Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
Wraith King wrote:Habit7 wrote:sMASH wrote:We covered that already a few pages back when the tar was completed and it was not runnung.Habit7 wrote:sMASH wrote:But seems like they hell bent on mashing up every goddam industry for poktical and personal financial gains.
How is the T1 TAR mashing up the industry?
I explained the difference between the 'Atlantic lng train 1' and the 'TAR' cause u seemed to not know d fack ur Talking about but yappin.
My knowledge of the subject is far better than your spelling. But don't punt, how is the T1 TAR mashing up the industry?
Habit7 believes he's an expert on every topic by association because be believes he receives expert information from his handler who he believes is an expert on every topic.
Habit7 is also the person who posted an "academic" article that said flooding is desirable and necessary, he said Tobago is a rural municipality and the PNM corruption and incompetence is the fault of the UNC because the UNC didn't stop them from engaging in it.
Somehow he believes he claiming to be knowledgable on a topic holds weight.
Habit7 wrote:The boastWraith King wrote:Redman wrote:Wraith king...can you explain the UNC abstention from votes?
What's the strategy?
I can because I am experienced in parliamentary practice and knowledge.
The backpedalWraith King wrote:One of your male lovers asked about abstaining and I explained its use in a general way.
Habit7 wrote:Wraith King wrote:Habit7 wrote:sMASH wrote:We covered that already a few pages back when the tar was completed and it was not runnung.Habit7 wrote:sMASH wrote:But seems like they hell bent on mashing up every goddam industry for poktical and personal financial gains.
How is the T1 TAR mashing up the industry?
I explained the difference between the 'Atlantic lng train 1' and the 'TAR' cause u seemed to not know d fack ur Talking about but yappin.
My knowledge of the subject is far better than your spelling. But don't punt, how is the T1 TAR mashing up the industry?
Habit7 believes he's an expert on every topic by association because be believes he receives expert information from his handler who he believes is an expert on every topic.
Habit7 is also the person who posted an "academic" article that said flooding is desirable and necessary, he said Tobago is a rural municipality and the PNM corruption and incompetence is the fault of the UNC because the UNC didn't stop them from engaging in it.
Somehow he believes he claiming to be knowledgable on a topic holds weight.
Habit7 wrote:The boastWraith King wrote:Redman wrote:Wraith king...can you explain the UNC abstention from votes?
What's the strategy?
I can because I am experienced in parliamentary practice and knowledge.
The backpedalWraith King wrote:One of your male lovers asked about abstaining and I explained its use in a general way.
De Dragon wrote:Lawyers now saying indemnity cannot fly, and Impsy cannot indemnify anybody
De Dragon wrote:Lawyers now saying indemnity cannot fly, and Impsy cannot indemnify anybody
Wraith King wrote:De Dragon wrote:Lawyers now saying indemnity cannot fly, and Impsy cannot indemnify anybody
Yes but remember the PNM didn't pursue the case against Malcolm Jones. They may just do the same thing with another lame excuse for their corruption.
De Dragon wrote:Wraith King wrote:De Dragon wrote:Lawyers now saying indemnity cannot fly, and Impsy cannot indemnify anybody
Yes but remember the PNM didn't pursue the case against Malcolm Jones. They may just do the same thing with another lame excuse for their corruption.
That was just pure corruption, but the fact that the NGC Board could make a decision to throw almost quarter of a BILLION dollars and then seek indemnity for that decision, stinks to the high heavens. Even if they were compelled by JUHN Scarfy/Impsy/Goebbels, it shows clearly that none of them have the stones or the best interest of T&T in mind.
Yet you have the rabid LFD RFD PNM usual apologist sheep crew with their dotish "we eh know keke keke keke" nonsense
randolphinshan wrote:De Dragon wrote:Wraith King wrote:De Dragon wrote:Lawyers now saying indemnity cannot fly, and Impsy cannot indemnify anybody
Yes but remember the PNM didn't pursue the case against Malcolm Jones. They may just do the same thing with another lame excuse for their corruption.
That was just pure corruption, but the fact that the NGC Board could make a decision to throw almost quarter of a BILLION dollars and then seek indemnity for that decision, stinks to the high heavens. Even if they were compelled by JUHN Scarfy/Impsy/Goebbels, it shows clearly that none of them have the stones or the best interest of T&T in mind.
Yet you have the rabid LFD RFD PNM usual apologist sheep crew with their dotish "we eh know keke keke keke" nonsense
Hope we can get the 1 BILLION wasted on the wastewater treatment plant by Kams and her crooks too
randolphinshan wrote:
Hope we can get the 1 BILLION wasted on the wastewater treatment plant by Kams and her crooks too
Where is the 600milion from project pride?Habit7 wrote:randolphinshan wrote:
Hope we can get the 1 BILLION wasted on the wastewater treatment plant by Kams and her crooks too
Yeah they want blood from a NGC board for a $400M action that we don't know the result of yet.
