Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
The independent senators appointment by the president are independent.VexXx Dogg wrote:ALL the independent senators sided voted no.
If the case had merit, don't ya think that at least one or two independents woulda swing a yes?
Seems like it was just a timewasting exercise under the guise of legitimacy?Asha Javeed on FB wrote:The motion is defeated.
24 members voted for the Motion, 47 voted against, no abstentions.
All govt voted no, all opposition voted yes, all independents voted no.
Even between 2010 - 2015? This requires serious investigation.wtf wrote:The independent senators appointment by the president are independent.VexXx Dogg wrote:ALL the independent senators sided voted no.
If the case had merit, don't ya think that at least one or two independents woulda swing a yes?
Seems like it was just a timewasting exercise under the guise of legitimacy?Asha Javeed on FB wrote:The motion is defeated.
24 members voted for the Motion, 47 voted against, no abstentions.
All govt voted no, all opposition voted yes, all independents voted no.
Yea right.
What case?VexXx Dogg wrote:ALL the independent senators sided voted no.
If the case had merit, don't ya think that at least one or two independents woulda swing a yes?
Seems like it was just a timewasting exercise under the guise of legitimacy?Asha Javeed on FB wrote:The motion is defeated.
24 members voted for the Motion, 47 voted against, no abstentions.
All govt voted no, all opposition voted yes, all independents voted no.
One step at a time, this just opened a cans of worms.The_Honourable wrote:So Zoom... wuz d plan now? the stage not good again.
Was it democratic not to debate the matter?Redman wrote:It can't be democratic if the UNC didn't get it's way
The independents are PNM agents.VexXx Dogg wrote:ALL the independent senators sided voted no.
If the case had merit, don't ya think that at least one or two independents woulda swing a yes?
Seems like it was just a timewasting exercise under the guise of legitimacy?Asha Javeed on FB wrote:The motion is defeated.
24 members voted for the Motion, 47 voted against, no abstentions.
All govt voted no, all opposition voted yes, all independents voted no.
wtf wrote:The independent senators appointment by the president are independent.VexXx Dogg wrote:ALL the independent senators sided voted no.
If the case had merit, don't ya think that at least one or two independents woulda swing a yes?
Seems like it was just a timewasting exercise under the guise of legitimacy?Asha Javeed on FB wrote:The motion is defeated.
24 members voted for the Motion, 47 voted against, no abstentions.
All govt voted no, all opposition voted yes, all independents voted no.
Yea right.
The independent senators voted on a motion where they facts and evidence wasn't put on the parliamentary record.VexXx Dogg wrote:wtf wrote:The independent senators appointment by the president are independent.VexXx Dogg wrote:ALL the independent senators sided voted no.
If the case had merit, don't ya think that at least one or two independents woulda swing a yes?
Seems like it was just a timewasting exercise under the guise of legitimacy?Asha Javeed on FB wrote:The motion is defeated.
24 members voted for the Motion, 47 voted against, no abstentions.
All govt voted no, all opposition voted yes, all independents voted no.
Yea right.
So independent senators are "yes men/women" because the Pres appointed them?
I'm just curious what the perception is.
I disagree with my boss all the time, it can be done respectfully. Integrity is one thing that I'll never compromise, and if a similiar situation arose where my impartiality/integrity would be questioned, I'd quicker walk.
VexXx Dogg wrote:ALL the independent senators sided voted no.
If the case had merit, don't ya think that at least one or two independents woulda swing a yes?
Seems like it was just a timewasting exercise under the guise of legitimacy?Asha Javeed on FB wrote:The motion is defeated.
24 members voted for the Motion, 47 voted against, no abstentions.
All govt voted no, all opposition voted yes, all independents voted no.
Dizzy28 wrote:The Independent bench also includes the sister of a key party in this whole issue. Charisse sister or Bliss.
Its not unfeasible for her to canvass the remaining Independents who all are PMW appointees anyhows. This is Trinidad nothing less than ethical is not realisticVexXx Dogg wrote:ALL the independent senators sided voted no.
If the case had merit, don't ya think that at least one or two independents woulda swing a yes?
Seems like it was just a timewasting exercise under the guise of legitimacy?Asha Javeed on FB wrote:The motion is defeated.
24 members voted for the Motion, 47 voted against, no abstentions.
All govt voted no, all opposition voted yes, all independents voted no.
zoom rader wrote:One step at a time, this just opened a cans of worms.
