Postby sMASH » May 8th, 2013, 11:39 am
if we missing the point is because we do not see the point.
once i was playing chess with a dude and i was able to predict that a specific move he was going to make based upon how the board was set up at the time, his trend of moves, and my moves. as nice as it felt to be able to deduce what was going to happen in the future, the move was of no use to help my position. also, i was unable to make a plan based on it, nor predict what was going to happen after. so knowing what was going to happen was useless in that case.
yes, she might step down, but what is it to us that we need to follow up on it?
if she abdicates or dies, either way charles getting it. there are 4 ways i see that she can leave office. being usurped or taken over by another country are very unlikely, so the only two probable ways are by death or abdication.
again, either way charles taken eet
if u say the way in which she leaves the office is significant, then the prediction of abdication is inconsequential. what WOULD be of significance is if the predictions say that because she left office, she gets kidnapped, and that throws the UK into war, and US join them and korea, syri, iran, china, russia, pakistan, all fight against them. its WWIII like we never imagined.
and the engineers show up and remove the presence of humans from the planet.
now that would be a prediction of substance.
what u suggest is just an educated guess which can go either of two ways, and u put forward no subsequent happenings that would make the different ways relevant
let me put it another way. if u say that her leaving office would result in bodi prices increasing by 500% within a week, then that is a prediction.
just saying she would leave the office with out dying is just a guess.
