Stop the killing in GAZA-Boycott Israeli products NOW!!

[Country_Bookie]

Tens of thousands marched through London calling for a halt to the bloody conflict in Gaza and a ban on UK arms exports to Israel.

The demonstration began at BBC Broadcasting House in Portland Place and marched past the US Embassy, then on to Hyde Park, where the rally continued. Speakers included George Galloway and Diane Abbott, with crowd estimates ranging from15,000 to 100,000.

"Today's national demonstration will give people from across the country the chance to say enough is enough, Israel's siege of Gaza and its occupation of Palestinian land has to end now," Sarah Colborne, director of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign.

The march is being held as a public appeal for funds to help the victims of Israel's attacks on Gaza raise more than £4.5m in less than 24 hours.

Saleh Saeed, DEC chief executive, told the Guardian: "The funds are desperately needed, with ongoing fighting in Gaza creating an unbearable situation for families and children. Despite the end of the ceasefire, aid is getting through… but with the scale of the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, they urgently need more money to scale up their life-saving work."

Pressure group Peace Now has called on supporters to rally on Saturday night in Tel Aviv against the conflict and to call for a diplomatic solution.

Activists from various groups, including the Stop the War Coalition marched through London to a rally in Hyde Park.

Jeremy Corbyn, chairman of the Stop the War Coalition told the Voice of Russia: "The message we are giving to our government is two things. One, that there is a £8 billion trade between Britain and Israel in arms and related equipment, which think should stop because of Israel's of behaviour in Gaza.

"Secondly, the question of the European Union – Israel trade agreement, which includes human rights clauses in it – all of which have been breached by Israel – and which is now under investigation for war crimes at the United Nations Human Rights Council."

[zoom rader]

^^^ even in Scotland there are protests and ppl are not buying from Jewish store's.

[boxy]

so let Hamas shoot rockets everyday whole day and do nothing then people will stop the boycott. nice..... Why arnt these people walking through the streets against the extremist for using children as sheilds. for the sole understanding that they would be martyrs? I give up on trying to understand human rationale.

[Team Loco]

so let Hamas shoot rockets everyday whole day and do nothing then people will stop the boycott. nice..... Why arnt these people walking through the streets against the extremist for using children as sheilds. for the sole understanding that they would be martyrs? I give up on trying to understand human rationale.

It goes both ways. Yes hamas is a problem but dont accept the utter crap the west wants to feed you aabout them using children as human shields. Even the united nations has said israel is bombing its schools. Its no coincidence israel is targeting children because their tactic seems logical. Its like a long term investment. Kill the kids in order to kill the future of palestine.

[zoom rader]

^^^ duh waste time with dem clowns Loco, they only see one side of the story and beleive CNN news. Same as the rest of the world that beleive Iraq had weapons of mass distructions , when in fact Jack chit was found which lead the current state of mess in Iraq with Isis.

[Team Loco]

^^^ duh waste time with dem clowns Loco, they only see one side of the story and beleive CNN news. Same as the rest of the world that beleive Iraq had weapons of mass distructions , when in fact Jack chit was found which lead the current state of mess in Iraq with Isis.

Yup. Imagine how that was downplayed. No weapons. I can understand their ignorance to the facts. If they are fed the waste and one sided stories of the west media.

[metalgear2095]

Boycott Hamas first

[Team Loco]

Boycott Hamas first

Dont worry. They just as bad as israel. How do we boycott them?

[Team Loco]

The webster dictionary may as well state the meaning of the word terrorist as "a muslim person who creates terror". Because if we see anyone other than a muslim with guns shooting up the place, he is "mentally unstable" and needs help. He is not a terrorist. The west has done well to make all muslims be termed as terrorists

[meccalli]

they only see one side of the story and beleive CNN news.

Why you think all them people there?, lopsided media by cnn and bbc.

[Duane 3NE 2NR]

Boycott Hamas first

Dont worry. They just as bad as israel. How do we boycott them?

But Hamas is the government in Gaza, elected by the people.

[*$kїđž!™]

hamas wants israeli officials to come back to negotiation table.....but they dont want to stop firing rockets into israel while negotiations are ongoing......plus they dont want to disarm but expect israel to open its borders to them.......

yeah sure this will happen.....

hamas needs to be removed for peace.....

[konartis]

they should send all the supporters from trinidad over there to actually help!

[shogun]

hamas wants israeli officials to come back to negotiation table.....but they dont want to stop firing rockets into israel while negotiations are ongoing......plus they dont want to disarm but expect israel to open its borders to them.......

Ent.

Pure insanity.

We're willing to negotiate, but we'll keep firing rockets into your territory while we try to come up with a peaceful solution... Oh! and Death to Israel.

[*$kїđž!™]

they should send all the supporters from trinidad over there to actually help!

I for that......Lets send those ppl here who against israel defense of their country to gaza.....lets arm them and send them on the border...

[Slartibartfast]

But... but... they stop buy KFC and buying Royal Castle instead. Shouldn't that cripple Israel enough for the Gaza to overcome them?