Remember we live in a land that does not understand the consitution, plus a precedent as be set.
Dizzy28 wrote:The Independent bench also includes the sister of a key party in this whole issue. Charisse sister or Bliss.
Its not unfeasible for her to canvass the remaining Independents who all are PMW appointees anyhows. This is Trinidad nothing less than ethical is not realisticVexXx Dogg wrote:ALL the independent senators sided voted no.
If the case had merit, don't ya think that at least one or two independents woulda swing a yes?
Seems like it was just a timewasting exercise under the guise of legitimacy?Asha Javeed on FB wrote:The motion is defeated.
24 members voted for the Motion, 47 voted against, no abstentions.
All govt voted no, all opposition voted yes, all independents voted no.
wtf wrote:Kamla isn't doing this for herself.
I find she should just stay quiet and let PNM do the population what they so desire.
She is actually fighting really hard for the average citizens. Even the powder necks.
For the integrity of our governing institutionsmero wrote:Another day, another L for the UNC.
Wonder how this must feel. Just L's, no Wins.
Too many urkles on your team, that's why your Winslow.
Heh
The precedent was set by the speaker not to hold a debate.MaxPower wrote:zoom rader wrote:One step at a time, this just opened a cans of worms.
Remember we live in a land that does not understand the consitution, plus a precedent as be set.
Zoom,
The can of worms opened long time bro.
A precedent set by Kamla is no precedent.
We need people on board who can take action, not just talk up in their ass and lead on the public.
Did you hear a debate?Redman wrote:The motion is based on whether the Prez did chit or not.
Not the actions of the PSC.....
That said if I were her I would have abstained...to prove the point,not like it was even close.
We have to accept that the vast majority of the electoral college did not think a tribunal was necessary.
The debate would have just been the unc trying the matter under parliamentary cover.Dizzy28 wrote:The Independent bench also includes the sister of a key party in this whole issue. Charisse sister or Bliss.
Its not unfeasible for her to canvass the remaining Independents who all are PMW appointees anyhows. This is Trinidad nothing less than ethical is not realisticVexXx Dogg wrote:ALL the independent senators sided voted no.
If the case had merit, don't ya think that at least one or two independents woulda swing a yes?
Seems like it was just a timewasting exercise under the guise of legitimacy?Asha Javeed on FB wrote:The motion is defeated.
24 members voted for the Motion, 47 voted against, no abstentions.
All govt voted no, all opposition voted yes, all independents voted no.
What was the Constitution in this case ?cornfused wrote:Time wasting from the start. So called experienced politicians do not know the Trinidad and Tobago Constitution
zoom rader wrote:Was it democratic not to debate the matter?Redman wrote:It can't be democratic if the UNC didn't get it's way
The independents are PNM agents.VexXx Dogg wrote:ALL the independent senators sided voted no.
If the case had merit, don't ya think that at least one or two independents woulda swing a yes?
Seems like it was just a timewasting exercise under the guise of legitimacy?Asha Javeed on FB wrote:The motion is defeated.
24 members voted for the Motion, 47 voted against, no abstentions.
All govt voted no, all opposition voted yes, all independents voted no.
Which people can file motions?MaxPower wrote:We need more important and relevant people to file motions.
There should be NO room for incompetency.
Then the precedent has been set for future governments when holding a motion of no conference.Redman wrote:zoom rader wrote:Was it democratic not to debate the matter?Redman wrote:It can't be democratic if the UNC didn't get it's way
The independents are PNM agents.VexXx Dogg wrote:ALL the independent senators sided voted no.
If the case had merit, don't ya think that at least one or two independents woulda swing a yes?
Seems like it was just a timewasting exercise under the guise of legitimacy?Asha Javeed on FB wrote:The motion is defeated.
24 members voted for the Motion, 47 voted against, no abstentions.
All govt voted no, all opposition voted yes, all independents voted no.
There is no right to a debate...it's a vote.
That's what the speaker read out at the outset....rules that govern this process.
Seems that the UNC made themselves irrelevant at this stage as well.
These clerks are employed direct from bailiser brothel.Mmoney607 wrote:Them clerks look like them young people who don't know nothing but they just like pnm because issa black man party
zoom rader wrote:Which people can file motions?MaxPower wrote:We need more important and relevant people to file motions.
There should be NO room for incompetency.