Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
drchaos wrote:
I'm gonna need to correct/translate this for you guys ....
"firetruck the media, I ONLY use stats from scientific journals, and other reputable statistical bodies that confirms my BIAS. While ignoring the reputable sources of information that is against my pseudoscientific beliefs"
#fixed
drchaos wrote:
I think you're covid brain dead since you can't see the relevance of a simple analogy.
Looking at a baseline gives you a yearly average ... If you don't show the individual years against the previous base line you are freaking yourself without lube.
Every year you will find countries that have deviations against the mean.
Time to put on your engineer outfit to figure this one out ... Or it is the Lawyer outfit? or is it the police woman outfit.
I forgot you're a Trans-professional ... you have your own definition of what profession you are
sounding like the full metal alchemist hereIt is how one finds the truth
Dohplaydat wrote:ruffneck_12 wrote:Dohplaydat wrote:ruffneck_12 wrote:hate how this thread devolves into essays quoting essays quoting essays
Like
The virus is basically harmless but overhyped.
The vaccine is basically harmless but overhyped.
But both are being overhyped for a reason. All these discussions are surface level.
Leh me know when yall ready to go balls deep with the tinfoil hat theories
The virus isn't overhyped otherwise we wouldn't have had to lockdown.
It unfortunately falls in the category where healthy people are mostly fine, thus causing a lot of people to be ignorant of its effects.
We know older and sickly people are not fine with this virus.
Combine that with a virus that's extremely infectious and results in 10% of cases to require hospitalisation, it's obvious to see that it is causing real problems across the world.
Let me guess, you got these facts by the same news outlets that told you Epstein killed himself huh
firetruck the media, I use stats from scientific journals, and other reputable statistical bodies.
Please learn how to verify research and figure out what are credible sources. Something tells me if you think 'we' get and trust stats given to us by the media then that's s reflection of your own information gathering skills.
Ahhhh how quickly do we forget these vaccine manufacturers are just that businesses and businesses need to make money .....imagine you have to take this vaccine every 6 months of your life who really benefiting ?ruffneck_12 wrote:Dohplaydat wrote:ruffneck_12 wrote:Dohplaydat wrote:ruffneck_12 wrote:hate how this thread devolves into essays quoting essays quoting essays
Like
The virus is basically harmless but overhyped.
The vaccine is basically harmless but overhyped.
But both are being overhyped for a reason. All these discussions are surface level.
Leh me know when yall ready to go balls deep with the tinfoil hat theories
The virus isn't overhyped otherwise we wouldn't have had to lockdown.
It unfortunately falls in the category where healthy people are mostly fine, thus causing a lot of people to be ignorant of its effects.
We know older and sickly people are not fine with this virus.
Combine that with a virus that's extremely infectious and results in 10% of cases to require hospitalisation, it's obvious to see that it is causing real problems across the world.
Let me guess, you got these facts by the same news outlets that told you Epstein killed himself huh
firetruck the media, I use stats from scientific journals, and other reputable statistical bodies.
Please learn how to verify research and figure out what are credible sources. Something tells me if you think 'we' get and trust stats given to us by the media then that's s reflection of your own information gathering skills.
Remember that time tobacco companies paid scientists to say smoking was healthy?
Or that time sugar based food companies paid scientists to say fat is the culprit for health problems, not sugar?
good times good times
Trust the experts.
Yes the same FDA that is financed by the said businesses such as PFIZER how is that not a conflict of interestDohplaydat wrote:This is why we have way more checks and balances as well as regularity authorities like the FDA and others to approve drugs.
Are these authorities perfect? No but they're staffed with tonnes of qualified people doing their best to improve drug safety and verify manufacturer claims.
What companies?hover11 wrote:Yes the same FDA that is financed by the said businesses such as PFIZER how is that not a conflict of interestDohplaydat wrote:This is why we have way more checks and balances as well as regularity authorities like the FDA and others to approve drugs.
Are these authorities perfect? No but they're staffed with tonnes of qualified people doing their best to improve drug safety and verify manufacturer claims.
The Biopharmaceutical Industry Provides 75% Of The FDA's Drug Review Budget. Is This A Problem?adnj wrote:What companies?hover11 wrote:Yes the same FDA that is financed by the said businesses such as PFIZER how is that not a conflict of interestDohplaydat wrote:This is why we have way more checks and balances as well as regularity authorities like the FDA and others to approve drugs.
Are these authorities perfect? No but they're staffed with tonnes of qualified people doing their best to improve drug safety and verify manufacturer claims.
FDA is an agency within the Department of Health and Human Services and consists of nine Center-level organizations and thirteen Headquarter (HQ) Offices. The list below contains the links to the FDA Overview Organization Chart, followed by links for each Center-level organization, in alphabetical order. The organization chart for the Office of Operations is also included.
https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/fda-organ ... ion-charts
The Department of Health and Human Services protects the health of all Americans and provides essential human services.
https://www.usa.gov/federal-agencies/u- ... n-services
Dohplaydat wrote:This is why we have way more checks and balances as well as regularity authorities like the FDA and others to approve drugs.
Are these authorities perfect? No but they're staffed with tonnes of qualified people doing their best to improve drug safety and verify manufacturer claims.
Only Trinidad have corruptionruffneck_12 wrote:Dohplaydat wrote:This is why we have way more checks and balances as well as regularity authorities like the FDA and others to approve drugs.
Are these authorities perfect? No but they're staffed with tonnes of qualified people doing their best to improve drug safety and verify manufacturer claims.
How you living in trinidad and dunno bout corruption
cHeCkS aNd BaLaNcEs
Trust the experts guys,
The FDA does so much more than approve drugs. Is corruption possible? Sure.hover11 wrote:The Biopharmaceutical Industry Provides 75% Of The FDA's Drug Review Budget. Is This A Problem?adnj wrote:What companies?hover11 wrote:Yes the same FDA that is financed by the said businesses such as PFIZER how is that not a conflict of interestDohplaydat wrote:This is why we have way more checks and balances as well as regularity authorities like the FDA and others to approve drugs.
Are these authorities perfect? No but they're staffed with tonnes of qualified people doing their best to improve drug safety and verify manufacturer claims.
FDA is an agency within the Department of Health and Human Services and consists of nine Center-level organizations and thirteen Headquarter (HQ) Offices. The list below contains the links to the FDA Overview Organization Chart, followed by links for each Center-level organization, in alphabetical order. The organization chart for the Office of Operations is also included.
https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/fda-organ ... ion-charts
The Department of Health and Human Services protects the health of all Americans and provides essential human services.
https://www.usa.gov/federal-agencies/u- ... n-services
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes ... oblem/amp/
You are saying 75 percent funding is not a conflict of interest ?
So I did a Google search, and James C. Smith is NOT currently the CEO of Reuters. So that seems false. Also it says right there, the first two guys on that list were FORMERLY at the FDA, meaning that they're not there now. So they wouldn't have any control over what the FDA does.ruffneck_12 wrote:Dohplaydat wrote:This is why we have way more checks and balances as well as regularity authorities like the FDA and others to approve drugs.
Are these authorities perfect? No but they're staffed with tonnes of qualified people doing their best to improve drug safety and verify manufacturer claims.
How you living in trinidad and dunno bout corruption
cHeCkS aNd BaLaNcEs
Trust the experts guys,
eitech wrote:It would be interesting if any of us would look back in a year or two, if alive, and come here and say, well geez we were wrong ( from either side). Would you?
redmanjp wrote:eitech wrote:It would be interesting if any of us would look back in a year or two, if alive, and come here and say, well geez we were wrong ( from either side). Would you?
Well it's more than 1 year since the clinical trials were done. But it's been about 10 months since millions around the world started getting vaccinated. Outside of 1 or 2 months after you would not see any serious adverse effects of the vaccine startingto develop.
Romania's 2,000 intensive care beds are all full, and patients are now having to wait outside. The first 50 critically ill patients have been transferred to hospitals in Hungary and Poland.
"Sometimes I feel like the whole country has become a resuscitation department," said Dorel Sandesc, head of intensive care at Timisoara hospital in western Romania.
"It is a national failure on all levels. We are witnessing a kind of national blindness, caused by the lack of education, by the lack of civilisation," Dr Sandesc, who's vice-chairman of the Romanian Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, told the Puterea a Cincea website.