[megadoc1]

so let Hamas shoot rockets everyday whole day and do nothing then people will stop the boycott. nice..... Why arnt these people walking through the streets against the extremist for using children as sheilds. for the sole understanding that they would be martyrs? I give up on trying to understand human rationale.

It goes both ways. Yes hamas is a problem but dont accept the utter crap the west wants to feed you aabout them using children as human shields. Even the united nations has said israel is bombing its schools. Its no coincidence israel is targeting children because their tactic seems logical. Its like a long term investment. Kill the kids in order to kill the future of palestine.

just for u loco




take a look at this too


https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=829264703763068



this vid shows how to invite a strike from israel
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=688065427909994&fref=nf

[*$kїđž!™]

I cant understand how some ppl dont see the logic behind it...

they just listen to their holy men preach about how jews must be wiped out and they go with that.....

use your own brain and think logically about the situation......clearly hamas is at fault....IMHO

[civicman]

[boxy]

Remember T mention when using the above map that the captured this land during the Arab alliance war where Jordan Syria palistine Iraq and Egypt surrounded them. They won the war more or less and claimed the spoils. They still have a price of Syria if im not mistaken. Think its Golan Heights. Also mention when using this map when they captured the land they gave the palistines within it the option of Israeli citizenship. Most didn't want it but they chose to be residents. Don't use dotish maps that outline half truths and propaganda bruh

[megadoc1]

that's correct boxy most failed to understand/mention that Israel took those land during the war against them.they also took the Sinai desert from Egypt but gave it back because they attacked Egypt first in that war...this pic here seems more realistic

[Slartibartfast]

Don't forget the Iranians attacked first because their lands were taken from them... By the UN as shown in the first pic. I don't think Iran agreed to this so they tried to get their land back. And it's been an on and off conflict ever since.

[megadoc1]

During the First World War an Arab uprising and British campaign led by General Edmund Allenby, the British Empire's commander of the Egyptian Expeditionary Force, drove the Turks out of the Levant, a part of which was the Sinai and Palestine Campaign.[2] The United Kingdom had agreed in the McMahon–Hussein Correspondence that it would honour Arab independence if they revolted against the Ottomans. The two sides had different interpretations of this agreement. In the event, the UK and France divided up the area under the Sykes–Picot Agreement, an act of betrayal in the opinion of the Arabs. Further confusing the issue was the Balfour Declaration promising support for a Jewish "national home" in Palestine. After the war ended, a military administration, named Occupied Enemy Territory Administration, was established in the captured territory of the former Ottoman Syria. The British sought legitimacy for their continued control of the region and this was achieved by obtaining a mandate from the League of Nations in June 1922. The formal objective of the League of Nations Mandate system was to administer parts of the defunct Ottoman Empire, which had been in control of the Middle East since the 16th century, "until such time as they are able to stand alone."[3] The civil Mandate administration was formalized with the League of Nations' consent in 1923 under the British Mandate for Palestine, which covered two administrative areas. The land west of the Jordan River, known as Palestine, was under direct British administration until 1948, while the land east of the Jordan was a semi-autonomous region known as Transjordan, under the rule of the Hashemite family from the Hijaz, and gained independence in 1946.[4]

read more http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandatory_Palestine

and check out these articles http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McMahon%E2%80%93Hussein_Correspondence

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sykes%E2%80%93Picot_Agreement

[Dizzy28]

Don't forget the Iranians attacked first because their lands were taken from them... By the UN as shown in the first pic. I don't think Iran agreed to this so they tried to get their land back. And it's been an on and off conflict ever since.

I don't think the Persians (Iranians) lived there though!!

[HSA]

During the First World War an Arab uprising and British campaign led by General Edmund Allenby, the British Empire's commander of the Egyptian Expeditionary Force, drove the Turks out of the Levant, a part of which was the Sinai and Palestine Campaign.[2] The United Kingdom had agreed in the McMahon–Hussein Correspondence that it would honour Arab independence if they revolted against the Ottomans. The two sides had different interpretations of this agreement. In the event, the UK and France divided up the area under the Sykes–Picot Agreement, an act of betrayal in the opinion of the Arabs. Further confusing the issue was the Balfour Declaration promising support for a Jewish "national home" in Palestine. After the war ended, a military administration, named Occupied Enemy Territory Administration, was established in the captured territory of the former Ottoman Syria. The British sought legitimacy for their continued control of the region and this was achieved by obtaining a mandate from the League of Nations in June 1922. The formal objective of the League of Nations Mandate system was to administer parts of the defunct Ottoman Empire, which had been in control of the Middle East since the 16th century, "until such time as they are able to stand alone."[3] The civil Mandate administration was formalized with the League of Nations' consent in 1923 under the British Mandate for Palestine, which covered two administrative areas. The land west of the Jordan River, known as Palestine, was under direct British administration until 1948, while the land east of the Jordan was a semi-autonomous region known as Transjordan, under the rule of the Hashemite family from the Hijaz, and gained independence in 1946.[4]

read more http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandatory_Palestine

and check out these articles http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McMahon%E2%80%93Hussein_Correspondence

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sykes%E2%80%93Picot_Agreement

You do know that wikipedia is a BS source for information. Thats why if used as a reference in a UWI assignment, you'll immediately fail................

