Moderator: 3ne2nr Mods
no, the car was exciting to watchwagonrunner wrote:slightly bored i think.
Duane 3NE 2NR wrote:no, the car was exciting to watchwagonrunner wrote:slightly bored i think.
I keed, I keed
wagonrunner wrote:slightly bored i think.
cinco wrote:moti wrote:cinco wrote:Spectacular event! Spent almost 5hrs in there and was more than worth 30 bux
yo!MG Man wrote:hai five ^_^
yuh big next time i want to see that silver telstar run
WEY YUH WAS????
i was in devi booth talkin to aamir n adrian after mgman molestered me
MG Man wrote:cinco wrote:moti wrote:cinco wrote:Spectacular event! Spent almost 5hrs in there and was more than worth 30 bux
yo!MG Man wrote:hai five ^_^
yuh big next time i want to see that silver telstar run
WEY YUH WAS????
i was in devi booth talkin to aamir n adrian after mgman molestered me
Yuh know, I really doh recall you protesting eh
kes_vtec wrote:wagonrunner wrote:slightly bored i think.
takes a walk outside, looks, yes those where the days...
wagonrunner wrote:I'll try to deal with just the math and ignore the scholarly comments.
Car A leave at 0.6 and run a 57.3. Total time: 57.9
Car B leave at 1.2 and run a 57.0. Total time: 58.2
Obviously Car B did a faster time, but can you understand Car B still crossed the finish line last doing so?
wagonrunner wrote:I'll try to deal with just the math and ignore the scholarly comments.
Car A leave at 0.6 and run a 57.3. Total time: 57.9
Car B leave at 1.2 and run a 57.0. Total time: 58.2
Obviously Car B did a faster time, but can you understand Car B still crossed the finish line last doing so?
nismo_demon wrote:AutoSport wrote:Just to clear up some concerns.
The times posted in the results are the times recorded for the final run.
Note 2nd place maybe faster than 1st place. This can happen when the 1st place reaction time is much better than 2nd place reaction time.
Figure this out, you get the green, . . . then you start to move. The difference is Reaction Time.
Only when you start to move is your ET starting to get rolling.
ok ok so please explain this little statement a little more clear for us competitors, what u saying here is if two cars are lined up, lets just call dem car A and car B, car A takes off with car B a little slower reaction time but somehow catches up to car A along the way, car B comes into d finish box first with a time of 57.2 secs and car a comes in with a time of 57.4 secs but had a faster reaction time dan car B, that makes car A d automatic winner??? when was this rule ever mentioned kind sir? at which briefing meeting?
with all due respect i find rules are being created all of a sudden to ensure some competitors their first place, one guy kept breaking out in a b class category instead of being bumped, the breakout time was lowered by one second, now d competitor came in last in the finals but won because of a faster reaction time
i appreciate all that autosport is doing for us and always say it publicly, but fair has to be fair for all competitors across d board sir, kindly address this situation and maybe print a rulebook for all competitors to follow throughout d rest of d year so that these "pop up" rules can stop, thank you
I was under the assumption that everyone taking part was familiar with the timing system. We should probably take a few extra minutes to explain the basics to those who may not know.dubcity wrote:By ignoring the so called "scholarly" comments you clearly missed a major point!!
The competitor clearly states that this rule was never mentioned at any meeting and just appeared.Also states that a standard rule book be implemented.
wagonrunner wrote:The only disappointment was the manner.
I'm trying to explain something to you. But I'll stop because you seem willing to accept only from another source.
ok ok so please explain this little statement a little more clear for us competitors, what u saying here is if two cars are lined up, lets just call dem car A and car B, car A takes off with car B a little slower reaction time but somehow catches up to car A along the way, car B comes into d finish box first with a time of 57.2 secs and car a comes in with a time of 57.4 secs but had a faster reaction time dan car B, that makes car A d automatic winner??? when was this rule ever mentioned kind sir? at which briefing meeting?
nismo_demon wrote:one question and this is absolutely the last time i'm asking it, was this rule with reaction time being added to our run times to determine winner and loser ever stated to competitors? that is the only question i asked and upto now never got an answer to that question
nismo_demon wrote:one question and this is absolutely the last time i'm asking it, was this rule with reaction time being added to our run times to determine winner and loser ever stated to competitors? that is the only question i asked and upto now never got an answer to that question
The timing system being used is the international standard. Your reaction to the lights is added to your running (stage) time to give a total course time. There are two times involved here!Computerman wrote:I was under the assumption that everyone taking part was familiar with the timing system. We should probably take a few extra minutes to explain the basics to those who may not know.dubcity wrote:By ignoring the so called "scholarly" comments you clearly missed a major point!!
The competitor clearly states that this rule was never mentioned at any meeting and just appeared.Also states that a standard rule book be implemented.
wagonrunner wrote:A faster ET does not guarantee you finished 1st.
You're still not seeing you can have a faster ET, and finish last?
Autosport, anyone else, wanna try?
Can you elaborate as to when this rule was infringed upon?nismo_demon wrote:wagonrunner wrote:if this is a rule then i have no problem whatsoever with it, it just has to be followed at all times and it must be made clear to all competitors, am i being unfair or unreasonable?
Return to “AutoSport Drag & Wind”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests