy and 162 guests