[shogun]

Lol...

[Dizzy28]

During the First World War an Arab uprising and British campaign led by General Edmund Allenby, the British Empire's commander of the Egyptian Expeditionary Force, drove the Turks out of the Levant, a part of which was the Sinai and Palestine Campaign.[2] The United Kingdom had agreed in the McMahon–Hussein Correspondence that it would honour Arab independence if they revolted against the Ottomans. The two sides had different interpretations of this agreement. In the event, the UK and France divided up the area under the Sykes–Picot Agreement, an act of betrayal in the opinion of the Arabs. Further confusing the issue was the Balfour Declaration promising support for a Jewish "national home" in Palestine. After the war ended, a military administration, named Occupied Enemy Territory Administration, was established in the captured territory of the former Ottoman Syria. The British sought legitimacy for their continued control of the region and this was achieved by obtaining a mandate from the League of Nations in June 1922. The formal objective of the League of Nations Mandate system was to administer parts of the defunct Ottoman Empire, which had been in control of the Middle East since the 16th century, "until such time as they are able to stand alone."[3] The civil Mandate administration was formalized with the League of Nations' consent in 1923 under the British Mandate for Palestine, which covered two administrative areas. The land west of the Jordan River, known as Palestine, was under direct British administration until 1948, while the land east of the Jordan was a semi-autonomous region known as Transjordan, under the rule of the Hashemite family from the Hijaz, and gained independence in 1946.[4]

read more http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandatory_Palestine

and check out these articles http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McMahon%E2%80%93Hussein_Correspondence

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sykes%E2%80%93Picot_Agreement

You do know that wikipedia is a BS source for information. Thats why if used as a reference in a UWI assignment, you'll immediately fail................

Well then suggest a more valid source of information!!

[HSA]

During the First World War an Arab uprising and British campaign led by General Edmund Allenby, the British Empire's commander of the Egyptian Expeditionary Force, drove the Turks out of the Levant, a part of which was the Sinai and Palestine Campaign.[2] The United Kingdom had agreed in the McMahon–Hussein Correspondence that it would honour Arab independence if they revolted against the Ottomans. The two sides had different interpretations of this agreement. In the event, the UK and France divided up the area under the Sykes–Picot Agreement, an act of betrayal in the opinion of the Arabs. Further confusing the issue was the Balfour Declaration promising support for a Jewish "national home" in Palestine. After the war ended, a military administration, named Occupied Enemy Territory Administration, was established in the captured territory of the former Ottoman Syria. The British sought legitimacy for their continued control of the region and this was achieved by obtaining a mandate from the League of Nations in June 1922. The formal objective of the League of Nations Mandate system was to administer parts of the defunct Ottoman Empire, which had been in control of the Middle East since the 16th century, "until such time as they are able to stand alone."[3] The civil Mandate administration was formalized with the League of Nations' consent in 1923 under the British Mandate for Palestine, which covered two administrative areas. The land west of the Jordan River, known as Palestine, was under direct British administration until 1948, while the land east of the Jordan was a semi-autonomous region known as Transjordan, under the rule of the Hashemite family from the Hijaz, and gained independence in 1946.[4]

read more http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandatory_Palestine

and check out these articles http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McMahon%E2%80%93Hussein_Correspondence

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sykes%E2%80%93Picot_Agreement

You do know that wikipedia is a BS source for information. Thats why if used as a reference in a UWI assignment, you'll immediately fail................

Well then suggest a more valid source of information!!

Anywhere else??? look at sites who are supporting both sides...BBC ..CNN will be supporting Israel....Al Jazeera will lean toward palestine....read from both and filter sense from nonsense

[Slartibartfast]

You do know that wikipedia is a BS source for information. Thats why if used as a reference in a UWI assignment, you'll immediately fail................

Partially true. The articles are not reviewed by experts in the field being researched which means that the information can potentially be wrong. That does not mean that the information will always be wrong.

Anyway, why don't you let us know which parts of that quote are inaccurate and set the record straight for all of us here.

[megadoc1]

You do know that wikipedia is a BS source for information. Thats why if used as a reference in a UWI assignment, you'll immediately fail................

yes you may be right if you are one of those "paper title chasers" then wiki will land u in trouble and your statement bears testimony of such mentality....but for one who's willing to use his brain wiki becomes a great place to start! so I disagree with your blanket statement on Wikipedia! as one can do himself a favor and scroll down to the bottom of the page, look at the sources,find them and take a read ....after all, factual evidence was used there and is available for u to dig in and draw your own conclusions ! Re the McMahon–Hussein Correspondence and the Sykes–Picot Agreement
you can also look up opposing views and present them here if u can !

my use of wiki was not for whatever your objections to it may be

we can go as far back and see that all these problems was started by the actions of this guy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gavrilo_Princip and the group he was involved with ..would you go dig into it?