Vaccination levels now stand at little more than 29% of the whole population and 34% of the adult population, the second lowest in the EU after Bulgaria
She said "To protect more people and save more lives".eitech wrote:https://youtu.be/5l6yvjUgvXk
At 4:15, did she say “marked people”? I aint know there was a new name for vaccinated.
Clean your earsed360123 wrote:She said "To protect more people and save more lives".eitech wrote:https://youtu.be/5l6yvjUgvXk
At 4:15, did she say “marked people”? I aint know there was a new name for vaccinated.
Clean out yuh ears.
ed360123 wrote:She said "To protect more people and save more lives".eitech wrote:https://youtu.be/5l6yvjUgvXk
At 4:15, did she say “marked people”? I aint know there was a new name for vaccinated.
Clean out yuh ears.
She said "more" dumbass. Even Live Captions thinks so.hover11 wrote:Clean your earsed360123 wrote:She said "To protect more people and save more lives".eitech wrote:https://youtu.be/5l6yvjUgvXk
At 4:15, did she say “marked people”? I aint know there was a new name for vaccinated.
Clean out yuh ears.
https://youtu.be/zLVdFhFkCUc
She is saying to protect marked ppl
ed360123 wrote:She said "more" dumbass. Even Live Captions thinks so.hover11 wrote:Clean your earsed360123 wrote:She said "To protect more people and save more lives".eitech wrote:https://youtu.be/5l6yvjUgvXk
At 4:15, did she say “marked people”? I aint know there was a new name for vaccinated.
Clean out yuh ears.
https://youtu.be/zLVdFhFkCUc
She is saying to protect marked ppl
What are you even on about?eitech wrote:ed360123 wrote:She said "more" dumbass. Even Live Captions thinks so.hover11 wrote:Clean your earsed360123 wrote:She said "To protect more people and save more lives".eitech wrote:https://youtu.be/5l6yvjUgvXk
At 4:15, did she say “marked people”? I aint know there was a new name for vaccinated.
Clean out yuh ears.
https://youtu.be/zLVdFhFkCUc
She is saying to protect marked ppl
So what if yuh marked? Yuh protected from covid.
ed360123 wrote:What are you even on about?eitech wrote:ed360123 wrote:She said "more" dumbass. Even Live Captions thinks so.hover11 wrote:Clean your earsed360123 wrote:She said "To protect more people and save more lives".eitech wrote:https://youtu.be/5l6yvjUgvXk
At 4:15, did she say “marked people”? I aint know there was a new name for vaccinated.
Clean out yuh ears.
https://youtu.be/zLVdFhFkCUc
She is saying to protect marked ppl
So what if yuh marked? Yuh protected from covid.
If you really believe in that nonsense then I don't know what to tell you.eitech wrote:ed360123 wrote:What are you even on about?eitech wrote:ed360123 wrote:She said "more" dumbass. Even Live Captions thinks so.hover11 wrote:Clean your earsed360123 wrote:She said "To protect more people and save more lives".eitech wrote:https://youtu.be/5l6yvjUgvXk
At 4:15, did she say “marked people”? I aint know there was a new name for vaccinated.
Clean out yuh ears.
https://youtu.be/zLVdFhFkCUc
She is saying to protect marked ppl
So what if yuh marked? Yuh protected from covid.
Lol thanks for participating in a short survey marked dude.
ed360123 wrote:If you really believe in that nonsense then I don't know what to tell you.eitech wrote:ed360123 wrote:What are you even on about?eitech wrote:ed360123 wrote:She said "more" dumbass. Even Live Captions thinks so.hover11 wrote:Clean your earsed360123 wrote:She said "To protect more people and save more lives".eitech wrote:https://youtu.be/5l6yvjUgvXk
At 4:15, did she say “marked people”? I aint know there was a new name for vaccinated.
Clean out yuh ears.
https://youtu.be/zLVdFhFkCUc
She is saying to protect marked ppl
So what if yuh marked? Yuh protected from covid.
Lol thanks for participating in a short survey marked dude.
ed360123 wrote:And since y'all couldn't bother to use Google. Here's the official transcript.
Source: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/press-briefings/2021/09/10/press-briefing-by-press-secretary-jen-psaki-september-10-2021/
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: Dohplaydat, Kritical01 and 135 guests