But the $1B the NGC gave to SIS for a project for which they overbid and admitted they can't finish, they silent.
But for some, taxpayer money is only bad spent when the govt you didn't support is in power.
zoom rader wrote:Where is the 600milion from project pride?Habit7 wrote:Yeah they want blood from a NGC board for a $400M action that we don't know the result of yet.
But the $1B the NGC gave to SIS for a project for which they overbid and admitted they can't finish, they silent.
But for some, taxpayer money is only bad spent when the govt you didn't support is in power.
Not even a gain of sand for the red government airport con job.
Talk about dat nah cont
And u still rush to vote red governmentJoshie23 wrote:zoom rader wrote:Where is the 600milion from project pride?Habit7 wrote:Yeah they want blood from a NGC board for a $400M action that we don't know the result of yet.
But the $1B the NGC gave to SIS for a project for which they overbid and admitted they can't finish, they silent.
But for some, taxpayer money is only bad spent when the govt you didn't support is in power.
Not even a gain of sand for the red government airport con job.
Talk about dat nah cont
Y'all are hilarious. Studying which of the political leaders you have a Helga in Hey Arnold-like shrine for stole/squandered/misplaced more and/or why and/or what and/or where, as justification for how much less the other stole/squandered/misplaced, instead of holding them BOTH to account and demanding value for money.
That's why they'll continue to teef, give away and mismanage our resources and disrespect us as a nation, unabated.
People like YOU enable them.
Joshie23 wrote:zoom rader wrote:Where is the 600milion from project pride?Habit7 wrote:Yeah they want blood from a NGC board for a $400M action that we don't know the result of yet.
But the $1B the NGC gave to SIS for a project for which they overbid and admitted they can't finish, they silent.
But for some, taxpayer money is only bad spent when the govt you didn't support is in power.
Not even a gain of sand for the red government airport con job.
Talk about dat nah cont
Y'all are hilarious. Studying which of the political leaders you have a Helga in Hey Arnold-like shrine for stole/squandered/misplaced more and/or why and/or what and/or where, as justification for how much less the other stole/squandered/misplaced, instead of holding them BOTH to account and demanding value for money.
That's why they'll continue to teef, give away and mismanage our resources and disrespect us as a nation, unabated.
People like YOU enable them.
De Dragon wrote:Disagree, the very few options to hold them accountable like civil cases cannot be allowed to be voided by indemnifications like what JUHN Scarfy and Impsy have granted to the shambolic NGC Board. Only when ALL politicians, State Board members, TTPS, Public Servants etc, realize that they have a realistic chance of personal loss, will we even turn a corner and reverse the rot that has weighed down this country for far too long.
Joshie23 wrote:Anyhow, back to energy. Separated these posts so we don't continue to derail the thread.
Glad to see the MoU between NGC and SWMCOL re: landfill gas. Several wins there..
Methane vs CO2 as a GHG, goes without saying, so if we can use it for fuel, why not. Also, I'm not sure how much NG or NGLs are used for CNG. Even if it's a small amount that can now be redirected to ALNG, the PL Estate or elsewhere, instead of used for fuel, again..why not. Let's see how this rolls out.
Also, let's talk Energy Transition, locally for now. The impacts, potential, etc. Thoughts?
De Dragon wrote:Joshie23 wrote:zoom rader wrote:Where is the 600milion from project pride?Habit7 wrote:Yeah they want blood from a NGC board for a $400M action that we don't know the result of yet.
But the $1B the NGC gave to SIS for a project for which they overbid and admitted they can't finish, they silent.
But for some, taxpayer money is only bad spent when the govt you didn't support is in power.
Not even a gain of sand for the red government airport con job.
Talk about dat nah cont
Y'all are hilarious. Studying which of the political leaders you have a Helga in Hey Arnold-like shrine for stole/squandered/misplaced more and/or why and/or what and/or where, as justification for how much less the other stole/squandered/misplaced, instead of holding them BOTH to account and demanding value for money.
That's why they'll continue to teef, give away and mismanage our resources and disrespect us as a nation, unabated.
People like YOU enable them.
Disagree, the very few options to hold them accountable like civil cases cannot be allowed to be voided by indemnifications like what JUHN Scarfy and Impsy have granted to the shambolic NGC Board. Only when ALL politicians, State Board members, TTPS, Public Servants etc, realize that they have a realistic chance of personal loss, will we even turn a corner and reverse the rot that has weighed down this country for far too long.
Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:Joshie23 wrote:zoom rader wrote:Where is the 600milion from project pride?Habit7 wrote:Yeah they want blood from a NGC board for a $400M action that we don't know the result of yet.
But the $1B the NGC gave to SIS for a project for which they overbid and admitted they can't finish, they silent.
But for some, taxpayer money is only bad spent when the govt you didn't support is in power.
Not even a gain of sand for the red government airport con job.
Talk about dat nah cont
Y'all are hilarious. Studying which of the political leaders you have a Helga in Hey Arnold-like shrine for stole/squandered/misplaced more and/or why and/or what and/or where, as justification for how much less the other stole/squandered/misplaced, instead of holding them BOTH to account and demanding value for money.
That's why they'll continue to teef, give away and mismanage our resources and disrespect us as a nation, unabated.
People like YOU enable them.
Disagree, the very few options to hold them accountable like civil cases cannot be allowed to be voided by indemnifications like what JUHN Scarfy and Impsy have granted to the shambolic NGC Board. Only when ALL politicians, State Board members, TTPS, Public Servants etc, realize that they have a realistic chance of personal loss, will we even turn a corner and reverse the rot that has weighed down this country for far too long.
Forget party.
Would you offer yourself to serve on a board if you know that in 5years govt can switch, and a case brought against YOU as an individual, that is weak but politically driven?
We asking people to serve in a way that opens them up to ruin.
Barbados have a real Prime MinisterRedman wrote:Joshie23 wrote:Anyhow, back to energy. Separated these posts so we don't continue to derail the thread.
Glad to see the MoU between NGC and SWMCOL re: landfill gas. Several wins there..
Methane vs CO2 as a GHG, goes without saying, so if we can use it for fuel, why not. Also, I'm not sure how much NG or NGLs are used for CNG. Even if it's a small amount that can now be redirected to ALNG, the PL Estate or elsewhere, instead of used for fuel, again..why not. Let's see how this rolls out.
Also, let's talk Energy Transition, locally for now. The impacts, potential, etc. Thoughts?
I call BS on the land fill project.
Swmcol has resisted multiple attempts and dealing with solid waste.
Pictures at signing...then projects die.
We not serious at transition.
Look at Barbados for a country that has a plan.
And is executing and attracting fdi.
Policy in place,Feed in Tariff stated, concessions available.
Solar in TnT is thus far, a gimmicky pr stunt.
Wind worse.
We eh ready yet.
Redman wrote:Joshie23 wrote:Anyhow, back to energy. Separated these posts so we don't continue to derail the thread.
Glad to see the MoU between NGC and SWMCOL re: landfill gas. Several wins there..
Methane vs CO2 as a GHG, goes without saying, so if we can use it for fuel, why not. Also, I'm not sure how much NG or NGLs are used for CNG. Even if it's a small amount that can now be redirected to ALNG, the PL Estate or elsewhere, instead of used for fuel, again..why not. Let's see how this rolls out.
Also, let's talk Energy Transition, locally for now. The impacts, potential, etc. Thoughts?
I call BS on the land fill project.
Swmcol has resisted multiple attempts to modify their dealing with solid waste.
Pictures at signing...then projects die.
Typical Trini projects. Let's hope this kicks off because again, methane is several times more potent than carbon dioxide. It's a quick win if managed properly.
We not serious at transition.
Look at Barbados for a country that has a plan.
And is executing and attracting fdi.
Policy in place,Feed in Tariff stated, concessions available.
Solar in TnT is thus far, a gimmicky pr stunt.
Wind worse.
Well wind and solar both require minimum parameters to be effective. We can reach somewhere with solar, wind might not be lucrative or feasible though.
We eh ready yet.
Redman wrote:De Dragon wrote:Joshie23 wrote:zoom rader wrote:Where is the 600milion from project pride?Habit7 wrote:Yeah they want blood from a NGC board for a $400M action that we don't know the result of yet.
But the $1B the NGC gave to SIS for a project for which they overbid and admitted they can't finish, they silent.
But for some, taxpayer money is only bad spent when the govt you didn't support is in power.
Not even a gain of sand for the red government airport con job.
Talk about dat nah cont
Y'all are hilarious. Studying which of the political leaders you have a Helga in Hey Arnold-like shrine for stole/squandered/misplaced more and/or why and/or what and/or where, as justification for how much less the other stole/squandered/misplaced, instead of holding them BOTH to account and demanding value for money.
That's why they'll continue to teef, give away and mismanage our resources and disrespect us as a nation, unabated.
People like YOU enable them.
Disagree, the very few options to hold them accountable like civil cases cannot be allowed to be voided by indemnifications like what JUHN Scarfy and Impsy have granted to the shambolic NGC Board. Only when ALL politicians, State Board members, TTPS, Public Servants etc, realize that they have a realistic chance of personal loss, will we even turn a corner and reverse the rot that has weighed down this country for far too long.
Forget party.
Would you offer yourself to serve on a board if you know that in 5years govt can switch, and a case brought against YOU as an individual, that is weak but politically driven?
We asking people to serve in a way that opens them up to ruin.
Redman wrote:Forget party.
Would you offer yourself to serve on a board if you know that in 5years govt can switch, and a case brought against YOU as an individual, that is weak but politically driven?
We asking people to serve in a way that opens them up to ruin.
Joshie23 wrote:Redman wrote:Forget party.
Would you offer yourself to serve on a board if you know that in 5years govt can switch, and a case brought against YOU as an individual, that is weak but politically driven?
We asking people to serve in a way that opens them up to ruin.
Idk how I missed this. Redman, this can't work. Serving on a Board is by no means mandatory. Kindly elaborate on your statement 'We asking people to serve in a way that opens them up to ruin.' because if you're that much of a crackshot and you're faced with a decision that could potentially 'ruin' you or worse yet, an organization, or worserer yet, an economy (!!) and you have even an iota of integrity, you would Pontius Pilate pronto. In other words, 'Let them do what they want. This company's blood is not on my hands', and if you're really that good, you'll be sitting in an interview using that experience to successfully answer the 'Tell us of a time you disagreed with your Manager' question with another organization in no time.
This isn't a type of nation where you and/or your family can be executed for failing to align with the Administration of the day. Countless persons have resigned from top posts (Robert Le Hunte, Dr. Lennox Sealy, etc. for a few recent names) and while speculation was that they didn't toe the line, they aren't obligated to answer to any of the rumours, unless they feel the need to publicly clear their names.
If the decision could be so bad that they need indemnification, and as you say their hands were forced, again I ask...why not just resign from the jump?
Joshie23 wrote:Redman wrote:Forget party.
Would you offer yourself to serve on a board if you know that in 5years govt can switch, and a case brought against YOU as an individual, that is weak but politically driven?
We asking people to serve in a way that opens them up to ruin.
Idk how I missed this. Redman, this can't work. Serving on a Board is by no means mandatory. Kindly elaborate on your statement 'We asking people to serve in a way that opens them up to ruin.' because if you're that much of a crackshot and you're faced with a decision that could potentially 'ruin' you or worse yet, an organization, or worserer yet, an economy (!!) and you have even an iota of integrity, you would Pontius Pilate pronto. In other words, 'Let them do what they want. This company's blood is not on my hands', and if you're really that good, you'll be sitting in an interview using that experience to successfully answer the 'Tell us of a time you disagreed with your Manager' question with another organization in no time.
This isn't a type of nation where you and/or your family can be executed for failing to align with the Administration of the day. Countless persons have resigned from top posts (Robert Le Hunte, Dr. Lennox Sealy, etc. for a few recent names) and while speculation was that they didn't toe the line, they aren't obligated to answer to any of the rumours, unless they feel the need to publicly clear their names.
If the decision could be so bad that they need indemnification, and as you say their hands were forced, again I ask...why not just resign from the jump?
Redman wrote:Joshie23 wrote:Redman wrote:Forget party.
Would you offer yourself to serve on a board if you know that in 5years govt can switch, and a case brought against YOU as an individual, that is weak but politically driven?
We asking people to serve in a way that opens them up to ruin.
Idk how I missed this. Redman, this can't work. Serving on a Board is by no means mandatory. Kindly elaborate on your statement 'We asking people to serve in a way that opens them up to ruin.' because if you're that much of a crackshot and you're faced with a decision that could potentially 'ruin' you or worse yet, an organization, or worserer yet, an economy (!!) and you have even an iota of integrity, you would Pontius Pilate pronto. In other words, 'Let them do what they want. This company's blood is not on my hands', and if you're really that good, you'll be sitting in an interview using that experience to successfully answer the 'Tell us of a time you disagreed with your Manager' question with another organization in no time.
This isn't a type of nation where you and/or your family can be executed for failing to align with the Administration of the day. Countless persons have resigned from top posts (Robert Le Hunte, Dr. Lennox Sealy, etc. for a few recent names) and while speculation was that they didn't toe the line, they aren't obligated to answer to any of the rumours, unless they feel the need to publicly clear their names.
If the decision could be so bad that they need indemnification, and as you say their hands were forced, again I ask...why not just resign from the jump?
Business is risk.
Political dimension s add infinite layers of risk.
Normal business decisions especially at a board level require decisions to be made now that will have an indeterminate result in the future.
The world,the markets,ministers and government change.
Allyuh talking about state enterprises that throw money on projects that they shouldn't have, possibly because the Cabinet say so because ..politics.
What makes you think cabinet wouldn't throw money behind a politically driven law suit to nail an opposing party.Its great press and people lose interest but retain the negatives.
An individual will have to fund his defense privately while the political directorate doesn't.
This is fact.
This is done by both sides.
This has happened and is happening.
Neither of you would serve if there is exponentially more downside than there is upside.
Return to “Ole talk and more Ole talk”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 82 guests